Bakeer Ahmed H, Kamel Khaled M, Abdelgalil Ahmed S, Ghoneim Ayman A, Abouel Soud Ahmed H, Hassan Mohamed E
Department of Anesthesia and Pain Management, National Cancer Institute, Cairo, Egypt.
J Pain Res. 2020 Jul 14;13:1769-1775. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S252539. eCollection 2020.
Modified pectoral nerves (PECSII) and serratus blocks have been recently used for analgesia in breast surgery, but evidence comparing their analgesic benefits is limited. This prospective randomized, controlled study aims to examine the analgesic efficacy and safety profile of ultrasound-guided PECSII versus serratus blocks in patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy (MRM) for breast cancer.
One-hundred and eighty adult females scheduled for MRM were randomly allocated to three groups. PECS group patients received a PECSII block with 30mL of bupivacaine 0.25%, whereas SAPB group received a serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) using the same volume of bupivacaine 0.25% before induction of anesthesia. The control group received general anesthesia alone. Outcomes included 24 hours morphine consumption, intraoperative fentanyl requirements, visual analogue scale (VAS) scores for pain at rest and during movement, time to first rescue analgesia, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), and sedation scores.
Both PECSII and serratus blocks were associated with reduced postoperative morphine consumption compared to the control group (p<0.001). Both blocks were associated with reduced intraoperative fentanyl requirements, VAS scores, and PONV as compared with the control group. Also, they were associated with prolonged time to first rescue analgesia and better sedation scores in comparison with the control group. However, there were no differences between both blocks for all outcomes.
PECSII and serratus blocks provide similarly adequate analgesia following modified radical mastectomy.
NCT02946294.
改良胸神经(PECSII)阻滞和锯肌阻滞最近已用于乳腺癌手术的镇痛,但比较它们镇痛效果的证据有限。这项前瞻性随机对照研究旨在探讨超声引导下PECSII阻滞与锯肌阻滞在接受乳腺癌改良根治术(MRM)患者中的镇痛效果和安全性。
180例计划行MRM的成年女性被随机分为三组。PECS组患者在麻醉诱导前接受30mL 0.25%布比卡因的PECSII阻滞,而SAPB组接受相同体积0.25%布比卡因的前锯肌平面阻滞(SAPB)。对照组仅接受全身麻醉。观察指标包括24小时吗啡用量、术中芬太尼需求量、静息和活动时疼痛的视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分、首次补救镇痛时间、术后恶心呕吐(PONV)及镇静评分。
与对照组相比,PECSII阻滞和锯肌阻滞均与术后吗啡用量减少相关(p<0.001)。与对照组相比,两种阻滞均与术中芬太尼需求量减少、VAS评分降低及PONV减少相关。此外,与对照组相比,它们还与首次补救镇痛时间延长及更好的镇静评分相关。然而,两种阻滞在所有观察指标上均无差异。
PECSII阻滞和锯肌阻滞在乳腺癌改良根治术后提供的镇痛效果相似。
NCT02946294。