Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Divison of Psychiatry II (Psychosomatic Medicine), Medical University Innsbruck, Anichstr. 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Divison of Psychiatry I, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
BMC Psychiatry. 2020 Jul 23;20(1):385. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-02787-7.
Patients with somatoform, depressive or anxiety disorders often don't respond well to medical treatment and experience many side effects. It is thus of clinical relevance to identify alternative, scientifically based, treatments. Our approach is based on the recent evidence that urbanicity has been shown to be associated with an increased risk for mental disorders. Conversely, green and blue environments show a dose-dependent beneficial impact on mental health.
Here we evaluate the effect of viewing stimuli of individuals in an alpine environment on emotional analytics in 183 patients with psychiatric disorders (mostly somatoform, depressive and anxiety disorders) and 315 healthy controls (HC). Emotional analytics (valence: unhappy vs happy, arousal: calm vs excited, dominance: controlled vs in control) were assessed using the Self-Assessment Manikin. Further parameters related to mental health and physical activity were recorded.
Emotional analytics of patients indicated that they felt less happy, less in control and had higher levels of arousal than HC when viewing neutral stimuli. The comparison alpine>neutral stimuli showed a significant positive effect of alpine stimuli on emotional analytics in both groups. Patients and HC both felt attracted to the scenes displayed in the alpine stimuli. Emotional analytics correlated positively with resilience and inversely with perceived stress.
Preventive and therapeutic programs for patients with somatoform, depressive and anxiety disorders should consider taking the benefits of natural outdoor environments, such as alpine environments, into account. Organizational barriers which are preventing the implementation of such programs in clinical practice need to be identified and addressed.
躯体形式障碍、抑郁或焦虑障碍患者通常对医学治疗反应不佳,并经历许多副作用。因此,识别替代的、基于科学的治疗方法具有临床意义。我们的方法基于最近的证据,即城市性与精神障碍的风险增加有关。相反,绿色和蓝色环境对心理健康有剂量依赖性的有益影响。
在这里,我们评估了观看高山环境中个体刺激对 183 名患有精神障碍(主要是躯体形式障碍、抑郁和焦虑障碍)和 315 名健康对照者(HC)情绪分析的影响。使用自我评估情绪分析图评估情绪分析(效价:不快乐与快乐,唤醒:平静与兴奋,优势:控制与失控)。记录与心理健康和身体活动相关的其他参数。
患者的情绪分析表明,与 HC 相比,他们在观看中性刺激时感到不快乐、不占优势且唤醒水平更高。高山>中性刺激的比较显示,高山刺激对两组的情绪分析都有显著的积极影响。患者和 HC 都对高山刺激中显示的场景感兴趣。情绪分析与韧性呈正相关,与感知压力呈负相关。
躯体形式障碍、抑郁和焦虑障碍患者的预防和治疗计划应考虑到自然户外环境(如高山环境)的益处。需要确定和解决在临床实践中实施此类计划的组织障碍。