Koonrungsesomboon Nut, Teekachunhatean Supanimit, Chansakaow Sunee, Hanprasertpong Nutthiya
Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand.
Musculoskeletal Science and Translational Research Center, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand.
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2020 Jul 25;2020:5782178. doi: 10.1155/2020/5782178. eCollection 2020.
Topical nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are widely prescribed for the treatment of symptomatic osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee. However, searching for alternatives such as locally available medicinal herbs to manage OA knee pain remains of clinical value. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of two yellow oil formulations in patients with OA of the knee.
This prospective, randomized, single-blind, active-controlled, noninferiority study enrolled 102 patients with OA of the knee. Eligible patients were randomly assigned to apply either yellow oil formulation 3 (YOF3), yellow oil formulation 4 (YOF4), or indomethacin solution (INDO) topically four times daily for four weeks. Outcomes were assessed on a biweekly basis. The primary efficacy outcome measure was a 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS) of pain, while secondary endpoints included knee function, physical performance assessments, and safety parameters. Modified intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses were applied. Assessment of noninferiority was done with a prespecified margin of 10 mm for VAS pain.
Of 102 patients enrolled, 86 completed the study: 29/34 in the YOF3 group, 25/34 in the YOF4 group, and 32/34 in the INDO group. The absolute reduction in VAS pain at the final evaluation was -25.06 ± 13.91, -18.50 ± 16.06, and -23.38 ± 10.05 mm in the YOF3, YOF4, and INDO groups, respectively (=0.169). Only YOF3 was found to be noninferior to INDO. Other efficacy outcomes were significantly improved in all three groups. All the interventions were well tolerated; no skin rash was observed in any of the three groups.
YOF3 was shown to be noninferior to INDO in relieving knee pain and should be considered an alternative for the treatment of symptomatic OA of the knee. Further research into the mechanism of action of YOF3 and its long-term efficacy and safety is required.
局部用非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)被广泛用于治疗膝关节症状性骨关节炎(OA)。然而,寻找如当地可得的草药等替代方法来管理膝骨关节炎疼痛仍具有临床价值。本研究的目的是评估两种黄油制剂对膝骨关节炎患者的疗效和安全性。
这项前瞻性、随机、单盲、活性对照、非劣效性研究纳入了102例膝骨关节炎患者。符合条件的患者被随机分配,每天4次局部应用黄油制剂3(YOF3)、黄油制剂4(YOF4)或吲哚美辛溶液(INDO),持续4周。每两周评估一次结果。主要疗效指标是100毫米视觉模拟疼痛量表(VAS),次要终点包括膝关节功能、身体性能评估和安全参数。采用改良意向性分析和符合方案分析。对VAS疼痛的非劣效性评估采用预先设定的10毫米界值。
在纳入的102例患者中,86例完成了研究:YOF3组29/34例,YOF4组25/34例,INDO组32/34例。在最终评估时,YOF3组、YOF4组和INDO组VAS疼痛的绝对降低值分别为-25.06±13.91、-18.50±16.06和-23.38±10.05毫米(=0.169)。仅发现YOF3不劣于INDO。所有三组的其他疗效指标均有显著改善。所有干预措施耐受性良好;三组均未观察到皮疹。
YOF3在缓解膝关节疼痛方面不劣于INDO,应被视为治疗膝关节症状性OA的替代药物。需要进一步研究YOF3的作用机制及其长期疗效和安全性。