Suppr超能文献

研究参与者的研究结果返还:数据访问、格式和共享偏好。

Returning study results to research participants: Data access, format, and sharing preferences.

机构信息

Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA; Department of Biobehavioral Nursing and Health Informatics, University of Washington School of Nursing, Seattle, WA, USA.

Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA; Columbia University School of Nursing, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

Int J Med Inform. 2023 Feb;170:104955. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104955. Epub 2022 Dec 13.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Research participants have a growing expectation for transparency with their collected information; however, there is little guidance on participant preferences for receiving health information and how researchers should return this information to participants.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional online survey with a representative sample of 502 participants in the United States. Participants were asked about their preferences for receiving, sharing, and the formatting of health information collected for research purposes.

RESULTS

Most participants wanted their health information returned (84 %) to use it for their own knowledge and to manage their own health. Email was the most preferred format for receiving health data (67 %), followed by online website (44 %), and/or paper copy (32 %). Data format preferences varied by age, education, financial resources, subjective numeracy, and health literacy. Around one third of Generation Z (25 %), Millennials (30 %), and Generation X (29 %) participants preferred to receive their health information with a mobile app. In contrast, very few Baby Boomers (12 %) and none from the Silent Generation preferred the mobile app format. Having a paper copy of the data was preferred by 38 % of participants without a college degree compared to those with a college degree. Preferences were highest for sharing all health information with doctors and nurses (77 %), and some information with friends and family (66 %).

CONCLUSION

Study findings support returning research information to participants in multiple formats, including email, online websites, and paper copy. Preferences for whom to share information with varied by stakeholders and by sociodemographic characteristics. Researchers should offer multiple formats to participants and tailor data sharing options to participants' preferences. Future research should further explore combinations of individual characteristics that may further influence data sharing and format preferences.

摘要

简介

研究参与者对其收集信息的透明度期望越来越高;然而,对于参与者对接收健康信息的偏好以及研究人员应如何将这些信息反馈给参与者,几乎没有指导意见。

方法

我们对美国的 502 名代表性参与者进行了一项横断面在线调查。参与者被问及他们对接收、分享和研究目的收集的健康信息格式的偏好。

结果

大多数参与者希望收到他们的健康信息(84%),以便用于自己的知识和管理自己的健康。电子邮件是接收健康数据的最受欢迎格式(67%),其次是在线网站(44%)和/或纸质副本(32%)。数据格式偏好因年龄、教育、经济资源、主观算术能力和健康素养而异。大约三分之一的 Z 世代(25%)、千禧一代(30%)和 X 世代(29%)参与者希望通过移动应用程序接收他们的健康信息。相比之下,婴儿潮一代(12%)和沉默一代(0%)很少有人喜欢移动应用程序格式。没有大学学历的参与者中有 38%更喜欢纸质副本,而有大学学历的参与者则没有。与没有大学学历的参与者相比,参与者最希望与医生和护士分享所有健康信息(77%),并与朋友和家人分享一些信息(66%)。

结论

研究结果支持以多种格式向参与者返还研究信息,包括电子邮件、在线网站和纸质副本。与谁分享信息的偏好因利益相关者和社会人口特征而异。研究人员应向参与者提供多种格式,并根据参与者的偏好定制数据共享选项。未来的研究应进一步探讨可能进一步影响数据共享和格式偏好的个体特征组合。

相似文献

1
Returning study results to research participants: Data access, format, and sharing preferences.
Int J Med Inform. 2023 Feb;170:104955. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104955. Epub 2022 Dec 13.
7
Health research participants' preferences for receiving research results.
Clin Trials. 2016 Dec;13(6):582-591. doi: 10.1177/1740774516665598. Epub 2016 Aug 24.
8
Assessing research participant preferences for receiving study results.
J Clin Transl Sci. 2019 Oct 4;4(3):243-249. doi: 10.1017/cts.2019.427.
9
Return of individual research results: What do participants prefer and expect?
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 29;16(7):e0254153. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254153. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

3
Returning individual wearable sensor results to participants: perspectives on challenges and lessons learned.
Front Digit Health. 2025 Mar 25;7:1569452. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2025.1569452. eCollection 2025.
4
Returning Individualized Wearable Sensor Results to Older Adult Research Participants: A Pilot Study.
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2025 Apr 7;80(5). doi: 10.1093/gerona/glaf027.
5
Using Patient Decision Aids for Cardiology Care in Diverse Populations.
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2023 Nov;25(11):1543-1553. doi: 10.1007/s11886-023-01953-z. Epub 2023 Nov 9.

本文引用的文献

2
Return of individual research results: What do participants prefer and expect?
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 29;16(7):e0254153. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254153. eCollection 2021.
3
Engagement and return of results preferences among a primarily African American genomic sequencing research cohort.
Am J Hum Genet. 2021 May 6;108(5):894-902. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2021.04.002. Epub 2021 Apr 21.
5
Understanding and Responding to Health Literacy as a Social Determinant of Health.
Annu Rev Public Health. 2021 Apr 1;42:159-173. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-090419-102529. Epub 2021 Oct 9.
6
Assessing research participant preferences for receiving study results.
J Clin Transl Sci. 2019 Oct 4;4(3):243-249. doi: 10.1017/cts.2019.427.
7
Broadband Internet Access Is a Social Determinant of Health!
Am J Public Health. 2020 Aug;110(8):1123-1125. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2020.305784.
8
Sharing Is Caring-Data Sharing Initiatives in Healthcare.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Apr 27;17(9):3046. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17093046.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验