• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

共享照护对癌症幸存者的有效性——一项系统评价

The Effectiveness of Shared Care in Cancer Survivors-A Systematic Review.

作者信息

Zhao Yan, Brettle Alison, Qiu Ling

机构信息

Department of Urology, Minimally Invasive Surgery Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510230, CN.

School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Salford, Salford, Greater Manchester, M5 4WT, UK.

出版信息

Int J Integr Care. 2018 Oct 12;18(4):2. doi: 10.5334/ijic.3954.

DOI:10.5334/ijic.3954
PMID:30483035
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6199565/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether the shared care model during the follow-up of cancer survivors is effective in terms of patient-reported outcomes, clinical outcomes, and continuity of care.

METHODS

Using systematic review methods, studies were searched from six electronic databases-MEDLINE (n = 474), British Nursing Index (n = 320), CINAHL (n = 437), Cochrane Library (n = 370), HMIC (n = 77), and Social Care Online (n = 210). The review considered all health-related outcomes that evaluated the effectiveness of shared care for cancer survivors.

RESULTS

Eight randomised controlled trials and three descriptive papers were identified. The results showed the likelihood of similar effectiveness between shared care and usual care in terms of quality of life, mental health outcomes, unmet needs, and clinical outcomes in cancer survivorship. The reviewed studies indicated that shared care overall is highly acceptable to cancer survivors and primary care practitioners, and shared care might be cheaper than usual care.

CONCLUSIONS

The results from this review suggest that the patient satisfaction of shared care is higher than usual care, and the effectiveness of shared care is similar to usual care in cancer survivorship. Interventions that formally involve primary care and improve the communication between primary care and hospital care could support the PCPs in the follow-up.

摘要

目的

确定癌症幸存者随访期间的共享护理模式在患者报告结局、临床结局及护理连续性方面是否有效。

方法

采用系统评价方法,从六个电子数据库进行检索——医学索引数据库(n = 474)、英国护理索引数据库(n = 320)、护理学与健康领域数据库(n = 437)、考克兰图书馆(n = 370)、英国健康与社会保健管理数据库(n = 77)以及社会护理在线数据库(n = 210)。该评价纳入了所有评估癌症幸存者共享护理有效性的健康相关结局。

结果

共识别出八项随机对照试验和三篇描述性论文。结果显示,在癌症幸存者的生活质量、心理健康结局、未满足需求及临床结局方面,共享护理与常规护理的有效性可能相似。经审查的研究表明,总体而言,共享护理受到癌症幸存者和初级保健从业者的高度认可,且共享护理可能比常规护理成本更低。

结论

本评价结果表明,在癌症幸存者护理中,共享护理的患者满意度高于常规护理,且共享护理的有效性与常规护理相似。正式纳入初级保健并改善初级保健与医院护理之间沟通的干预措施,可在随访中为初级保健医生提供支持。

相似文献

1
The Effectiveness of Shared Care in Cancer Survivors-A Systematic Review.共享照护对癌症幸存者的有效性——一项系统评价
Int J Integr Care. 2018 Oct 12;18(4):2. doi: 10.5334/ijic.3954.
2
SCORE: Shared care of Colorectal cancer survivors: protocol for a randomised controlled trial.SCORE:结直肠癌幸存者的共享护理:一项随机对照试验方案
Trials. 2017 Oct 30;18(1):506. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2245-4.
3
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.
4
Interventions for promoting habitual exercise in people living with and beyond cancer.促进癌症患者及康复者进行习惯性锻炼的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Sep 24(9):CD010192. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010192.pub2.
5
Interventions to improve continuity of care in the follow-up of patients with cancer.改善癌症患者随访中医疗连续性的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jul 11;2012(7):CD007672. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007672.pub2.
6
Systematic reviews of the effectiveness of day care for people with severe mental disorders: (1) acute day hospital versus admission; (2) vocational rehabilitation; (3) day hospital versus outpatient care.针对重度精神障碍患者日间护理效果的系统评价:(1)急性日间医院与住院治疗对比;(2)职业康复;(3)日间医院与门诊护理对比。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(21):1-75. doi: 10.3310/hta5210.
7
Factors influencing the translation of shared cancer follow-up care into clinical practice: a systematic review.影响共享癌症随访护理转化为临床实践的因素:系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2022 Aug 29;12(8):e055460. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055460.
8
The Effectiveness of Information Technology-Supported Shared Care for Patients With Chronic Disease: A Systematic Review.信息技术支持的慢性病患者共享照护的有效性:一项系统综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Jun 22;19(6):e221. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7405.
9
Home-based multidimensional survivorship programmes for breast cancer survivors.针对乳腺癌幸存者的居家多维康复计划。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Aug 24;8(8):CD011152. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011152.pub2.
10
Is immediate imaging important in managing low back pain?在处理下腰痛时,立即进行影像学检查重要吗?
J Athl Train. 2011 Jan-Feb;46(1):99-102. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-46.1.99.

引用本文的文献

1
Use of the Survivors' Unmet Needs Survey (SUNS) Framework to Understand the Needs of Colorectal Cancer Survivors in Thailand: A Qualitative Descriptive Study.运用幸存者未满足需求调查(SUNS)框架了解泰国结直肠癌幸存者的需求:一项定性描述性研究
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Sep 1;13(17):2187. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13172187.
2
Continuity of Cancer Care: Female Participants' Report of Healthcare Experiences After Conclusion of Primary Treatment.癌症护理的连续性:女性参与者关于初次治疗结束后医疗经历的报告。
Curr Oncol. 2025 Jul 11;32(7):399. doi: 10.3390/curroncol32070399.
3
Oncologist and General Practitioner Perspectives of Shared Care for Colorectal Cancer Survivors: A Qualitative Study.

本文引用的文献

1
Shared Care of Childhood Cancer Survivors: A Telemedicine Feasibility Study.儿童癌症幸存者的共享护理:一项远程医疗可行性研究。
J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol. 2017 Dec;6(4):535-541. doi: 10.1089/jayao.2017.0013. Epub 2017 Jun 28.
2
Long-Term Follow-up Consultation After Childhood Cancer in the Rhône-Alpes Region of France: Feedback From Adult Survivors and Their General Practitioners.法国罗纳-阿尔卑斯地区儿童癌症患者的长期随访咨询:成年幸存者及其全科医生的反馈
J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol. 2017 Dec;6(4):524-534. doi: 10.1089/jayao.2017.0019. Epub 2017 May 25.
3
Shared care across the interface between primary and specialty care in management of long term conditions.
肿瘤学家和全科医生对结直肠癌幸存者共享护理的看法:一项定性研究。
Psychooncology. 2025 Jul;34(7):e70223. doi: 10.1002/pon.70223.
4
Implementation and effectiveness of a nurse-enabled, shared-care follow-up model for early breast cancer survivors (The IBIS-Survivorship Study): protocol for a stepped-wedge cluster randomised trial.一项针对早期乳腺癌幸存者的由护士主导的共享护理随访模式的实施与效果(IBIS 生存研究):一项阶梯式楔形整群随机试验方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Jun 19;15(6):e103341. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-103341.
5
Patient Experiences of Integrative health CarE [PEICE]: A cross-sectional study.综合健康护理患者体验[PEICE]:一项横断面研究。
Integr Med Res. 2025 Jun;14(2):101147. doi: 10.1016/j.imr.2025.101147. Epub 2025 Apr 23.
6
A Breast cAncer Survivorship Inter-Professional Community (BASIC) Shared Care Model to Promote Healthy Behaviors in Singapore: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.一种促进新加坡健康行为的乳腺癌幸存者跨专业社区(BASIC)共享护理模式:一项试点随机对照试验。
Int J Behav Med. 2025 Jun 3. doi: 10.1007/s12529-025-10372-z.
7
An exploration of nursing and Allied Health Professional (AHP)-led post-treatment surveillance and survivorship care for people with head and neck cancer-a scoping review.一项关于由护士及专职医疗专业人员主导的头颈癌患者治疗后监测与生存护理的探索——一项范围综述。
Support Care Cancer. 2025 Mar 13;33(4):277. doi: 10.1007/s00520-025-09272-5.
8
Models of care and associated targeted implementation strategies for cancer survivorship support in Europe: a scoping review protocol.欧洲癌症幸存者支持的照护模式及相关针对性实施策略:一项范围综述方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Feb 16;15(2):e085456. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085456.
9
Cancer Survivorship and the Significance of an Integrated Diachronic Life Course Perspective.癌症幸存者与综合历时性生命历程视角的意义
Sociol Health Illn. 2025 Feb;47(2):e70012. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.70012.
10
What it looks like to 'mind the gaps' in a Midwest survivorship clinic for childhood cancer survivors.在中西部儿童癌症幸存者生存诊所“关注差距”是怎样的情形。
Health Care Transit. 2023 Sep 29;1:100021. doi: 10.1016/j.hctj.2023.100021. eCollection 2023.
在长期病症管理中,初级保健与专科保健之间的衔接处进行共享护理。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 23;2(2):CD004910. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004910.pub3.
4
Integrating primary care providers in the care of cancer survivors: gaps in evidence and future opportunities.将初级保健提供者纳入癌症幸存者护理:证据差距与未来机遇
Lancet Oncol. 2017 Jan;18(1):e30-e38. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30570-8.
5
Using Survivorship Care Plans to Enhance Communication and Cancer Care Coordination: Results of a Pilot Study.使用癌症幸存者护理计划加强沟通与癌症护理协调:一项试点研究的结果
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2016 Sep 1;43(5):636-45. doi: 10.1188/16.ONF.636-645.
6
ProCare Trial: a phase II randomized controlled trial of shared care for follow-up of men with prostate cancer.ProCare试验:一项针对前列腺癌男性患者随访共享护理的II期随机对照试验。
BJU Int. 2017 Mar;119(3):381-389. doi: 10.1111/bju.13593. Epub 2016 Aug 29.
7
Shared care in prostate cancer: a three-year follow-up.
Scand J Urol. 2016 Oct;50(5):346-51. doi: 10.1080/21681805.2016.1206618. Epub 2016 Jul 15.
8
Educational interventions on evidence-based nursing in clinical practice: A systematic review with qualitative analysis.临床实践中基于证据的护理的教育干预措施:一项定性分析的系统评价
Nurse Educ Today. 2016 Aug;43:50-9. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2016.04.023. Epub 2016 May 5.
9
One-Year Experience Managing a Cancer Survivorship Clinic Using a Shared-Care Model for Gastric Cancer Survivors in Korea.韩国采用共享照护模式管理胃癌幸存者癌症康复诊所的一年经验
J Korean Med Sci. 2016 Jun;31(6):859-65. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2016.31.6.859. Epub 2016 Apr 15.
10
Substitution scenario in follow-up of chronic cancer patients in primary care: prevalence, disease duration and estimated extra consultation time.基层医疗中慢性癌症患者随访的替代方案:患病率、疾病持续时间及估计的额外会诊时间
Fam Pract. 2016 Feb;33(1):4-9. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmv098. Epub 2015 Dec 20.