Department of Sport Science, University of Konstanz, 78464 Konstanz, Germany.
Department of Educational Psychology, University of Bern, 3012 Bern, Switzerland.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jul 28;17(15):5420. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17155420.
Social distancing during the coronavirus-disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is crucial to reduce the spread of the virus. However, its effectiveness hinges on adherence by individuals who face substantial burdens from the required behavioral restrictions. Here, we investigate sources of individual variation in adhering to social distancing guidelines. In a high-powered study ( = 895), we tested direct and indirect effects of boredom and self-control on adherence. The results showed that both traits were important predictors of adherence but the underlying mechanisms differed. Specifically, individuals high in boredom perceived social distancing as more difficult, which in turn reduced their adherence (i.e., a mediated effect). In contrast, individuals high in self-control adhered more to the guidelines without perceiving them as more or less difficult; however, self-control moderated the effect of difficulty on adherence. Our results are immediately relevant to improve the efficacy of social distancing guidelines in the COVID-19 response.
在 2019 冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行期间保持社交距离对于减少病毒传播至关重要。然而,其有效性取决于个人的遵守情况,因为他们面临着因必要的行为限制而带来的巨大负担。在这里,我们研究了个体遵守社交距离指南的差异来源。在一项高影响力的研究中(n = 895),我们测试了无聊和自我控制对遵守情况的直接和间接影响。结果表明,这两种特质都是遵守的重要预测因素,但潜在的机制不同。具体来说,感到无聊的个体认为保持社交距离更加困难,这反过来又降低了他们的遵守程度(即中介效应)。相比之下,自我控制能力强的个体更遵守指南,而不会认为这些指南更难或更容易遵守;然而,自我控制调节了难度对遵守的影响。我们的研究结果立即与改善 COVID-19 应对中社交距离指南的效果有关。