He Ying, Xu Rui, Wang Wei, Zhang Jie, Hu Xiaoyu
Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu city, Sichuan province.
Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing city, China.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Aug 7;99(32):e21502. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000021502.
Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a functional gastrointestinal disease, with a high global incidence, which seriously influences the quality of life and work efficiency of patients. Extensive research showed that IBS is related to changes in the intestinal microenvironment. The novel treatment strategy targeting the gut microbiota is being actively implemented. Probiotics, antibiotics, prebiotics, fecal microbiota transplantation, and Chinese Herbal Medicine have been proven to be effective in the treatment of IBS, and all have an impact on the intestinal flora of patients. However, these 5 treatments have their own pros and cons and have not been systematically evaluated and compared. Therefore, this study will indirectly compare the safety and effectiveness of these 5 methods in the treatment of IBS through network meta-analysis.
The following databases including Embase, Pubmed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform and ClinicalTrials.gov will be retrieved from inception to June 2020 without language restrictions. Literature selection, data extraction, and bias analysis will be done by 2 researchers. The primary outcome is global symptoms improvement. The secondary outcomes will include individual IBS symptom scores, emotional response, and adverse events. The conventional pair-wise meta-analysis will be performed using Stata V.14.0 and be pooled using a random-effects model. We will use WinBUGS V.1.4.3 (Cambridge, United Kingdom) with a Bayesian hierarchical random-effects model to conduct the network meta-analysis.
This study will provide systematic reviews and indirect network comparison results about treatments of IBS.
This study will systematically evaluate and compare 5 intestinal flora-related therapies for IBS and to provide an evidence-based medical decision-making basis for clinicians.
INPLASY202050047.
肠易激综合征(IBS)是一种功能性胃肠疾病,全球发病率高,严重影响患者的生活质量和工作效率。广泛研究表明,IBS与肠道微环境变化有关。针对肠道微生物群的新型治疗策略正在积极实施。益生菌、抗生素、益生元、粪便微生物群移植和中药已被证明在治疗IBS方面有效,且均对患者的肠道菌群有影响。然而,这5种治疗方法各有优缺点,尚未进行系统评价和比较。因此,本研究将通过网状Meta分析间接比较这5种方法治疗IBS的安全性和有效性。
检索Embase、Pubmed、Cochrane对照试验中央注册库、中国生物医学文献数据库、世界卫生组织国际临床试验注册平台和ClinicalTrials.gov等数据库,检索时间从建库至2020年6月,无语言限制。由2名研究人员进行文献筛选、数据提取和偏倚分析。主要结局是整体症状改善。次要结局将包括IBS个体症状评分、情绪反应和不良事件。使用Stata V.14.0进行传统的成对Meta分析,并采用随机效应模型进行汇总。我们将使用WinBUGS V.1.4.3(英国剑桥)和贝叶斯分层随机效应模型进行网状Meta分析。
本研究将提供关于IBS治疗的系统评价和间接网状比较结果。
本研究将系统评价和比较5种与肠道菌群相关的IBS治疗方法,为临床医生提供循证医学决策依据。
INPLASY202050047。