Department of Audiology & Speech-Language Pathology, University of North Texas, Denton.
Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Delaware, Newark.
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2020 Aug 4;29(3):1162-1177. doi: 10.1044/2019_AJSLP-19-00143.
Purpose Taxonomic awareness is central to vocabulary development and assessment. While taxonomic development appears largely unaffected by environmental factors, the impact of divided language input on distinct levels of the taxonomic hierarchy is unclear. The influence of scoring method on tasks that target distinct levels of the taxonomic hierarchy is unexamined. Method Twenty-seven English-speaking monolingual children, 46 Mandarin-English bilingual children, and 33 Spanish-English bilingual children, ages 4-7 years, participated. We measured superordinate awareness with a category association task, coordinate awareness with a contrast association task, and vocabulary size with a picture-naming task. All bilinguals completed the tasks in both languages to generate single-language (English) scores and conceptual scores. Results Single-language scoring indicated that bilingual children named fewer pictures and produced fewer superordinate-level responses in English than monolinguals. All language groups demonstrated comparable coordinate awareness. Importantly, conceptual scoring removed the bilingual disadvantage in both naming and category association tasks and revealed a bilingual advantage in coordinate awareness. Finally, the Mandarin-English and Spanish-English bilingual children performed comparably in all analyses despite differences in heritage language features and sociocultural support for bilingual development. Conclusion Depending on task demand and scoring method, bilingual children exhibited slower, comparable, and faster development in taxonomic knowledge in comparison to monolingual controls. This study highlights the nuanced effect of bilingualism on different levels of the taxonomic hierarchy and the impact of scoring methods on measuring vocabulary depth. Supplemental Material https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.12315683.
目的 分类意识是词汇发展和评估的核心。虽然分类发展似乎基本不受环境因素的影响,但语言输入的分割对分类层次不同层次的影响尚不清楚。评分方法对针对分类层次不同层次的任务的影响尚未研究。方法 27 名讲英语的单语儿童、46 名普通话-英语双语儿童和 33 名西班牙语-英语双语儿童,年龄 4-7 岁,参与了研究。我们使用类别联想任务测量超类别意识,使用对比联想任务测量坐标意识,使用图片命名任务测量词汇量。所有双语儿童都用两种语言完成任务,以生成单语(英语)分数和概念分数。结果 单语评分表明,双语儿童用英语命名的图片较少,产生的超类别反应也比单语儿童少。所有语言组在坐标意识方面表现出相似的能力。重要的是,概念评分消除了双语儿童在命名和类别联想任务中的劣势,并显示出在坐标意识方面的双语优势。最后,尽管有语言背景特征和双语发展的社会文化支持方面的差异,普通话-英语和西班牙语-英语双语儿童在所有分析中表现相当。结论 依赖于任务需求和评分方法,与单语对照组相比,双语儿童在分类知识方面表现出较慢、相当和更快的发展。本研究强调了双语对分类层次不同层次的影响的细微差别,以及评分方法对衡量词汇深度的影响。补充材料 https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.12315683.