Suppr超能文献

社会经济地位对 COVID-19 感染住院患者 30 天死亡率的影响。

The impact of socioeconomic status on 30-day mortality in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 infection.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University Hospital Hairmyres, East Kilbride, Scotland, UK.

出版信息

J Med Virol. 2021 Feb;93(2):995-1001. doi: 10.1002/jmv.26371. Epub 2020 Aug 13.

Abstract

Socioeconomic status (SES) impacts outcome in a number of diseases. Our aim was to compare the outcome of hospitalized coronavirus disease 219 (COVID-19) patients in low and high SES group. Prospective cohort study of hospitalized patients with confirmed COVID-19 in three acute hospitals. Electronic case notes were analyzed for baseline characteristics and admission investigations. Scottish index for multiple deprivation (SIMD) was used to divide patients into two groups: more deprived (SIMD 1-5) and less deprived (SIMD 6-10) and results compared. Poor outcome was defined as either need for intubation and/or death. One hundred and seventy-three patients were identified, one was excluded. One hundred and eight (62.8%) were males, mean age was 68.5 ± 14.7 years. Commonest comorbidity was hypertension 87 (50.6%). One hundred and seventeen (68.0%) patients were in more deprived group. Baseline characteristics, admission blood profile and reason for admission were evenly matched in both groups. Outcomes were comparable in both groups: transfer to critical care (27.4% vs 27.3%; P = .991), intubation (18.8% vs 20.2%; P = .853), 30-day all-cause mortality (19.7% vs 14.5%; P = .416) and overall poor outcome (30.8% vs 30.9%; P = .985). Median time to discharge was 7 days longer (17 vs 10 days; P = .018) and median time to death was 4.5 days longer in more deprived group (17 vs 12.5 days; P = .388). Contrary to recent literature on COVID-19 in other geographical areas, our study suggests that the SES does not have any impact on outcome of hospitalized patients with COVID-19, however it negatively impacts length of stay.

摘要

社会经济地位(SES)会影响许多疾病的预后。我们的目的是比较低 SES 和高 SES 组住院的 219 型冠状病毒病(COVID-19)患者的预后。这是一项前瞻性队列研究,纳入了三家急性医院住院的 COVID-19 确诊患者。对电子病例记录进行了基线特征和入院检查的分析。使用苏格兰贫困程度指数(SIMD)将患者分为两组:更贫困(SIMD 1-5)和不那么贫困(SIMD 6-10),并对结果进行了比较。不良预后定义为需要插管和/或死亡。共确定了 173 名患者,其中 1 名被排除。108 名(62.8%)为男性,平均年龄为 68.5±14.7 岁。最常见的合并症是高血压 87 例(50.6%)。117 例(68.0%)患者处于更贫困的组。两组的基线特征、入院时的血液指标和入院原因均相似。两组的预后结果相当:转入重症监护病房的比例(27.4% vs 27.3%;P=0.991)、插管的比例(18.8% vs 20.2%;P=0.853)、30 天全因死亡率(19.7% vs 14.5%;P=0.416)和整体不良预后(30.8% vs 30.9%;P=0.985)。更贫困组的出院时间中位数延长了 7 天(17 天 vs 10 天;P=0.018),死亡时间中位数延长了 4.5 天(17 天 vs 12.5 天;P=0.388)。与最近关于其他地理区域 COVID-19 的文献相反,我们的研究表明,SES 对住院 COVID-19 患者的预后没有任何影响,但会对住院时间产生负面影响。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验