Lähteenmäki Hanna, Umeizudike Kehinde A, Heikkinen Anna Maria, Räisänen Ismo T, Rathnayake Nilminie, Johannsen Gunnar, Tervahartiala Taina, Nwhator Solomon O, Sorsa Timo
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Diseases, Head and Neck Center, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, PO Box 63 (Haartmaninkatu 8), FI-00014 Helsinki, Finland.
Department of Preventive Dentistry, Faculty of Dental Sciences, College of Medicine, University of Lagos, Lagos 100213, Nigeria.
Diagnostics (Basel). 2020 Aug 5;10(8):562. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics10080562.
This communication article addresses currently available rapid non-invasive methods to screen and detect periodontitis and dental peri-implantitis. In this regard, oral fluid biomarkers have been researched extensively but self-reported oral health (SROH)-questionnaires have also been developed. Both alternatives may offer a quick and easy way to screen and detect diseased patients. Active matrix metalloproteinase (aMMP-8) is one of the most validated biomarkers for screening and detecting periodontal breakdown related to periodontitis and peri-implantitis and monitoring their treatment effects revealing successful, less- and non-successful treatment results. Currently available aMMP-8 lateral-flow technologies allow this kind of analysis, as demonstrated here, to be conducted quantitatively online and real-time as point-of-care/chairside testing in dental and even medical care settings. In this study, an aMMP-8 peri-implant sulcular fluid point-of-care-test diagnosed peri-implantitis and healthy implants far more accurately than bleeding-on-probing or the other biomarkers, such as polymorphonuclear (PMN)/neutrophil elastase, myeloperoxidase and MMP-9. Although, SROH-questionnaires allow screening in similar settings but they lack the information about the current disease activity of periodontitis and peri-implantitis, which is of essential value in periodontal diagnostics and treatment monitoring. Thus, both methods can be considered as adjunct methods for periodontitis and peri-implant diagnostics, but the value of oral fluid biomarkers analysis does not seem to be substitutable.
这篇通讯文章介绍了目前可用于筛查和检测牙周炎及种植体周围炎的快速非侵入性方法。在这方面,口腔液生物标志物已得到广泛研究,但自我报告的口腔健康(SROH)问卷也已开发出来。这两种方法都可能提供一种快速简便的方式来筛查和检测患病患者。活性基质金属蛋白酶(aMMP - 8)是用于筛查和检测与牙周炎及种植体周围炎相关的牙周组织破坏以及监测其治疗效果的最有效的生物标志物之一,能揭示成功、不太成功和不成功的治疗结果。目前可用的aMMP - 8侧向流动技术使得这种分析能够像本文所展示的那样,在牙科甚至医疗环境中作为即时护理/椅旁检测进行定量在线实时分析。在本研究中,一种aMMP - 8种植体周围龈沟液即时检测法诊断种植体周围炎和健康种植体的准确性远远高于探诊出血或其他生物标志物,如多形核白细胞(PMN)/中性粒细胞弹性蛋白酶、髓过氧化物酶和MMP - 9。虽然SROH问卷能够在类似环境中进行筛查,但它们缺乏关于牙周炎和种植体周围炎当前疾病活动的信息,而这在牙周诊断和治疗监测中具有至关重要的价值。因此,这两种方法都可被视为牙周炎和种植体周围诊断的辅助方法,但口腔液生物标志物分析的价值似乎不可替代。