Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Am J Prev Med. 2020 Sep;59(3):412-419. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2020.03.029. Epub 2020 Jul 23.
Associations between time spent on physical activity, sedentary behavior, and sleep and quality of life are usually studied without considering that their combined time is fixed. This study investigates the reallocation of time spent on physical activity, sedentary behavior, and sleep during the 24-hour day and their associations with quality of life.
Data from the 2011-2016 Rotterdam Study were used to perform this cross-sectional analysis among 1,934 participants aged 51-94 years. Time spent in activity levels (sedentary, light-intensity physical activity, moderate-to-vigorous physical activity, and sleep) were objectively measured with a wrist-worn accelerometer combined with a sleep diary. Quality of life was measured using the EuroQoL 5D-3L questionnaire. The compositional isotemporal substitution method was used in 2018 to examine the association between the distribution of time spent in different activity behaviors and quality of life.
Reallocation of 30 minutes from sedentary behavior, light-intensity physical activity, or sleep to moderate-to-vigorous physical activity was associated with a higher quality of life, whereas reallocation from moderate-to-vigorous physical activity to sedentary behavior, light-intensity physical activity, or sleep was associated with lower quality of life. To illustrate this, a reallocation of 30 minutes from sedentary behavior to moderate-to-vigorous physical activity was associated with a 3% (95% CI=2, 4) higher quality of life score. By contrast, a reallocation of 30 minutes from moderate-to-vigorous physical activity to sedentary behavior was associated with a 4% (95% CI=2, 6) lower quality of life score.
Moderate-to-vigorous physical activity is important with regard to the quality of life of middle-aged and elderly individuals. The benefits of preventing less time spent in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity were greater than the benefits of more time spent in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity. These results could shift the attention to interventions focused on preventing reductions in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity levels. Further longitudinal studies are needed to confirm these findings and explore causality.
通常,在研究体力活动、久坐行为和睡眠与生活质量之间的关系时,并未考虑到它们的总时间是固定的。本研究旨在调查 24 小时内体力活动、久坐行为和睡眠时间的重新分配及其与生活质量的关系。
本横断面研究使用了 2011-2016 年鹿特丹研究的数据,纳入了 1934 名年龄在 51-94 岁的参与者。使用佩戴在手腕上的加速度计结合睡眠日记客观测量活动水平(久坐、低强度体力活动、中高强度体力活动和睡眠)的时间。使用 EuroQoL 5D-3L 问卷测量生活质量。2018 年采用组成等时替代法研究不同活动行为的时间分配与生活质量之间的关系。
将 30 分钟的久坐时间、低强度体力活动时间或睡眠时间重新分配到中高强度体力活动中与更高的生活质量相关,而将 30 分钟的中高强度体力活动时间重新分配到久坐时间、低强度体力活动时间或睡眠时间中则与更低的生活质量相关。例如,将 30 分钟的久坐时间重新分配到中高强度体力活动中与生活质量评分提高 3%(95%CI=2,4)相关。相比之下,将 30 分钟的中高强度体力活动时间重新分配到久坐时间中与生活质量评分降低 4%(95%CI=2,6)相关。
对于中老年人的生活质量而言,中高强度体力活动很重要。预防中高强度体力活动时间减少的益处大于增加中高强度体力活动时间的益处。这些结果可能会促使人们关注预防中高强度体力活动水平降低的干预措施。需要进一步的纵向研究来证实这些发现并探索因果关系。