• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

制定癌症护理中亲属参与指南——基于共识过程的结果。

Developing a Next-of-Kin Involvement Guide in Cancer Care-Results From a Consensus Process.

机构信息

Author Affiliations: Stavanger University Hospital (Ms Bergerød and Drs Braut and Gilje); SHARE-Centre for Resilience in Healthcare, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger (Ms Bergerød and Dr Wiig); Stavanger Unversity Hospital, Department of Hematology and Oncology (Ms Bergerød and Dr Gilje); and Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway (Ms Fagerdal).

出版信息

Cancer Nurs. 2021;44(6):E447-E457. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0000000000000869.

DOI:10.1097/NCC.0000000000000869
PMID:32769375
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8560156/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In hospital cancer care, there is no set standard for next-of-kin involvement in improving the quality of care and patient safety. There is therefore a growing need for tools and methods that can guide this complex area.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to present the results from a consensus-based participatory process of designing a guide for next-of-kin involvement in hospital cancer care.

METHOD

A consensus process based on a modified Nominal group technique was applied with 20 stakeholder participants from 2 Norwegian university hospitals.

RESULT

The participants agreed on the 5 most important priorities for hospital cancer care services when involving next-of-kin. The results showed that next-of-kin stakeholders, when proactively involved, are important resources for the patient and healthcare professionals in terms of contribution to quality and safety in hospitals. Suggested means of involving next-of-kin were closer interaction with external support bodies, integration in clinical pathways, adjusted information, and training healthcare professionals.

CONCLUSION

In this study, we identified topics and elements to include in a next-of-kin involvement guide to support quality and safety in hospital cancer care. The study raises awareness of the complex area of next-of-kin involvement and contributes with theory development and knowledge translation in an involvement guide tailored for use by healthcare professionals and managers in everyday clinical practice.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Service providers can use the guide to formulate intentions and make decisions with suggestions and priorities or as a reflexive tool for organizational improvement.

摘要

背景

在医院癌症护理中,没有规定近亲参与提高护理质量和患者安全的标准。因此,越来越需要能够指导这一复杂领域的工具和方法。

目的

本研究旨在介绍基于共识的参与式设计医院癌症护理中近亲参与指南的过程的结果。

方法

采用 20 名来自挪威 2 所大学医院的利益相关者参与者的改良名义群体技术共识过程。

结果

参与者就涉及近亲时医院癌症护理服务的 5 个最重要的优先事项达成一致。结果表明,当积极参与时,近亲利益相关者是患者和医疗保健专业人员的重要资源,有助于提高医院的质量和安全性。建议的涉及近亲的方式包括与外部支持机构更密切的互动、纳入临床路径、调整信息和培训医疗保健专业人员。

结论

在这项研究中,我们确定了在支持医院癌症护理质量和安全的近亲参与指南中包含的主题和要素。该研究提高了对近亲参与这一复杂领域的认识,并为参与指南的理论发展和知识转化做出了贡献,该指南专为医疗保健专业人员和管理人员在日常临床实践中使用而设计。

实践意义

服务提供者可以使用该指南来制定意图并做出决策,提供建议和优先事项,或作为组织改进的反思工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd83/8560156/77716c7d45d9/cn-44-e447-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd83/8560156/289b54edcc04/cn-44-e447-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd83/8560156/358c0fe9da52/cn-44-e447-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd83/8560156/6b01e928e5c7/cn-44-e447-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd83/8560156/77716c7d45d9/cn-44-e447-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd83/8560156/289b54edcc04/cn-44-e447-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd83/8560156/358c0fe9da52/cn-44-e447-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd83/8560156/6b01e928e5c7/cn-44-e447-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd83/8560156/77716c7d45d9/cn-44-e447-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Developing a Next-of-Kin Involvement Guide in Cancer Care-Results From a Consensus Process.制定癌症护理中亲属参与指南——基于共识过程的结果。
Cancer Nurs. 2021;44(6):E447-E457. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0000000000000869.
2
Next-of-kin involvement in improving hospital cancer care quality and safety - a qualitative cross-case study as basis for theory development.近亲参与改善医院癌症护理质量与安全——一项作为理论发展基础的定性跨案例研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 May 3;18(1):324. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3141-7.
3
Developing Methods to Support Collaborative Learning and Co-creation of Resilient Healthcare-Tips for Success and Lessons Learned From a Norwegian Hospital Cancer Care Study.开发支持协作学习和共同创建弹性医疗保健的方法-从挪威医院癌症护理研究中获得的成功经验和教训。
J Patient Saf. 2022 Aug 1;18(5):396-403. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000958. Epub 2022 Jan 24.
4
Measuring next of kin satisfaction with hospital cancer care: Using a mixed-method approach as basis for improving quality and safety.测量亲属对医院癌症护理的满意度:采用混合方法作为提高质量和安全性的基础。
J Adv Nurs. 2020 May;76(5):1232-1246. doi: 10.1111/jan.14315. Epub 2020 Mar 2.
5
Resilience From a Stakeholder Perspective: The Role of Next of Kin in Cancer Care.从利益相关者的角度看韧性:癌症护理中近亲的作用。
J Patient Saf. 2020 Sep;16(3):e205-e210. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000532.
6
Designing and pilot testing of a leadership intervention to improve quality and safety in nursing homes and home care (the SAFE-LEAD intervention).设计并试点领导力干预措施,以提高养老院和家庭护理的质量和安全性(SAFE-LEAD 干预)。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jun 17;9(6):e027790. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027790.
7
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
8
Needs-led research: a way of employing user involvement when devising research questions on the trust model in community home-based health care services in Norway.需求导向型研究:在挪威社区居家医疗服务信任模式研究问题设计中运用用户参与的一种方式。
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Jun 22;7(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00291-0.
9
Health professionals' perspectives of next of kin in the context of reablement.健康专业人员对再适应背景下的近亲的看法。
Disabil Rehabil. 2019 Aug;41(16):1882-1889. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2018.1450452. Epub 2018 Mar 15.
10
Unspoken expectations and situational participation: a qualitative study exploring the instantiation of next of kin involvement within the trust model.心照不宣的期望和情境参与:一项探索在信托模式下近亲参与实例化的定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Jul 30;24(1):866. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11338-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Design approaches for developing quality checklists in healthcare organizations: A scoping review.医疗保健组织中制定质量检查表的设计方法:一项范围综述
PLOS Digit Health. 2025 Sep 16;4(9):e0001015. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0001015. eCollection 2025 Sep.
2
Design Approaches for Developing Quality Checklists in Healthcare Organizations: A Scoping Review.医疗机构中制定质量检查表的设计方法:一项范围综述
medRxiv. 2024 Sep 28:2024.09.27.24314468. doi: 10.1101/2024.09.27.24314468.
3
Adaptation of an eHealth Intervention: iSupport for Carers of People with Rare Dementias.

本文引用的文献

1
Measuring next of kin satisfaction with hospital cancer care: Using a mixed-method approach as basis for improving quality and safety.测量亲属对医院癌症护理的满意度:采用混合方法作为提高质量和安全性的基础。
J Adv Nurs. 2020 May;76(5):1232-1246. doi: 10.1111/jan.14315. Epub 2020 Mar 2.
2
Reflexive Spaces: Leveraging Resilience Into Healthcare Regulation and Management.反思性空间:将恢复力应用于医疗保健监管与管理
J Patient Saf. 2021 Dec 1;17(8):e1681-e1684. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000658.
3
Development of a communication and health literacy curriculum: Optimizing the informal cancer caregiver role.
一项电子健康干预措施的改编:iSupport 用于照顾患有罕见痴呆症的人。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Dec 28;21(1):47. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21010047.
4
Stakeholder perspectives on the preferred service ecosystem for senior citizens living at home: a qualitative interview study.利益相关者对居家老年人首选服务生态系统的观点:一项定性访谈研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2023 Sep 19;23(1):576. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-04303-4.
5
Patient and public involvement in cancer research: A scoping review.患者和公众参与癌症研究:范围综述。
Cancer Med. 2023 Jul;12(14):15530-15543. doi: 10.1002/cam4.6200. Epub 2023 Jun 16.
发展沟通和健康素养课程:优化非正式癌症照护者角色。
Psychooncology. 2020 Apr;29(4):766-774. doi: 10.1002/pon.5341. Epub 2020 Feb 13.
4
From bystander to enlisted carer - A qualitative study of the experiences of caregivers of patients attending follow-up after curative treatment for cancers in the pancreas, duodenum and bile duct.从旁观者到应征护理者——一项关于胰腺癌、十二指肠癌和胆管癌患者在接受根治性治疗后接受随访期间护理者经历的定性研究。
Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2020 Feb;44:101717. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2019.101717. Epub 2019 Dec 23.
5
Family Caregiver Strain and Burden: A Systematic Review of Evidence-Based Interventions When Caring for Patients With Cancer.家庭照顾者的压力和负担:照顾癌症患者的循证干预措施的系统评价。
Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2020 Feb 1;24(1):31-50. doi: 10.1188/20.CJON.31-50.
6
Co-afflicted but invisible: A qualitative study of perceptions among informal caregivers in cancer care.共同患病却不被看见:癌症照护中非正式照护者认知的定性研究。
J Health Psychol. 2021 Sep;26(11):1850-1859. doi: 10.1177/1359105319890407. Epub 2019 Nov 28.
7
Next-of-Kin Involvement in Regulatory Investigations of Adverse Events That Caused Patient Death: A Process Evaluation (Part II: The Inspectors' Perspective).患者死亡相关不良事件监管调查中近亲属参与:过程评估(第二部分:检查官视角)。
J Patient Saf. 2021 Dec 1;17(8):e1707-e1712. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000634.
8
Next of Kin Involvement in Regulatory Investigations of Adverse Events That Caused Patient Death: A Process Evaluation (Part I - The Next of Kin's Perspective).近亲参与导致患者死亡的不良事件监管调查:过程评估(第一部分 - 近亲视角)。
J Patient Saf. 2021 Dec 1;17(8):e1713-e1718. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000630.
9
Clarity out of chaos: Use of theory in implementation research.从混沌中理清头绪:在实施研究中运用理论。
Psychiatry Res. 2020 Jan;283:112461. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2019.06.036. Epub 2019 Jun 23.
10
Designing and pilot testing of a leadership intervention to improve quality and safety in nursing homes and home care (the SAFE-LEAD intervention).设计并试点领导力干预措施,以提高养老院和家庭护理的质量和安全性(SAFE-LEAD 干预)。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jun 17;9(6):e027790. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027790.