Department of Biology, University of Puerto Rico, Rio Piedras, Puerto Rico.
Department of Biology, University of Puerto Rico, Humacao, Puerto Rico.
Proc Biol Sci. 2020 Jul 29;287(1931):20201267. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2020.1267. Epub 2020 Jul 22.
Müllerian mimicry strongly exemplifies the power of natural selection. However, the exact measure of such adaptive phenotypic convergence and the possible causes of its imperfection often remain unidentified. Here, we first quantify wing colour pattern differences in the forewing region of 14 co-mimetic colour pattern morphs of the butterfly species and and measure the extent to which mimicking colour pattern morphs are not perfectly identical. Next, using gene-editing CRISPR/Cas9 KO experiments of the gene , which has been mapped to colour pattern diversity in these butterflies, we explore the exact areas of the wings in which affects colour pattern formation differently in and We find that, while the relative size of the forewing pattern is generally nearly identical between co-mimics, the CRISPR/Cas9 KO results highlight divergent boundaries in the wing that prevent the co-mimics from achieving perfect mimicry. We suggest that this mismatch may be explained by divergence in the gene regulatory network that defines wing colour patterning in both species, thus constraining morphological evolution even between closely related species.
米勒氏拟态强烈体现了自然选择的力量。然而,这种适应性表型趋同的确切程度以及其不完善的可能原因通常仍未被确定。在这里,我们首先量化了蝴蝶物种和的 14 种共模拟颜色图案形态的前翅区域的翅膀颜色图案差异,并测量了模仿颜色图案形态不完全相同的程度。接下来,使用基因编辑 CRISPR/Cas9 KO 实验的基因,该基因已被映射到这些蝴蝶的颜色图案多样性,我们探索了翅膀的精确区域,在这些区域中,基因在和中以不同的方式影响颜色图案形成。我们发现,虽然共模拟物的前翅图案的相对大小通常几乎相同,但 CRISPR/Cas9 KO 结果突出了翅膀中防止共模拟物实现完美拟态的分歧边界。我们认为,这种不匹配可能是由定义两种物种翅膀颜色图案的基因调控网络的分歧解释的,从而即使在密切相关的物种之间也限制了形态进化。