Suppr超能文献

新型马粪便虫卵诊断方法:FECPAK的验证

Novel Equine Faecal Egg Diagnostics: Validation of the FECPAK.

作者信息

Tyson Fiona, Dalesman Sarah, Brophy Peter M, Morphew Russell M

机构信息

Institute of Biological, Environmental and Rural Sciences, Aberystwyth University, Aberystwyth SY23 3DA, UK.

出版信息

Animals (Basel). 2020 Jul 23;10(8):1254. doi: 10.3390/ani10081254.

Abstract

Faecal egg counts (FECs) are the standard method of diagnosing the level of parasitic helminth egg shedding in horses and other grazing animals. Testing before treatment is an important factor in slowing the appearance of anthelmintic resistance in nematode parasites. The FECPAK, optimised for livestock, is reported to allow owners to perform FECs on their own animals without the need for a separate microscope or any specialist knowledge by tapping into remote expertise. However, the performance of the FECPAK has yet to be assessed for equids. Therefore, a comparison of the FECPAK (G2) method with an accepted equine FEC method (FECPAK(G1)) was performed, using faecal samples from 57 horses in Wales and 22 horses in New Zealand. There was a significant correlation between the FECs obtained by the two methods ( < 0.001) and no effect of the country of origin on the data ( = 0.157). The mean percentage accuracy compared to the control values (mean G2 count as a percentage of the mean G1 count, ±SStandard Error (SE)) was 101 ± 4%. There was no significant interaction between the method applied and the country of origin of the data ( = 0.814). The relative accuracy of the G2 method compared to the control method (FECPAK) was not affected by the level of infection ( = 0.124) and it was concluded that the FECPAK method is a suitable method of performing FECs in horses. It is anticipated that the user-friendliness of the method will increase the uptake of FECs amongst horse owners, either by the direct use of the technology or through their veterinary practice, likely slowing the development of anthelmintic resistance.

摘要

粪便虫卵计数(FECs)是诊断马匹和其他放牧动物体内寄生蠕虫虫卵排出水平的标准方法。治疗前进行检测是减缓线虫寄生虫抗驱虫药现象出现的一个重要因素。据报道,针对家畜进行了优化的FECPAK,能让畜主在无需单独显微镜或任何专业知识的情况下,通过借助远程专业知识对自己的动物进行粪便虫卵计数。然而,FECPAK在马类动物中的性能尚未得到评估。因此,使用来自威尔士的57匹马和新西兰的22匹马的粪便样本,对FECPAK(G2)方法与公认的马类粪便虫卵计数方法(FECPAK(G1))进行了比较。两种方法获得的粪便虫卵计数之间存在显著相关性(<0.001),且数据的原产国对结果无影响(=0.157)。与对照值相比的平均准确率(平均G2计数占平均G1计数的百分比,±标准误差(SE))为101±4%。所应用的方法与数据的原产国之间没有显著交互作用(=0.814)。G2方法相对于对照方法(FECPAK)的相对准确率不受感染水平的影响(=0.124),得出结论FECPAK方法是在马匹中进行粪便虫卵计数的合适方法。预计该方法的用户友好性将通过技术的直接使用或通过兽医实践增加马主对粪便虫卵计数的采用,可能减缓抗驱虫药耐药性的发展。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ac0/7459939/d157f165f173/animals-10-01254-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验