• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于自然驾驶研究和驾驶员态度问卷分析的驾驶风险评估。

Driving risk assessment based on naturalistic driving study and driver attitude questionnaire analysis.

机构信息

State Key Laboratory of Automotive Safety and Energy, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.

School of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.

出版信息

Accid Anal Prev. 2020 Sep;145:105680. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105680. Epub 2020 Jul 21.

DOI:10.1016/j.aap.2020.105680
PMID:32707185
Abstract

Traffic accident statistics have shown the necessity of risk assessment when driving in the dynamic traffic environment. If the risk associated with different traffic elements (i.e., road, environment and vehicles) could be evaluated accurately, potential accidents could be significantly avoided or mitigated. This paper proposes a driving risk assessment model that can quantitatively evaluate the driving risk associated with intelligent vehicles via the coupled analysis of different traffic elements. First, we present a concept of the internal field and external field for establishing the driving risk coupling model, through employing the internal field to define the risk range of driver's perspective and the external field to calculate the risk coefficients of those traffic elements. Then, the relative risk coefficients are computed by incorporating both naturalistic driving study (NDS) and driver attitude questionnaire (DAQ) using a multinomial logit model. Specifically, we perform a large-scale naturalistic driving study to investigate the objective driving risks. Typical driver behavior parameters, such as velocity, time headway, and acceleration, are analyzed. Besides, a self-reported survey of 364 drivers is conducted to subjectively evaluate the potential risks that drivers may face in various situations. Finally, validation of the model is conducted by comparing the accuracy with the typical risk assessment index, i.e., TTC and THW. Results demonstrate that the proposed approach is effective in evaluating the comprehensive driving risks by quantifying the influence factors of driving risks in dynamic environments.

摘要

交通事故统计数据表明,在动态交通环境中驾驶时进行风险评估的必要性。如果能够准确评估与不同交通元素(即道路、环境和车辆)相关的风险,就可以显著避免或减轻潜在事故。本文提出了一种驾驶风险评估模型,通过对不同交通元素的耦合分析,可以定量评估与智能车辆相关的驾驶风险。首先,我们提出了内部场和外部场的概念,以建立驾驶风险耦合模型,通过内部场来定义驾驶员视角的风险范围,通过外部场来计算那些交通元素的风险系数。然后,通过使用多项逻辑回归模型结合自然驾驶研究(NDS)和驾驶员态度问卷(DAQ)来计算相对风险系数。具体来说,我们进行了大规模的自然驾驶研究来调查客观驾驶风险。分析了典型的驾驶员行为参数,如速度、时间间隔和加速度。此外,我们还对 364 名驾驶员进行了一份自我报告调查,以主观评估驾驶员在各种情况下可能面临的潜在风险。最后,通过与典型风险评估指标(即 TTC 和 THW)进行比较来验证模型的准确性。结果表明,该方法通过量化动态环境中驾驶风险的影响因素,有效地评估了综合驾驶风险。

相似文献

1
Driving risk assessment based on naturalistic driving study and driver attitude questionnaire analysis.基于自然驾驶研究和驾驶员态度问卷分析的驾驶风险评估。
Accid Anal Prev. 2020 Sep;145:105680. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105680. Epub 2020 Jul 21.
2
Road traffic accidents and self-reported Portuguese car driver's attitudes, behaviors, and opinions: Are they related?道路交通事故与葡萄牙汽车驾驶员自我报告的态度、行为和观点:它们之间有关联吗?
Traffic Inj Prev. 2016 Oct 2;17(7):705-11. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2016.1150591. Epub 2016 Feb 18.
3
Quantifying visual road environment to establish a speeding prediction model: An examination using naturalistic driving data.量化视觉道路环境以建立超速预测模型:使用自然驾驶数据的检验。
Accid Anal Prev. 2019 Aug;129:289-298. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2019.05.011. Epub 2019 Jun 6.
4
How to identify the key factors that affect driver perception of accident risk. A comparison between Italian and Spanish driver behavior.如何识别影响驾驶员感知事故风险的关键因素。意大利和西班牙驾驶员行为的比较。
Accid Anal Prev. 2014 Dec;73:225-35. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2014.09.020. Epub 2014 Sep 21.
5
Individual driver risk assessment using naturalistic driving data.利用自然驾驶数据进行驾驶员个体风险评估。
Accid Anal Prev. 2013 Dec;61:3-9. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2012.06.014. Epub 2012 Jul 9.
6
Modelling driver propensity for traffic accidents: a comparison of multiple regression analysis and fuzzy approach.驾驶倾向性与交通事故建模:多元回归分析与模糊方法的比较。
Int J Inj Contr Saf Promot. 2020 Jun;27(2):156-167. doi: 10.1080/17457300.2019.1690002. Epub 2019 Nov 13.
7
A driver behavior assessment and recommendation system for connected vehicles to produce safer driving environments through a "follow the leader" approach.面向车联网的驾驶员行为评估和推荐系统,通过“跟随领头羊”的方法,营造更安全的驾驶环境。
Accid Anal Prev. 2020 May;139:105460. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105460. Epub 2020 Mar 2.
8
How do drivers overtake pedestrians? Evidence from field test and naturalistic driving data.驾驶员如何超越行人?来自现场测试和自然驾驶数据的证据。
Accid Anal Prev. 2020 May;139:105494. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105494. Epub 2020 Mar 20.
9
Driver behavior analysis for right-turn drivers at signalized intersections using SHRP 2 naturalistic driving study data.基于 SHRP 2 自然驾驶研究数据的信号交叉口右转驾驶员行为分析。
J Safety Res. 2017 Dec;63:177-185. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2017.10.010. Epub 2017 Oct 19.
10
Age and gender differences in time to collision at braking from the 100-Car Naturalistic Driving Study.来自100辆汽车自然驾驶研究的制动时碰撞时间的年龄和性别差异。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2014;15 Suppl 1:S15-20. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2014.928703.

引用本文的文献

1
Collision risk analysis in the merging area of interchanges using Monte Carlo traffic simulation.使用蒙特卡洛交通模拟对互通式立交合流区域的碰撞风险分析
PLoS One. 2025 Sep 15;20(9):e0330224. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0330224. eCollection 2025.
2
Optimal Duration of In-Vehicle Data Recorder Monitoring to Assess Bus Driver Behavior.评估公交车驾驶员行为的车载数据记录仪监测最佳持续时间。
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Nov 1;23(21):8887. doi: 10.3390/s23218887.
3
Review of Research on Road Traffic Operation Risk Prevention and Control.道路交通安全运行风险防控研究述评
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 25;19(19):12115. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191912115.
4
Data-Driven Estimation of a Driving Safety Tolerance Zone Using Imbalanced Machine Learning.基于不平衡机器学习的数据驱动驾驶安全容忍区估计。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Jul 15;22(14):5309. doi: 10.3390/s22145309.
5
Driving Risk Assessment Using Near-Miss Events Based on Panel Poisson Regression and Panel Negative Binomial Regression.基于面板泊松回归和面板负二项回归的使用未遂事件进行驾驶风险评估
Entropy (Basel). 2021 Jun 29;23(7):829. doi: 10.3390/e23070829.