• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种快速建立金黄色葡萄球菌和铜绿假单胞菌干燥表面生物膜的模型,用于体外消毒剂功效测试。

A rapid model for developing dry surface biofilms of Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa for in vitro disinfectant efficacy testing.

机构信息

Department of Food Science, Purdue University, 745 Agriculture Mall Drive, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA.

Diversey Inc., Charlotte, NC, 28273, USA.

出版信息

Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2020 Aug 17;9(1):134. doi: 10.1186/s13756-020-00792-9.

DOI:10.1186/s13756-020-00792-9
PMID:32807240
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7430009/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Bacterial biofilms persistent on dry environmental surfaces in healthcare facilities play an important role in the occurrence of healthcare associated infections (HAI). Compared to wet surface biofilms and planktonic bacteria, dry surface biofilms (DSB) are more tolerant to disinfection. However, there is no official method for developing DSB for in vitro disinfectant efficacy testing. The objectives of this study were to (i) develop an in vitro model of DSB of S. aureus and P. aeruginosa for disinfectant efficacy testing and (ii) investigate the effect of drying times and temperatures on DSB development. We hypothesized that a minimum six log density of DSB could be achieved on glass coupons by desiccating wet surface biofilms near room temperatures. We also hypothesized that a DSB produced by the model in this study will be encased in extracellular polymeric substances (EPS).

METHODS

S. aureus ATCC-6538 and P. aeruginosa ATCC-15442 wet surface biofilms were grown on glass coupons following EPA MLB SOP MB-19. A DSB model was developed by drying coupons in an incubator and viable bacteria were recovered following a modified version of EPA MLB SOP MB-20. Scanning electron microscopy was used to confirm the EPS presence on DSB.

RESULTS

Overall, a minimum of six mean log densities of DSB for disinfectant efficacy were recovered per coupon after drying at different temperatures and drying times. Regardless of strain, temperature and dry time, 86% of coupons with DSB were confirmed to have EPS.

CONCLUSION

A rapid model for developing DSB with characteristic EPS was developed for disinfectant efficacy testing against DSB.

摘要

背景

医疗机构干燥环境表面上持续存在的细菌生物膜在发生医院相关感染(HAI)方面起着重要作用。与湿表面生物膜和浮游细菌相比,干燥表面生物膜(DSB)对消毒更具耐受性。然而,目前还没有用于体外消毒剂功效测试的开发 DSB 的官方方法。本研究的目的是:(i)开发用于消毒剂功效测试的金黄色葡萄球菌和铜绿假单胞菌的 DSB 体外模型,(ii)研究干燥时间和温度对 DSB 形成的影响。我们假设通过在室温附近干燥湿表面生物膜,可以在玻璃小条上实现至少 6 个对数密度的 DSB。我们还假设本研究中模型产生的 DSB 将被细胞外聚合物质(EPS)包裹。

方法

按照 EPA MLB SOP MB-19,在玻璃小条上培养金黄色葡萄球菌 ATCC-6538 和铜绿假单胞菌 ATCC-15442 的湿表面生物膜。通过在培养箱中干燥小条来开发 DSB 模型,并按照 EPA MLB SOP MB-20 的修改版回收活细菌。使用扫描电子显微镜确认 DSB 上存在 EPS。

结果

总体而言,在不同温度和干燥时间下干燥后,每个小条至少回收了 6 个平均对数密度的 DSB 用于消毒剂功效测试。无论菌株如何,温度和干燥时间,86%的 DSB 小条被证实具有 EPS。

结论

开发了一种具有特征性 EPS 的 DSB 快速模型,用于针对 DSB 的消毒剂功效测试。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f01/7430009/00b2948a0c3a/13756_2020_792_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f01/7430009/e88084104e72/13756_2020_792_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f01/7430009/c418788d519b/13756_2020_792_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f01/7430009/39a590cc39f4/13756_2020_792_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f01/7430009/6a4dced74a8c/13756_2020_792_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f01/7430009/00b2948a0c3a/13756_2020_792_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f01/7430009/e88084104e72/13756_2020_792_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f01/7430009/c418788d519b/13756_2020_792_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f01/7430009/39a590cc39f4/13756_2020_792_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f01/7430009/6a4dced74a8c/13756_2020_792_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f01/7430009/00b2948a0c3a/13756_2020_792_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
A rapid model for developing dry surface biofilms of Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa for in vitro disinfectant efficacy testing.一种快速建立金黄色葡萄球菌和铜绿假单胞菌干燥表面生物膜的模型,用于体外消毒剂功效测试。
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2020 Aug 17;9(1):134. doi: 10.1186/s13756-020-00792-9.
2
Hydrogen peroxide, sodium dichloro-s-triazinetriones and quaternary alcohols significantly inactivate the dry-surface biofilms of and more than quaternary ammoniums.过氧化氢、二氯代三嗪三酮和季铵盐醇能显著失活 和 的干燥表面生物膜,效果强于季铵盐。
Microbiology (Reading). 2022 Mar;168(3). doi: 10.1099/mic.0.001140.
3
Hydrogen peroxide and sodium hypochlorite disinfectants are more effective against and biofilms than quaternary ammonium compounds.过氧化氢和次氯酸钠消毒剂比季铵盐化合物更能有效对抗 和 生物膜。
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2018 Dec 17;7:154. doi: 10.1186/s13756-018-0447-5. eCollection 2018.
4
Biofilm formation and disinfectant resistance of Salmonella sp. in mono- and dual-species with Pseudomonas aeruginosa.沙门氏菌在与铜绿假单胞菌形成单物种和双物种生物膜时的生物膜形成及消毒剂抗性
J Appl Microbiol. 2017 Sep;123(3):651-660. doi: 10.1111/jam.13521. Epub 2017 Jul 31.
5
Artificial dry surface biofilm models for testing the efficacy of cleaning and disinfection.用于测试清洁和消毒效果的人工干燥表面生物膜模型。
Lett Appl Microbiol. 2019 Apr;68(4):329-336. doi: 10.1111/lam.13143.
6
A new dry-surface biofilm model: An essential tool for efficacy testing of hospital surface decontamination procedures.一种新型干表面生物膜模型:医院表面去污程序功效测试的重要工具。
J Microbiol Methods. 2015 Oct;117:171-6. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2015.08.003. Epub 2015 Aug 7.
7
Bacteriophage Treatment before Chemical Disinfection Can Enhance Removal of Plastic-Surface-Associated Pseudomonas aeruginosa.细菌噬菌体处理在化学消毒前可增强对塑料表面相关铜绿假单胞菌的清除效果。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2021 Sep 28;87(20):e0098021. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00980-21. Epub 2021 Aug 4.
8
Effect of disinfectant formulation and organic soil on the efficacy of oxidizing disinfectants against biofilms.消毒剂配方和有机土壤对氧化型消毒剂抗生物膜效果的影响。
J Hosp Infect. 2019 Sep;103(1):e33-e41. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2018.10.019. Epub 2018 Oct 26.
9
Cross-contamination by disinfectant towelettes varies by product chemistry and strain.消毒湿巾的交叉污染因产品化学性质和菌株而异。
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2020 Aug 24;9(1):141. doi: 10.1186/s13756-020-00797-4.
10
Morphological bactericidal fast-acting effects of peracetic acid, a high-level disinfectant, against and biofilms in tubing.过氧乙酸作为一种高水平消毒剂对管道生物膜中 和 的形态杀菌快速作用。
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2017 Dec 1;6:122. doi: 10.1186/s13756-017-0281-1. eCollection 2017.

引用本文的文献

1
Biofilms, mobile genetic elements and the persistence of pathogens on environmental surfaces in healthcare and food processing environments.生物膜、移动遗传元件与医疗保健及食品加工环境中环境表面病原体的持续性
Front Microbiol. 2024 Jun 4;15:1405428. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1405428. eCollection 2024.
2
How biofilm changes our understanding of cleaning and disinfection.生物膜如何改变我们对清洁和消毒的理解。
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2023 Sep 7;12(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s13756-023-01290-4.
3
A new spray-based method for the in-vitro development of dry-surface biofilms.

本文引用的文献

1
Effect of microbial sanitizers for reducing biofilm formation of and on stainless steel by cultivation with UHT milk.微生物消毒剂通过与超高温灭菌乳培养来减少不锈钢表面和 生物膜形成的效果。 (原文中“和”后面缺少具体内容)
Food Sci Biotechnol. 2018 Aug 11;28(1):289-296. doi: 10.1007/s10068-018-0448-4. eCollection 2019 Feb.
2
Artificial dry surface biofilm models for testing the efficacy of cleaning and disinfection.用于测试清洁和消毒效果的人工干燥表面生物膜模型。
Lett Appl Microbiol. 2019 Apr;68(4):329-336. doi: 10.1111/lam.13143.
3
Effect of disinfectant formulation and organic soil on the efficacy of oxidizing disinfectants against biofilms.
一种新的喷雾基方法用于干表面生物膜的体外发育。
Microbiologyopen. 2023 Feb;12(1):e1330. doi: 10.1002/mbo3.1330.
4
Cold Atmospheric Pressure Plasma Device Exhibits Etching Effects on Bacterial Biofilms.冷大气压等离子体装置对细菌生物膜具有蚀刻作用。
IEEE Trans Radiat Plasma Med Sci. 2022 May;6(5):619-625. doi: 10.1109/trpms.2021.3133183. Epub 2021 Dec 7.
5
Raman Microscopic Analysis of Dry-Surface Biofilms on Clinically Relevant Materials.临床相关材料上干表面生物膜的拉曼显微镜分析
Microorganisms. 2022 Jul 7;10(7):1369. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10071369.
6
Dual species dry surface biofilms; Bacillus species impact on Staphylococcus aureus survival and surface disinfection.双种干燥表面生物膜;芽孢杆菌属对金黄色葡萄球菌存活和表面消毒的影响。
J Appl Microbiol. 2022 Aug;133(2):1130-1140. doi: 10.1111/jam.15619. Epub 2022 Jun 5.
7
Hydrogen peroxide, sodium dichloro-s-triazinetriones and quaternary alcohols significantly inactivate the dry-surface biofilms of and more than quaternary ammoniums.过氧化氢、二氯代三嗪三酮和季铵盐醇能显著失活 和 的干燥表面生物膜,效果强于季铵盐。
Microbiology (Reading). 2022 Mar;168(3). doi: 10.1099/mic.0.001140.
8
Bacteriophage Treatment before Chemical Disinfection Can Enhance Removal of Plastic-Surface-Associated Pseudomonas aeruginosa.细菌噬菌体处理在化学消毒前可增强对塑料表面相关铜绿假单胞菌的清除效果。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2021 Sep 28;87(20):e0098021. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00980-21. Epub 2021 Aug 4.
消毒剂配方和有机土壤对氧化型消毒剂抗生物膜效果的影响。
J Hosp Infect. 2019 Sep;103(1):e33-e41. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2018.10.019. Epub 2018 Oct 26.
4
Adaptive Metabolism in Staphylococci: Survival and Persistence in Environmental and Clinical Settings.葡萄球菌的适应性代谢:在环境和临床环境中的生存与持续存在
J Pathog. 2018 Sep 20;2018:1092632. doi: 10.1155/2018/1092632. eCollection 2018.
5
Beware biofilm! Dry biofilms containing bacterial pathogens on multiple healthcare surfaces; a multi-centre study.当心生物膜!多中心研究表明,在多个医疗保健表面存在含有细菌病原体的干燥生物膜。
J Hosp Infect. 2018 Nov;100(3):e47-e56. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2018.06.028. Epub 2018 Jul 17.
6
Transfer of dry surface biofilm in the healthcare environment: the role of healthcare workers' hands as vehicles.医疗环境中干燥表面生物膜的转移:医护人员的手作为载体的作用。
J Hosp Infect. 2018 Nov;100(3):e85-e90. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2018.06.021. Epub 2018 Jun 28.
7
Diagnostic Stewardship for Healthcare-Associated Infections: Opportunities and Challenges to Safely Reduce Test Use.医疗相关感染的诊断管理:安全减少检测使用的机遇与挑战
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2018 Feb;39(2):214-218. doi: 10.1017/ice.2017.278. Epub 2018 Jan 14.
8
The comparison of various disinfectants? efficacy on Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm layers.各种消毒剂对金黄色葡萄球菌和铜绿假单胞菌生物被膜层的效果比较。
Turk J Med Sci. 2017 Aug 23;47(4):1287-1294. doi: 10.3906/sag-1605-88.
9
Characterization of microbial community composition, antimicrobial resistance and biofilm on intensive care surfaces.重症监护病房表面微生物群落组成、抗菌耐药性和生物膜的特征。
J Infect Public Health. 2018 May-Jun;11(3):418-424. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2017.10.005. Epub 2017 Oct 31.
10
Extracellular Polymeric Matrix Production and Relaxation under Fluid Shear and Mechanical Pressure in Staphylococcus aureus Biofilms.金黄色葡萄球菌生物膜中在流体力和机械压力下的细胞外聚合基质的产生和弛豫。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2017 Dec 15;84(1). doi: 10.1128/AEM.01516-17. Print 2018 Jan 1.