• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

传播创新:运用“现成诗”将研究结果反馈给面临癌症的患者及合作伙伴。

Dissemination innovation: Using found poetry to return study results to patients and partners facing cancer.

作者信息

Bybee Sara G, Eaton Jacqueline, Wong Bob

机构信息

University of Utah College of Nursing, 10 S 2000 E, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, United States of America.

出版信息

PEC Innov. 2024 May 7;4:100286. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2024.100286. eCollection 2024 Dec.

DOI:10.1016/j.pecinn.2024.100286
PMID:38770044
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11103570/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Investigators should return study results to patients and families facing cancer to honor their research contributions. We created a found poem from transcripts of sexual and gender minority (SGM) couples facing cancer and returned it to study participants.

METHODS

Participants were randomized to receive the found poem in text, text and audio, audio, or video format, completed dissemination preferences and emotion questionnaires, and open-ended questions about their experience receiving the poem.

RESULTS

Participants preferred the format they received ( = 15, 75.0%), with text-only and combined text and audio formats evoking the greatest number of emotions ( = 13 each). The following categories and subcategories were identified: dyadic experiences (support, strength, depth, durability); dissemination preferences (timing, method); emotion (positive, negative); utility of the found poem (affirming; fostering reflection; not useful or inaccurate, and sense of community). SGM participants utilized positive emotion, affirming, and a sense of community with greater frequency than non-SGM participants.

CONCLUSION

Innovative approaches to dissemination are acceptable; providing choices in how and when participants receive results may increase engagement; and SGM versus non-SGM groups may describe dyadic experiences differently.

INNOVATION

Returning study results via found poetry is an innovative way to honor research participants facing cancer.

摘要

目的

研究人员应将研究结果反馈给面临癌症的患者及其家属,以认可他们对研究的贡献。我们根据面临癌症的性少数群体(SGM)夫妇的访谈记录创作了一首拼贴诗,并将其反馈给研究参与者。

方法

参与者被随机分配接受文本、文本与音频、音频或视频格式的拼贴诗,完成关于传播偏好和情感的问卷,以及关于他们接收这首诗的体验的开放式问题。

结果

参与者更喜欢他们所接收的格式(n = 15,75.0%),仅文本格式以及文本与音频组合格式唤起的情感数量最多(各为n = 13)。确定了以下类别和子类别:二元体验(支持、力量、深度、持久性);传播偏好(时间、方式);情感(积极、消极);拼贴诗的效用(肯定;促进反思;无用或不准确,以及社区感)。SGM参与者比非SGM参与者更频繁地运用积极情感、肯定和社区感。

结论

创新的传播方式是可以接受的;在参与者接收结果的方式和时间上提供选择可能会提高参与度;并且SGM组与非SGM组对二元体验的描述可能不同。

创新点

通过拼贴诗反馈研究结果是认可面临癌症的研究参与者的一种创新方式。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/08d9/11103570/107f5b780464/gr2a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/08d9/11103570/97996112862d/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/08d9/11103570/107f5b780464/gr2a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/08d9/11103570/97996112862d/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/08d9/11103570/107f5b780464/gr2a.jpg

相似文献

1
Dissemination innovation: Using found poetry to return study results to patients and partners facing cancer.传播创新:运用“现成诗”将研究结果反馈给面临癌症的患者及合作伙伴。
PEC Innov. 2024 May 7;4:100286. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2024.100286. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
3
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
4
Adapting Safety Plans for Autistic Adults with Involvement from the Autism Community.在自闭症群体的参与下为成年自闭症患者调整安全计划。
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):293-302. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0124. eCollection 2025 Jun.
5
Prognostic factors for return to work in breast cancer survivors.乳腺癌幸存者恢复工作的预后因素。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 May 7;5(5):CD015124. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015124.pub2.
6
Can We Enhance Shared Decision-making for Periacetabular Osteotomy Surgery? A Qualitative Study of Patient Experiences.我们能否加强髋臼周围截骨术的共同决策?一项关于患者体验的定性研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jan 1;483(1):120-136. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003198. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
7
A Pilot Study of Political Experiences and Barriers to Voting Among Autistic Adults Participating in Online Survey Research in the United States.一项针对参与美国在线调查研究的成年自闭症患者的政治经历和投票障碍的试点研究。
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):261-272. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0119. eCollection 2025 Jun.
8
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
9
How lived experiences of illness trajectories, burdens of treatment, and social inequalities shape service user and caregiver participation in health and social care: a theory-informed qualitative evidence synthesis.疾病轨迹的生活经历、治疗负担和社会不平等如何影响服务使用者和照顾者参与健康和社会护理:一项基于理论的定性证据综合分析
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun;13(24):1-120. doi: 10.3310/HGTQ8159.
10
"I Don't Understand Their Sense of Belonging": Exploring How Nonbinary Autistic Adults Experience Gender.“我不理解他们的归属感”:探索非二元性别的自闭症成年人如何体验性别。
Autism Adulthood. 2024 Dec 2;6(4):462-473. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0071. eCollection 2024 Dec.

引用本文的文献

1
Current global practice and implications for future research on disseminating health research results to study participants: A systematic review.当前向研究参与者传播健康研究结果的全球实践及对未来研究的启示:一项系统综述。
PLoS Med. 2025 Aug 14;22(8):e1004569. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004569. eCollection 2025 Aug.

本文引用的文献

1
Posttraumatic growth and life course stress predict dyadic wellbeing among sexual and gender minority (SGM) and non-SGM couples facing cancer.创伤后成长和生活历程压力可预测面临癌症的性少数群体(SGM)和非 SGM 伴侣的夫妻幸福感。
Psychooncology. 2022 Nov;31(11):1860-1868. doi: 10.1002/pon.6036. Epub 2022 Sep 29.
2
Training researchers in dissemination of study results to research participants and communities.培训研究人员向研究参与者和社区传播研究结果。
Transl Behav Med. 2021 Jul 29;11(7):1411-1419. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibab023.
3
Assessing research participant preferences for receiving study results.
评估研究参与者对接收研究结果的偏好。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2019 Oct 4;4(3):243-249. doi: 10.1017/cts.2019.427.
4
Communicating and disseminating research findings to study participants: Formative assessment of participant and researcher expectations and preferences.向研究参与者传达和传播研究结果:对参与者和研究人员期望与偏好的形成性评估。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2020 Jan 20;4(3):233-242. doi: 10.1017/cts.2020.9.
5
The REDCap consortium: Building an international community of software platform partners.REDCap 联盟:构建软件平台合作伙伴的国际社区。
J Biomed Inform. 2019 Jul;95:103208. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103208. Epub 2019 May 9.
6
Health researchers' experiences, perceptions and barriers related to sharing study results with participants.健康研究人员在与参与者分享研究结果方面的经验、看法和障碍。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2019 Mar 4;17(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s12961-019-0422-5.
7
Self-report captures 27 distinct categories of emotion bridged by continuous gradients.自陈式评估捕捉到 27 种不同类别的情绪,这些情绪由连续的梯度连接。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Sep 19;114(38):E7900-E7909. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1702247114. Epub 2017 Sep 5.
8
Listening as a path to psychological discovery: an introduction to the Listening Guide.
Perspect Med Educ. 2017 Apr;6(2):76-81. doi: 10.1007/s40037-017-0335-3.
9
Health research participants' preferences for receiving research results.健康研究参与者对接收研究结果的偏好。
Clin Trials. 2016 Dec;13(6):582-591. doi: 10.1177/1740774516665598. Epub 2016 Aug 24.
10
'Conditional candour' and 'knowing me': an interpretive description study on patient preferences for physician behaviours during end-of-life communication.“有条件的坦诚”与“了解我”:一项关于临终沟通中患者对医生行为偏好的诠释性描述研究
BMJ Open. 2014 Oct 8;4(10):e005653. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005653.