Department of Radiology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, 1441 Eastlake Ave, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA.
Department of Pathology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Eur Radiol. 2021 Feb;31(2):1011-1021. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-07158-0. Epub 2020 Aug 15.
Using a radiomics framework to quantitatively analyze tumor shape and texture features in three dimensions, we tested its ability to objectively and robustly distinguish between benign and malignant renal masses. We assessed the relative contributions of shape and texture metrics separately and together in the prediction model.
Computed tomography (CT) images of 735 patients with 539 malignant and 196 benign masses were segmented in this retrospective study. Thirty-three shape and 760 texture metrics were calculated per tumor. Tumor classification models using shape, texture, and both metrics were built using random forest and AdaBoost with tenfold cross-validation. Sensitivity analyses on five sub-cohorts with respect to the acquisition phase were conducted. Additional sensitivity analyses after multiple imputation were also conducted. Model performance was assessed using AUC.
Random forest classifier showed shape metrics featuring within the top 10% performing metrics regardless of phase, attaining the highest variable importance in the corticomedullary phase. Convex hull perimeter ratio is a consistently high-performing shape feature. Shape metrics alone achieved an AUC ranging 0.64-0.68 across multiple classifiers, compared with 0.67-0.75 and 0.68-0.75 achieved by texture-only and combined models, respectively.
Shape metrics alone attain high prediction performance and high variable importance in the combined model, while being independent of the acquisition phase (unlike texture). Shape analysis therefore should not be overlooked in its potential to distinguish benign from malignant tumors, and future radiomics platforms powered by machine learning should harness both shape and texture metrics.
• Current radiomics research is heavily weighted towards texture analysis, but quantitative shape metrics should not be ignored in their potential to distinguish benign from malignant renal tumors. • Shape metrics alone can attain high prediction performance and demonstrate high variable importance in the combined shape and texture radiomics model. • Any future radiomics platform powered by machine learning should harness both shape and texture metrics, especially since tumor shape (unlike texture) is independent of the acquisition phase and more robust from the imaging variations.
利用放射组学框架对肿瘤的三维形状和纹理特征进行定量分析,以验证其是否能客观而稳健地区分良恶性肾肿瘤。我们评估了形状和纹理特征分别及联合预测模型中的相对贡献。
本回顾性研究对 735 名患者的 539 个恶性和 196 个良性肿块的 CT 图像进行了分割。每个肿瘤计算了 33 个形状和 760 个纹理特征。使用随机森林和 AdaBoost 分类器在十折交叉验证下构建基于形状、纹理和两者的肿瘤分类模型。针对采集阶段进行了 5 个子队列的敏感性分析,并进行了多次插补后的额外敏感性分析。使用 AUC 评估模型性能。
随机森林分类器显示,无论采集阶段如何,形状特征均在前 10%表现最佳的特征之列,在皮质髓质期的重要性最高。凸壳周长比是一个始终表现良好的形状特征。仅形状特征在多个分类器中获得的 AUC 值在 0.64-0.68 之间,而仅纹理和联合模型的 AUC 值分别为 0.67-0.75 和 0.68-0.75。
仅形状特征即可实现高预测性能和在联合模型中的高重要变量,而且与纹理特征不同,其不依赖于采集阶段。因此,在区分良恶性肿瘤方面,形状分析不应因其潜在能力而被忽视,未来基于机器学习的放射组学平台应利用形状和纹理特征。
• 当前的放射组学研究主要集中在纹理分析上,但在区分良恶性肾肿瘤方面,定量形状特征不应被忽视。• 仅形状特征即可在联合形状和纹理放射组学模型中实现高预测性能和高重要变量。• 任何未来基于机器学习的放射组学平台都应利用形状和纹理特征,尤其是由于肿瘤形状(与纹理不同)不依赖于采集阶段且更能抵抗成像变化,因此更具稳健性。