• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急症机器人修复嵌顿性腹侧和切口疝的围手术期和中期结果。

Perioperative and midterm outcomes of emergent robotic repair of incarcerated ventral and incisional hernia.

机构信息

Good Samaritan Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, One Pearl Street, Brockton, MA, 02301, USA.

出版信息

J Robot Surg. 2021 Jun;15(3):473-481. doi: 10.1007/s11701-020-01130-2. Epub 2020 Jul 28.

DOI:10.1007/s11701-020-01130-2
PMID:32725328
Abstract

The literature surrounding emergent robotic ventral hernia repair (RVHR) is scarce. We aimed to present the results of 6 years of experience of RVHR in the emergency setting. Data were retrospectively analyzed from patients who underwent RVHR in an emergent setting between 2013 and 2019. Complications were assessed with the Clavien-Dindo (CD) and Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI) scoring systems. Kaplan-Meier's time-to-event analysis was performed to calculate freedom-of-recurrence. Out of 589 patients who underwent RVHR, 34 patients were included. Median APACHE-II scores were 6.5. The average skin-to-skin time was 139 min. 7/34(20.5%) patients experienced minor complications (CD-grades I-II) and 4/34 (11.7%) patients experienced major complications (CD-grades III-IV). CCI scores ranged from 0-42.4. Only one (2.9%) patient experienced hernia recurrence. The mean postoperative follow-up was 20.5 (range 1.6-56.3) months. Emergent RVHR showed promising results in terms of midterm outcomes and overall feasibility. RVHR appears to be effective in emergency settings, however, further multicenter studies with long-term follow-up are needed.

摘要

机器人紧急腹外疝修补术(RVHR)的相关文献较少。我们旨在报告 6 年来在急诊环境下进行 RVHR 的经验结果。对 2013 年至 2019 年在急诊环境下接受 RVHR 的患者进行回顾性数据分析。采用 Clavien-Dindo(CD)和综合并发症指数(CCI)评分系统评估并发症。采用 Kaplan-Meier 时间事件分析计算复发率。在 589 例行 RVHR 的患者中,纳入 34 例患者。平均急性生理与慢性健康评分(APACHE-II)为 6.5。平均皮肤到皮肤时间为 139 分钟。7/34(20.5%)例患者出现轻微并发症(CD 分级 I-II),4/34(11.7%)例患者出现严重并发症(CD 分级 III-IV)。CCI 评分范围为 0-42.4。仅有 1 例(2.9%)患者出现疝复发。平均术后随访时间为 20.5 个月(范围 1.6-56.3)。紧急 RVHR 在中期结果和整体可行性方面显示出良好的效果。RVHR 在急诊环境中似乎是有效的,但需要进一步进行长期随访的多中心研究。

相似文献

1
Perioperative and midterm outcomes of emergent robotic repair of incarcerated ventral and incisional hernia.急症机器人修复嵌顿性腹侧和切口疝的围手术期和中期结果。
J Robot Surg. 2021 Jun;15(3):473-481. doi: 10.1007/s11701-020-01130-2. Epub 2020 Jul 28.
2
Robotic ventral hernia repair in morbidly obese patients: perioperative and mid-term outcomes.机器人辅助肥胖患者腹疝修补术:围手术期和中期结果。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Aug;34(8):3540-3549. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07142-w. Epub 2019 Oct 3.
3
Robotic ventral hernia repair in octogenarians: perioperative and long-term outcomes.机器人辅助下的 80 岁以上老年人腹外疝修补术:围手术期和长期结果。
J Robot Surg. 2020 Apr;14(2):275-281. doi: 10.1007/s11701-019-00979-2. Epub 2019 May 29.
4
Robotic-assisted ventral and incisional hernia repair with hernia defect closure and intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) experience.机器人辅助腹侧和切口疝修补术,包括疝缺损闭合和腹膜内补片植入(IPOM)经验。
J Robot Surg. 2020 Oct;14(5):695-701. doi: 10.1007/s11701-019-01040-y. Epub 2020 Jan 2.
5
Robotic Ventral Hernia Repair and Concomitant Procedures: Mid-term Outcomes and Risk Factors Associated With Postoperative Complications.机器人辅助腹疝修补术及同期手术:中期结果及与术后并发症相关的危险因素
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2023 Feb 1;33(1):27-30. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000001140.
6
Propensity score matching analysis of short-term outcomes in robotic ventral hernia repair for patients with a body mass index above and below 35 kg/m.体重指数高于和低于35kg/m²的患者行机器人腹疝修补术短期结局的倾向评分匹配分析
Hernia. 2021 Feb;25(1):115-123. doi: 10.1007/s10029-019-02108-2. Epub 2019 Dec 16.
7
Reducing Length of Stay Using a Robotic-assisted Approach for Retromuscular Ventral Hernia Repair: A Comparative Analysis From the Americas Hernia Society Quality Collaborative.使用机器人辅助方法减少Retromuscular 腹疝修补术的住院时间:来自美洲疝学会质量合作组织的比较分析。
Ann Surg. 2018 Feb;267(2):210-217. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002244.
8
Robotic-assisted and laparoscopic hernia repair: real-world evidence from the Americas Hernia Society Quality Collaborative (AHSQC).机器人辅助和腹腔镜疝修补术:来自美洲疝学会质量合作组织(AHSQC)的真实世界证据。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Mar;35(3):1331-1341. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07511-w. Epub 2020 Mar 31.
9
Robotic retromuscular ventral hernia repair and transversus abdominis release: short-term outcomes and risk factors associated with perioperative complications.机器人辅助肌后腹侧疝修补术及腹横肌松解术:围手术期并发症的短期结局及相关危险因素
Hernia. 2019 Apr;23(2):375-385. doi: 10.1007/s10029-019-01911-1. Epub 2019 Feb 15.
10
A comparison of clinical outcomes and costs between robotic and open ventral hernia repair.机器人与开放式腹疝修补术的临床结果和成本比较。
Am J Surg. 2023 Jul;226(1):87-92. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2023.01.031. Epub 2023 Feb 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Current evidence and reported experiences for robot-assisted emergency general surgery: systematic review.机器人辅助急诊普通外科手术的当前证据及报告经验:系统评价
J Robot Surg. 2025 Aug 30;19(1):534. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02696-5.
2
Safety and feasibility of robotic surgery in acute care setting: a systematic review.机器人手术在急症护理环境中的安全性和可行性:一项系统评价。
J Robot Surg. 2025 Aug 6;19(1):454. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02630-9.
3
Robotic retromuscular hernia repair optimizes short-term outcomes in higher risk patients.

本文引用的文献

1
Update of Guidelines for laparoscopic treatment of ventral and incisional abdominal wall hernias (International Endohernia Society (IEHS))-Part A.腹腔镜治疗腹前壁和切口疝指南更新(国际腹内疝学会(IEHS))-A 部分。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Oct;33(10):3069-3139. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06907-7. Epub 2019 Jun 27.
2
Short-term comparison between preperitoneal and intraperitoneal onlay mesh placement in robotic ventral hernia repair.机器人腹疝修补术中腹膜前和腹腔内补片放置的短期比较。
Hernia. 2019 Oct;23(5):957-967. doi: 10.1007/s10029-019-01946-4. Epub 2019 Apr 9.
3
Robotic retromuscular ventral hernia repair and transversus abdominis release: short-term outcomes and risk factors associated with perioperative complications.
机器人辅助肌后疝修补术可优化高风险患者的短期治疗效果。
Surg Endosc. 2025 May;39(5):2828-2835. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11630-7. Epub 2025 Mar 10.
4
Investigating surgeon performance metrics as key predictors of robotic herniorrhaphy outcomes using iterative machine learning models: retrospective study.使用迭代机器学习模型研究外科医生表现指标作为机器人疝修补术结果的关键预测因素:一项回顾性研究。
BJS Open. 2024 Dec 30;9(1). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrae160.
5
Mapping the therapeutic landscape in emergency incisional hernia: a scoping review.绘制急诊切口疝的治疗前景:一项范围综述
Hernia. 2025 Feb 18;29(1):102. doi: 10.1007/s10029-025-03278-y.
6
Application and exploration of interprofessional education in the teaching of plastic and reconstructive surgery: a narrative review.整形与重建外科教学中跨专业教育的应用与探索:一项叙述性综述
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Dec 20;24(1):1501. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06423-w.
7
Emergency robotic surgery: the experience of a single center and review of the literature.紧急机器人手术:单中心经验及文献复习。
World J Emerg Surg. 2024 Aug 17;19(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s13017-024-00555-6.
8
Robotic-assisted treatment of paraesophageal hernias in the emergency setting: a retrospective study.机器人辅助治疗食管旁疝的紧急情况:一项回顾性研究。
J Robot Surg. 2024 May 29;18(1):228. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-01975-x.
9
Robotic operations in urgent general surgery: a systematic review.机器人在紧急普通外科手术中的应用:系统综述。
J Robot Surg. 2023 Apr;17(2):275-290. doi: 10.1007/s11701-022-01425-6. Epub 2022 Jun 21.
10
Knowledge, attitude, and practice of artificial intelligence in emergency and trauma surgery, the ARIES project: an international web-based survey.人工智能在急诊和创伤外科中的知识、态度和实践,ARIES 项目:一项国际网络调查。
World J Emerg Surg. 2022 Feb 10;17(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s13017-022-00413-3.
机器人辅助肌后腹侧疝修补术及腹横肌松解术:围手术期并发症的短期结局及相关危险因素
Hernia. 2019 Apr;23(2):375-385. doi: 10.1007/s10029-019-01911-1. Epub 2019 Feb 15.
4
Emergent Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repairs.急诊腹腔镜腹疝修补术
J Surg Res. 2018 Dec;232:497-502. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2018.07.034. Epub 2018 Aug 2.
5
Laparoscopic versus open emergent ventral hernia repair: utilization and outcomes analysis using the ACSNSQIP database.腹腔镜与开腹紧急腹疝修补术的比较:使用 ACSNSQIP 数据库进行利用和结果分析。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Dec;32(12):4999-5005. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6312-z. Epub 2018 Jun 29.
6
Feasibility of Robotic-Assisted Transabdominal Preperitoneal Ventral Hernia Repair.机器人辅助经腹腹膜前腹疝修补术的可行性
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2018 Apr;28(4):434-438. doi: 10.1089/lap.2017.0595. Epub 2018 Jan 2.
7
2017 update of the WSES guidelines for emergency repair of complicated abdominal wall hernias.2017 年 WSES 复杂腹壁疝急诊修复指南更新版。
World J Emerg Surg. 2017 Aug 7;12:37. doi: 10.1186/s13017-017-0149-y. eCollection 2017.
8
Comparative analysis of perioperative outcomes of robotic versus open transversus abdominis release.机器人与开放腹横肌释放术的围手术期结果比较分析。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Feb;32(2):840-845. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5752-1. Epub 2017 Jul 21.
9
Laparoscopic vs Robotic Intraperitoneal Mesh Repair for Incisional Hernia: An Americas Hernia Society Quality Collaborative Analysis.腹腔镜与机器人腹膜内补片修补切口疝:美国疝学会质量协作分析
J Am Coll Surg. 2017 Aug;225(2):285-293. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2017.04.011. Epub 2017 Apr 24.
10
Comparative analysis of biologic versus synthetic mesh outcomes in contaminated hernia repairs.污染性疝修补术中生物补片与合成补片效果的对比分析。
Surgery. 2016 Oct;160(4):828-838. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.04.041. Epub 2016 Jul 21.