Payne Helen, Lawrie Denise, Nieuwoudt Martin, Cotton Mark Fredric, Gibb Diana M, Babiker Abdel, Glencross Debbie, Klein Nigel
UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, United Kingdom.
National Health Laboratory Service, Faculty of Health Science, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Front Pediatr. 2020 Jul 23;8:406. doi: 10.3389/fped.2020.00406. eCollection 2020.
Typically, African healthcare providers use immunological reference intervals adopted from Europe and the United States (US). This may be inappropriate in a setting with many differences including exposure to different environmental stimuli and pathogens. We compared immunological reference intervals for children from Europe and the US with South African children to explore whether healthy children living in settings with high rates of infectious diseases have different baseline immunological parameters. Blood was taken from 381 HIV-uninfected children aged between 2 weeks and 13 years of age from a Child Wellness Clinic in an informal settlement in Cape Town to establish local hematological and lymphocyte reference intervals for South African children. Flow-cytometry quantified percentage and absolute counts of the B-cells, NK-cells, and T-cells including activated, naïve, and memory subsets. These parameters were compared to three separate studies of healthy children in Europe and the US. Increased activated T-cells, and natural killer cells were seen in the younger age-groups. The main finding across all age-groups was that the ratio of naïve/memory CD4 and CD8 T-cells reached a 1:1 ratio around the first decade of life in healthy South African children, far earlier than in resource-rich countries, where it occurs around the fourth decade of life. This is the largest data set to date describing healthy children from an African environment. These data have been used to create local reference intervals for South African children. The dramatic decline in the naïve/memory ratio of both CD4 and CD8 T-cells alongside increased activation markers may indicate that South African children are exposed to a wider range of environmental pathogens in early life than in resource-rich countries. These marked differences illustrate that reference intervals should be relevant to the population they serve. The implications for the developing pediatric immune system requires further investigation.
通常,非洲的医疗服务提供者采用源自欧洲和美国的免疫参考区间。在存在诸多差异(包括接触不同环境刺激和病原体)的情况下,这可能并不合适。我们将欧洲、美国儿童与南非儿童的免疫参考区间进行比较,以探究生活在传染病高发环境中的健康儿童是否具有不同的基线免疫参数。从开普敦一个非正式定居点的儿童健康诊所,采集了381名年龄在2周龄至13岁之间且未感染艾滋病毒的儿童的血液,以建立南非儿童的当地血液学和淋巴细胞参考区间。流式细胞术对B细胞、NK细胞和T细胞(包括活化、幼稚和记忆亚群)的百分比和绝对计数进行了量化。这些参数与欧洲和美国针对健康儿童的三项独立研究进行了比较。在较年轻的年龄组中,活化T细胞和自然杀伤细胞有所增加。所有年龄组的主要发现是,健康南非儿童在生命的第一个十年左右,幼稚/记忆CD4和CD8 T细胞的比例达到1:1,远早于资源丰富国家,后者在生命的第四个十年左右才出现这种情况。这是迄今为止描述非洲环境中健康儿童的最大数据集。这些数据已被用于创建南非儿童的当地参考区间。CD4和CD8 T细胞的幼稚/记忆比例急剧下降以及活化标志物增加,可能表明南非儿童在生命早期比资源丰富国家的儿童接触到更广泛的环境病原体。这些显著差异表明参考区间应与所服务的人群相关。对发育中的儿科免疫系统的影响需要进一步研究。