Department of Preventive Dentistry, Periodontology and Implant Biology, Dental School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Diseases, Head and Neck Center, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Clin Exp Dent Res. 2024 Jun;10(3):e883. doi: 10.1002/cre2.883.
The objective of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of testing for active matrix metalloproteinase-8 (aMMP-8) by a quantitative point-of-care (PoC), chairside lateral flow immunotest and azurocidin, in the peri-implant sulcular fluid (PISF), as biomarkers for the presence or absence of peri-implant diseases.
Current research indicates that proinflammatory cytokines and extracellular matrix-degrading enzymes may be of value to diagnose and predict peri-implant disease initiation and progression, but more data are needed.
Eighty patients with implants were recruited. PISF samples were collected and quantitatively analyzed for aMMP-8 (chairside) and azurocidin with ELISA. Radiographic assessments and clinical indices (probing depth, probing attachment level, bleeding on probing, and plaque) were recorded after sampling. Kruskal-Wallis test and pairwise post hoc Dunn-Bonferroni test were used to relate aMMP-8 levels and azurocidin levels to clinical parameters. The diagnostic ability of aMMP-8 (ng/mL) and azurocidin was analyzed by receiver operator curve analysis. Area under the curve (AUC) was calculated and the Spearman's rho, and the coefficient of determination (R) were used to calculate the correlations between aMMP-8, azurocidin, and periodontal parameters.
Statistically significant differences were observed for aMMP-8 levels but not for azurocidin between healthy implants, implants with mucositis, and those with peri-implantitis (13.65 ± 7.18, 32.33 ± 21.20, and 73.07 ± 43.93 ng/mL, respectively), (Kruskall-Wallis test p < .05). The aMMP-8 test with a threshold of 20 ng/mL has a sensitivity of 71.7% and a specificity of 77.8% to identify peri-implantitis and healthy implants, respectively. AUC was found to be 0.814, and the accuracy of the method reaches 73.8%. Above a cutoff value of 33.7 ng/mL of aMMP-8, the accuracy of the test to detect peri-implantitis reaches 77.5% in relation to 62.5% of BoP from the same site.
Taken collectively, present data indicate that the aMMP-8 PoC lateral flow immunotest can be a beneficial, adjunctive diagnostic quantitative tool for real-time screening for peri-implant diseases.
本研究旨在通过一种定量即时检测(POC)、床边侧向流动免疫检测和天青杀素检测,检测活性基质金属蛋白酶-8(aMMP-8)在种植体周围龈沟液(PISF)中的有效性,作为诊断种植体周围疾病存在或不存在的生物标志物。
目前的研究表明,促炎细胞因子和细胞外基质降解酶可能对诊断和预测种植体周围疾病的起始和进展有价值,但需要更多的数据。
招募了 80 名植入物患者。采集 PISF 样本,并用 ELISA 定量分析 aMMP-8(床边)和天青杀素。取样后进行放射学评估和临床指标(探诊深度、探诊附着水平、探诊出血和菌斑)记录。采用 Kruskal-Wallis 检验和两两事后 Dunn-Bonferroni 检验将 aMMP-8 水平和天青杀素水平与临床参数相关联。通过接收者操作特征曲线分析分析 aMMP-8(ng/mL)和天青杀素的诊断能力。计算曲线下面积(AUC),并用 Spearman's rho 和决定系数(R)计算 aMMP-8、天青杀素和牙周参数之间的相关性。
在健康种植体、黏膜炎种植体和种植体周围炎种植体之间,aMMP-8 水平存在统计学显著差异,但天青杀素水平无差异(分别为 13.65±7.18、32.33±21.20 和 73.07±43.93ng/mL)(Kruskal-Wallis 检验,p<0.05)。当 aMMP-8 检测阈值为 20ng/mL 时,对种植体周围炎和健康种植体的诊断具有 71.7%的敏感性和 77.8%的特异性。AUC 为 0.814,方法的准确性达到 73.8%。当 aMMP-8 的截断值大于 33.7ng/mL 时,该检测方法对同一部位探诊出血率为 62.5%时,对种植体周围炎的诊断准确率为 77.5%。
综上所述,目前的数据表明,aMMP-8 POC 侧向流动免疫检测可以作为一种有益的、辅助性的即时筛查种植体周围疾病的定量诊断工具。