• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Engagement science: The core of dissemination, implementation, and translational research science.参与式科学:传播、实施及转化研究科学的核心
J Clin Transl Sci. 2020 Jan 20;4(3):216-218. doi: 10.1017/cts.2020.8.
2
Facilitating stakeholder engagement in early stage translational research.促进利益相关者参与早期转化研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Jul 2;15(7):e0235400. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235400. eCollection 2020.
3
Situating dissemination and implementation sciences within and across the translational research spectrum.将传播与实施科学置于转化研究领域之内及跨领域范畴。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2019 Jul 29;4(3):152-158. doi: 10.1017/cts.2019.392.
4
Evaluation of a stakeholder advisory board for an adolescent mental health randomized clinical trial.青少年心理健康随机临床试验的利益相关者咨询委员会评估
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Mar 28;9(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00425-6.
5
Towards an Implementation-STakeholder Engagement Model (I-STEM) for improving health and social care services.迈向实施利益相关者参与模型(I-STEM),以改善医疗保健服务。
Health Expect. 2023 Oct;26(5):1997-2012. doi: 10.1111/hex.13808. Epub 2023 Jul 4.
6
Integrating dissemination and implementation sciences within Clinical and Translational Science Award programs to advance translational research: Recommendations to national and local leaders.将传播与实施科学融入临床和转化科学奖计划以推进转化研究:给国家和地方领导者的建议。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2021 Jul 12;5(1):e151. doi: 10.1017/cts.2021.815. eCollection 2021.
7
Building capacity for dissemination and implementation to maximize research impact in a CTSA: The University of Wisconsin story.在临床与转化科学奖(CTSA)中提升传播与实施能力以最大化研究影响力:威斯康星大学的故事。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2020 Jan 10;4(3):209-215. doi: 10.1017/cts.2020.3.
8
Supporting researchers in knowledge translation and dissemination of their research to increase usability and impact.支持研究人员进行知识转化,并将其研究成果传播出去,以提高可用性和影响力。
Qual Life Res. 2022 Oct;31(10):2959-2968. doi: 10.1007/s11136-022-03122-1. Epub 2022 Mar 18.
9
Integration of stakeholder engagement from development to dissemination in genomic medicine research: Approaches and outcomes from the CSER Consortium.基因组医学研究中从开发到传播阶段的利益相关者参与整合:CSER 联盟的方法和结果。
Genet Med. 2022 May;24(5):1108-1119. doi: 10.1016/j.gim.2022.01.008. Epub 2022 Feb 25.
10
Dissemination, Implementation, and Improvement Science Research in Population Health: Opportunities for Public Health and CTSAs.人群健康中的传播、实施与改进科学研究:公共卫生与临床和转化科学奖的机遇
Clin Transl Sci. 2015 Dec;8(6):807-13. doi: 10.1111/cts.12313. Epub 2015 Aug 3.

引用本文的文献

1
An agenda for science communication research and practice.科学传播研究与实践议程。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025 Jul 8;122(27):e2400932122. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2400932122. Epub 2025 Jun 30.
2
Characteristics of persons with varying vaccination personas: data from the CDC-funded PANDEMIC project.不同疫苗接种特征人群的特点:来自美国疾病控制与预防中心资助的大流行项目的数据。
Discov Public Health. 2025;22(1):326. doi: 10.1186/s12982-025-00703-6. Epub 2025 Jun 8.
3
Leveraging Technology to Engage Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Consumers With Children at Farmers Markets: Qualitative Community-Engaged Approach to App Development.利用技术让参与补充营养援助计划的有孩子的消费者在农贸市场参与活动:应用程序开发的定性社区参与方法
JMIR Form Res. 2025 May 16;9:e70104. doi: 10.2196/70104.
4
Improving the provision for gynaecological health care in Bangladesh using Essential Gynaecological Skills implementation package: a stakeholder-driven approach in public health facilities.使用基本妇科技能实施包改善孟加拉国的妇科医疗服务:公共卫生设施中利益相关方驱动的方法
J Glob Health. 2025 May 5;15:04132. doi: 10.7189/jogh.15.04132.
5
The importance of the integration of community engagement with biomedical informatics when assessing social determinants of health.在评估健康的社会决定因素时,将社区参与与生物医学信息学相结合的重要性。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2025 Mar 19;9(1):e53. doi: 10.1017/cts.2025.15. eCollection 2025.
6
Improving Community-Engaged Implementation Science: Perspectives From "Ending the HIV Epidemic" Supplement Award Cases in the United States.改进社区参与式实施科学:来自美国“终结艾滋病流行”补充奖励案例的视角
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2025 Apr 15;98(5S):e38-e47. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000003618.
7
Evidence adaptation and tailored implementation of family bereavement support in specialised palliative care: A multi-method study.专业姑息治疗中家庭丧亲之痛支持的证据适配与定制实施:一项多方法研究
Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2025 Feb 4;8:100305. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2025.100305. eCollection 2025 Jun.
8
All the voices we cannot hear: a taxonomy of why some populations' experiences are missing from health and care quality evidence and the Toolkit for Assessing Under Representation in User Surveys (TAURUS).我们听不到的所有声音:关于为何某些人群的经历在健康与护理质量证据中缺失的分类,以及用户调查中代表性不足评估工具包(TAURUS)。
BMJ Open. 2025 Feb 26;15(2):e087627. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-087627.
9
Harnessing Human-Centered Design for Evidence-Based Psychosocial Interventions and Implementation Strategies in Community Settings: Protocol for Redesign to Improve Usability, Engagement, and Appropriateness.在社区环境中利用以人为本的设计进行循证心理社会干预及实施策略:重新设计以提高可用性、参与度和适宜性的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Jan 29;14:e65446. doi: 10.2196/65446.
10
A mixed method study investigating the key translational competencies acquired during a challenge-based course.一项混合方法研究,调查在基于挑战的课程中获得的关键转化能力。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Dec 18;24(1):1439. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06473-0.

本文引用的文献

1
Situating dissemination and implementation sciences within and across the translational research spectrum.将传播与实施科学置于转化研究领域之内及跨领域范畴。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2019 Jul 29;4(3):152-158. doi: 10.1017/cts.2019.392.
2
A Community Engagement Advisory Board as a strategy to improve research engagement and build institutional capacity for community-engaged research.设立社区参与咨询委员会作为一种策略,以提高研究参与度并增强机构开展社区参与研究的能力。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2018 Aug 8;2(2):66-72. doi: 10.1017/cts.2018.14. eCollection 2018 Apr.
3
From community engagement, to community-engaged research, to broadly engaged team science.从社区参与,到社区参与式研究,再到广泛参与的团队科学。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2017 Apr 12;1(1):5-6. doi: 10.1017/cts.2017.1. eCollection 2017 Feb.
4
Development, implementation, and evaluation of a Community Engagement Advisory Board: Strategies for maximizing success.社区参与咨询委员会的发展、实施与评估:实现成功最大化的策略
J Clin Transl Sci. 2018 Feb;2(1):8-13. doi: 10.1017/cts.2018.13. Epub 2018 Jul 6.
5
Cooling The Hot Spots Where Child Hospitalization Rates Are High: A Neighborhood Approach To Population Health.为高热区降温:以社区为基础的人群健康方法降低儿童住院率。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2019 Sep;38(9):1433-1441. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2018.05496.
6
Adapting the James Lind Alliance priority setting process to better support patient participation: an example from cystic fibrosis.调整詹姆斯·林德联盟的优先事项设定流程以更好地支持患者参与:来自囊性纤维化的一个例子。
Res Involv Engagem. 2019 Aug 20;5:24. doi: 10.1186/s40900-019-0159-x. eCollection 2019.
7
Patient engagement to prioritise CF research: Inclusive or selective?患者参与以优先开展囊性纤维化研究:是包容性的还是选择性的?
J Cyst Fibros. 2019 May;18(3):307-308. doi: 10.1016/j.jcf.2019.04.006. Epub 2019 Apr 12.
8
Towards a practical model for community engagement: Advancing the art and science in academic health centers.迈向社区参与的实用模式:推进学术健康中心的艺术与科学。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2017 Oct;1(5):310-315. doi: 10.1017/cts.2017.304. Epub 2017 Dec 28.
9
Conceptualizing trust in community-academic research partnerships using concept mapping approach: A multi-CTSA study.使用概念图方法构建社区-学术研究伙伴关系中的信任概念:一项多CTSA研究。
Eval Program Plann. 2018 Feb;66:70-78. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2017.10.007. Epub 2017 Oct 12.
10
Methods guiding stakeholder engagement in planning a pragmatic study on changing stroke systems of care.指导利益相关者参与规划一项关于改变卒中护理系统的务实研究的方法。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2017 Apr;1(2):121-128. doi: 10.1017/cts.2016.26. Epub 2017 Feb 27.

参与式科学:传播、实施及转化研究科学的核心

Engagement science: The core of dissemination, implementation, and translational research science.

作者信息

Meissner Paul, Cottler Linda B, Eder Milton Mickey, Michener J Lloyd

机构信息

Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.

Clinical and Translational Science Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Transl Sci. 2020 Jan 20;4(3):216-218. doi: 10.1017/cts.2020.8.

DOI:10.1017/cts.2020.8
PMID:32695491
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7348030/
Abstract

Stakeholder engagement is acknowledged as central to dissemination and implementation (D&I) of research that generates and answers new clinical and health service research questions. There is both benefit and risk in conducting stakeholder engagement. Done wrong, it can damage trust and adversely impact study results, outcomes, and reputations. Done correctly with sensitivity, inclusion, and respect, it can significantly facilitate improvements in research prioritization, communication, design, recruitment strategies, and ultimately provide results useful to improve population and individual health. There is a recognized science of stakeholder engagement, but a general lack of knowledge that matches its strategies and approaches to particular populations of interest based on history and characteristics. This article reviews stakeholder engagement, provides several examples of its application across the range of translational research, and recommends that Clinical Translational Science Awards, with their unique geographical, systems, and historical characteristics, actively participate in deepening our understanding of stakeholder engagement science and methods within implementation and dissemination research. These recommendations include (a) development of an inventory of successful stakeholder engagement strategies; (b) coordination and intentionally testing a variety of stakeholder engagement strategies; (c) tool kit development; and (d) identification of fundamental motivators and logic models for stakeholder engagement to help align stakeholders and researchers.

摘要

利益相关者参与被认为是开展能够提出并回答新的临床和卫生服务研究问题的研究的传播与实施(D&I)的核心。进行利益相关者参与既有好处也有风险。如果做得不当,可能会损害信任并对研究结果、成果和声誉产生不利影响。如果以敏感、包容和尊重的态度正确开展,它可以显著促进研究优先级、沟通、设计、招募策略的改进,并最终提供有助于改善人群和个人健康的结果。利益相关者参与有一门公认的科学,但普遍缺乏根据历史和特征将其策略和方法与特定感兴趣人群相匹配的知识。本文回顾了利益相关者参与,提供了其在一系列转化研究中的应用示例,并建议临床转化科学奖凭借其独特的地理、系统和历史特征,积极参与深化我们对实施和传播研究中利益相关者参与科学和方法的理解。这些建议包括:(a)编制成功的利益相关者参与策略清单;(b)协调并有意测试各种利益相关者参与策略;(c)开发工具包;(d)确定利益相关者参与的基本动机和逻辑模型,以帮助使利益相关者和研究人员保持一致。