Suppr超能文献

耳鸣患者 Stroop 色词干扰测验-TBAG 形式表现的评估。

Assessment of Stroop Color Word Interference Test-TBAG form performance in subjects with tinnitus.

机构信息

Ankara Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.

Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Audiology, Ankara Yildirim Beyazit University, 06010, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2021 May;278(5):1403-1409. doi: 10.1007/s00405-020-06221-2. Epub 2020 Jul 24.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate ordinary behavioral pattern suppression performance of individuals with tinnitus under disruptive effect using Stroop Color Word Interference Test-TBAG Form (SCWT), and to determine the impact of acoustic stimulus on this performance.

METHODS

40 individuals with subjective tinnitus at Slight and higher severity according to Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI) (16 females, 24 males; mean age: 42.02 ± 10.00) (Study group), and 40 healthy individuals (Control group) (18 females, 22 males; mean age: 38.85 ± 10.25) were included in this study. All individuals were subjected to audiological evaluation. SCWT was applied with and without acoustic stimulus (NB noise), and test completion durations were recorded.

RESULTS

It was determined that the duration for completion of 5 sections of SCWT, both in the presence of and without acoustic stimulus, was longer in the Study group than the control group. In the presence of acoustic stimulus, it took longer for the individuals with tinnitus to complete sections 4 and 5, and the control group to complete sections 3, 4 and 5 in SCWT in comparison with the lack of acoustic stimulus.

CONCLUSION

It was determined that SCWT performance of the individuals with tinnitus was worse than the individuals without tinnitus, both in the presence of and without acoustic stimulus. It was found that SCWT performances of both groups with acoustic stimulus were better than their test performances without acoustic stimulus.

摘要

目的

使用 Stroop 颜色词干扰测试-TBAG 形式(SCWT)评估有耳鸣个体在干扰效应下的普通行为模式抑制表现,并确定声音刺激对这种表现的影响。

方法

根据耳鸣残疾量表(THI),将 40 名轻度及以上严重程度的主观耳鸣个体(16 名女性,24 名男性;平均年龄:42.02±10.00)(研究组)和 40 名健康个体(对照组)(18 名女性,22 名男性;平均年龄:38.85±10.25)纳入本研究。所有个体均接受了听力评估。在有和没有声音刺激(NB 噪声)的情况下进行了 SCWT 测试,并记录了测试完成时间。

结果

研究组完成 SCWT 的 5 个部分的时间,无论是在有声音刺激还是没有声音刺激的情况下,都比对照组长。在有声音刺激的情况下,耳鸣个体完成第 4 节和第 5 节所需的时间比对照组长,而对照组在没有声音刺激的情况下完成第 3 节、第 4 节和第 5 节所需的时间比对照组长。

结论

无论是否存在声音刺激,耳鸣个体的 SCWT 表现都比无耳鸣个体差。发现两组在有声音刺激时的 SCWT 表现均优于无声音刺激时的测试表现。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验