Elban Felia, Hahnel Elisabeth, Blume-Peytavi Ulrike, Kottner Jan
Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Clinical Research Center for Hair and Skin Science, Berlin, Germany.
Ghent University, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Skin Integrity Research Group (SKINT), University Centre for Nursing and Midwifery, Ghent, Belgium.
J Tissue Viability. 2020 Nov;29(4):269-276. doi: 10.1016/j.jtv.2020.06.007. Epub 2020 Jul 29.
The non-invasive skin barrier measurements transepidermal water loss, stratum corneum hydration and the skin surface pH are widely used in clinical skin research. Relative and absolute measurement errors of these measurements are unknown in geriatric care settings.
Transepidermal water loss, stratum corneum hydration, skin surface pH and temperature were measured on the volar forearm and lower leg twice by trained raters within a cross-sectional study in ten nursing homes. Intrarater reliability was calculated using the ICC (1,1). Intrarater agreement was analyzed using Bland Altman Plots with limits of agreement.
Two hundred twenty-three residents were included and mean age was 84.2 years. The highest ICC was found for transepidermal water loss and skin surface temperature of the leg with 0.95 (95% CI 0.93 to 0.96). The ICC of the stratum corneum was 0.91 (95% CI 0.88 to 0.93) for both investigated skin areas. The measurement of the pH at the lower leg had the lowest ICC with 0.73 (95% CI 0.66 to 0.78). Highest limits of agreement of approximately 8 a.u. were calculated for stratum corneum hydration and lowest limits of agreement of approximately 1 °C were calculated for skin surface pH.
Relative measurement errors of transepidermal water loss and stratum corneum hydration were very low indicating that single measurements provide reliable estimates in this population and setting. However, the absolute measurement errors were high for both of these parameters. To increase reliability of skin surface pH we recommend at least two repeated measurements.
经表皮水分流失、角质层水合作用和皮肤表面pH值等非侵入性皮肤屏障测量方法在临床皮肤研究中被广泛应用。在老年护理环境中,这些测量方法的相对和绝对测量误差尚不清楚。
在一项对十家养老院进行的横断面研究中,由经过培训的评估人员对10名养老院老人的掌侧前臂和小腿进行两次经表皮水分流失、角质层水合作用、皮肤表面pH值和温度的测量。使用组内相关系数(ICC,1,1)计算评估人员内部的可靠性。使用带有一致性界限的布兰德-奥特曼图分析评估人员内部的一致性。
共纳入223名居民,平均年龄为84.2岁。腿部经表皮水分流失和皮肤表面温度的组内相关系数最高,为0.95(95%置信区间0.93至0.96)。两个研究皮肤区域的角质层组内相关系数均为0.91(95%置信区间0.88至0.93)。小腿pH值测量的组内相关系数最低,为0.73(95%置信区间0.66至0.78)。角质层水合作用的一致性界限最高约为8个任意单位,皮肤表面pH值的一致性界限最低约为1℃。
经表皮水分流失和角质层水合作用的相对测量误差非常低,表明单次测量在该人群和环境中能提供可靠的估计值。然而,这两个参数的绝对测量误差都很高。为提高皮肤表面pH值测量的可靠性,我们建议至少进行两次重复测量。