Department of Psychology, Harvard University.
Perceptive Automata, Inc., Palo Alto, California.
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2020 Sep;15(5):1284-1288. doi: 10.1177/1745691620922201. Epub 2020 Jul 31.
The alarm has been raised on so-called driverless dilemmas, in which autonomous vehicles will need to make high-stakes ethical decisions on the road. We argue that these arguments are too contrived to be of practical use, are an inappropriate method for making decisions on issues of safety, and should not be used to inform engineering or policy.
所谓的无人驾驶困境已经引起了警报,自动驾驶车辆将需要在道路上做出高风险的道德决策。我们认为,这些论点过于牵强,没有实际用途,也不是解决安全问题的合适方法,不应用于为工程或政策提供信息。