• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

我先来:三方互动中公平的神经表示。

Me first: Neural representations of fairness during three-party interactions.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, 5848 S. University Ave, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, 60637, United States.

Department of Psychology, 5848 S. University Ave, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, 60637, United States; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL, 60637, United States.

出版信息

Neuropsychologia. 2020 Oct;147:107576. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2020.107576. Epub 2020 Aug 3.

DOI:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2020.107576
PMID:32758554
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7554091/
Abstract

One hallmark of human morality is a deep sense of fairness. People are motivated by both self-interest and a concern for the welfare of others. However, it remains unclear whether these motivations rely on similar neural computations, and the extent to which such computations influence social decision-making when self-fairness and other-fairness motivations compete. In this study, two groups of participants engaged in the role of responder in a three-party Ultimatum Game while being scanned with functional MRI (N = 32) or while undergoing high-density electroencephalography (N = 40). In both studies, participants accepted more OtherFair offers when they themselves received fair offers. Though SelfFairness was reliably decoded from scalp voltages by 170 ms, and from hemodynamic responses in right insula and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, there was no overlap between neural representations of fairness for self and for other. Distinct neural computations and mechanisms seem to be involved when making decisions about fairness in three-party contexts, which are anchored in an egocentric, self-serving bias.

摘要

人类道德的一个显著特征是强烈的公平感。人们的动机既来自自身利益,也来自对他人福利的关注。然而,目前尚不清楚这些动机是否依赖于类似的神经计算,以及当自我公平和他人公平动机相互竞争时,这些计算在多大程度上影响社会决策。在这项研究中,两组参与者在三方最后通牒博弈中担任回应者的角色,同时接受功能磁共振成像(n=32)或高密度脑电图(n=40)扫描。在这两项研究中,当参与者自己收到公平的报价时,他们会接受更多的其他公平报价。尽管通过头皮电压在 170ms 时可可靠地解码出 SelfFairness,并且可以从右侧脑岛和背外侧前额叶皮层的血液动力学反应中解码出 SelfFairness,但自我和他人公平的神经表示之间没有重叠。在三方情境下做出公平决策时,似乎涉及到不同的神经计算和机制,这些决策以自我为中心、自私自利的偏见为基础。

相似文献

1
Me first: Neural representations of fairness during three-party interactions.我先来:三方互动中公平的神经表示。
Neuropsychologia. 2020 Oct;147:107576. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2020.107576. Epub 2020 Aug 3.
2
The neural signatures of egocentric bias in normative decision-making.规范性决策中自我中心偏差的神经特征。
Brain Imaging Behav. 2019 Jun;13(3):685-698. doi: 10.1007/s11682-018-9893-1.
3
Neural signatures of fairness-related normative decision making in the ultimatum game: a coordinate-based meta-analysis.最后通牒博弈中公平相关规范决策的神经特征:基于坐标的元分析
Hum Brain Mapp. 2015 Feb;36(2):591-602. doi: 10.1002/hbm.22649. Epub 2014 Oct 18.
4
Decoding fairness motivations from multivariate brain activity patterns.从多元脑活动模式中解码公平动机。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2019 Nov 1;14(11):1197-1207. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsz097.
5
Disentangling self- and fairness-related neural mechanisms involved in the ultimatum game: an fMRI study.在最后通牒博弈中分离与自我和公平相关的神经机制:一项 fMRI 研究。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2013 Apr;8(4):424-31. doi: 10.1093/scan/nss014. Epub 2012 Jan 28.
6
Neural responses to unfairness and fairness depend on self-contribution to the income.对不公平和公平的神经反应取决于对收入的自我贡献。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2014 Oct;9(10):1498-505. doi: 10.1093/scan/nst131. Epub 2013 Aug 14.
7
The neural basis of economic decision-making in the Ultimatum Game.最后通牒博弈中经济决策的神经基础。
Science. 2003 Jun 13;300(5626):1755-8. doi: 10.1126/science.1082976.
8
Whether others were treated equally affects neural responses to unfairness in the Ultimatum Game.他人是否受到平等对待会影响在最后通牒博弈中对不公平的神经反应。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2015 Mar;10(3):461-6. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsu071. Epub 2014 May 19.
9
Not on my team: Medial prefrontal cortex responses to ingroup fusion and unfair monetary divisions.不在我的团队中:内侧前额叶皮质对群体融合和不公平货币划分的反应。
Brain Behav. 2018 Aug;8(8):e01030. doi: 10.1002/brb3.1030. Epub 2018 Jun 22.
10
Anterior insula signals inequalities in a modified Ultimatum Game.在前额叶岛在改良最后通牒博弈中发出不平等信号。
Neuroscience. 2017 Apr 21;348:126-134. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2017.02.023. Epub 2017 Feb 20.

引用本文的文献

1
The Neurocomputational Mechanism Underlying Decision-Making on Unfairness to Self and Others.决策不公平对待自我和他人的神经计算机制。
Neurosci Bull. 2024 Oct;40(10):1471-1488. doi: 10.1007/s12264-024-01245-8. Epub 2024 Jun 20.

本文引用的文献

1
Neural correlations of the influence of self-relevance on moral decision-making involving a trade-off between harm and reward.自我相关性对涉及伤害与奖励权衡的道德决策的影响的神经关联。
Psychophysiology. 2020 Sep;57(9):e13590. doi: 10.1111/psyp.13590. Epub 2020 Apr 23.
2
That's not fair: Children's neural computations of fairness and their impact on resource allocation behaviors and judgments.这不公平:儿童对公平的神经计算及其对资源分配行为和判断的影响。
Dev Psychol. 2019 Nov;55(11):2299-2310. doi: 10.1037/dev0000813. Epub 2019 Aug 22.
3
The development of children's preferences for equality and equity across 13 individualistic and collectivist cultures.13 个个人主义和集体主义文化背景下儿童对平等和公平偏好的发展。
Dev Sci. 2019 Mar;22(2):e12729. doi: 10.1111/desc.12729. Epub 2018 Sep 12.
4
Neurobiological Mechanisms of Responding to Injustice.回应不公正行为的神经生物学机制。
J Neurosci. 2018 Mar 21;38(12):2944-2954. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1242-17.2018. Epub 2018 Feb 19.
5
Harm to self outweighs benefit to others in moral decision making.在道德决策中,对自己的伤害大于对他人的益处。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Jul 25;114(30):7963-7968. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1706693114. Epub 2017 Jul 10.
6
Processing of fair and unfair offers in the ultimatum game under social observation.社会观察下最后通牒博弈中公平与不公平提议的处理。
Sci Rep. 2017 Mar 9;7:44062. doi: 10.1038/srep44062.
7
Social Decision-Making and the Brain: A Comparative Perspective.社会决策与大脑:比较视角
Trends Cogn Sci. 2017 Apr;21(4):265-276. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2017.01.007. Epub 2017 Feb 15.
8
Developmental Differences in Infants' Fairness Expectations From 6 to 15 Months of Age.6 至 15 个月婴儿公平期望的发展差异。
Child Dev. 2017 Nov;88(6):1930-1951. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12674. Epub 2016 Nov 21.
9
The Emerging Social Neuroscience of Justice Motivation.正义动机的新兴社会神经科学。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2017 Jan;21(1):6-14. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2016.10.008. Epub 2016 Nov 16.
10
Infants Associate Praise and Admonishment with Fair and Unfair Individuals.婴儿将赞扬和告诫与公平和不公平的个体联系起来。
Infancy. 2016 Jul-Aug;21(4):478-504. doi: 10.1111/infa.12117. Epub 2015 Sep 30.