Department of Psychology, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ.
Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University-Bloomington, Bloomington, IN.
Sleep. 2021 Jan 21;44(1). doi: 10.1093/sleep/zsaa142.
Children's poor sleep is a risk factor for lower cognitive functioning and internalizing and externalizing problems. It is unclear whether genetic and environmental influences vary based on sleep assessment and no studies to date have examined genetic and environmental contributions to links between multiple objective and subjective sleep indicators. Further, nearly all heritability studies rely on subjective parent- or self-report measures of sleep duration and problems. Given these gaps in the literature, we (1) modeled genetic and environmental influences on multiple objective and subjective sleep indicators and (2) estimated genetic and environmental covariances between objective and subjective sleep indicators in middle childhood. Participants were 608 twin children (MZ = 178, same-sex DZ = 234, opposite-sex DZ = 190) assessed at 8 years of age (SD = 0.63 years). Objective nighttime sleep duration, efficiency, sleep onset latency (SOL), midpoint time, and midpoint variability were collected from actigraph watches worn for 7 nights (Mnights = 6.83, SD = 0.62). Children's nighttime sleep duration and daytime sleepiness were assessed via parent report. Findings suggested high additive genetic influence on objective sleep quantity and quality, whereas objective SOL, sleep midpoint time, midpoint variability, parent-reported sleep duration, and daytime sleepiness were largely influenced by the shared environment. Common genetic factors explained associations between objective sleep quantity and quality, but genetics did not account for links with parent-reported sleep duration, midpoint time, or midpoint variability. Thus, objective and parent-reported assessments of children's sleep have unique genetic etiologies and should not be used interchangeably in the sleep literature.
儿童睡眠质量差是认知功能降低以及内化和外化问题的一个风险因素。目前尚不清楚遗传和环境因素是否会因睡眠评估而有所不同,也没有研究探讨过遗传和环境因素对多个客观和主观睡眠指标之间联系的贡献。此外,几乎所有的遗传力研究都依赖于父母或自己对睡眠时间和问题的主观报告测量。鉴于文献中的这些空白,我们(1)对多个客观和主观睡眠指标的遗传和环境影响进行建模,(2)估计了儿童中期客观和主观睡眠指标之间的遗传和环境协方差。参与者是 608 对双胞胎儿童(MZ = 178,同性别 DZ = 234,异性别 DZ = 190),在 8 岁时(SD = 0.63 岁)进行评估。通过佩戴活动记录仪手表连续 7 晚收集客观的夜间睡眠时间、效率、睡眠潜伏期(SOL)、中点时间和中点变异性(Mnights = 6.83,SD = 0.62)。通过父母报告评估儿童的夜间睡眠时间和日间嗜睡情况。研究结果表明,客观睡眠数量和质量受高度累加遗传影响,而客观 SOL、睡眠中点时间、中点变异性、父母报告的睡眠时间和日间嗜睡主要受共享环境影响。共同的遗传因素解释了客观睡眠数量和质量之间的关联,但遗传因素并未解释与父母报告的睡眠时间、中点时间或中点变异性之间的联系。因此,儿童睡眠的客观和父母报告评估具有独特的遗传病因,不应在睡眠文献中互换使用。