Department of Occupational Health, Catholic University of Daegu, Gyeongsan, Korea.
Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Ulsan University Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Ulsan, Korea.
J Korean Med Sci. 2020 Aug 17;35(32):e248. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2020.35.e248.
Among workers who interact with angry clients, there is limited information about the characteristics of workers who are most vulnerable to mental health problems. Thus, we determined the association of multiple demographic, socioeconomic, and modifiable work-related psychosocial factors with the subjective well-being of workers who interact with angry clients.
This was a secondary analysis of data from the fifth Korean Working Conditions Survey, conducted in 2017. The study focused on workers who interacted with angry clients during 25% or more of their work time. Multiple logistic regression was used to determine odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals for the association of multiple factors with self-reported subjective well-being after adjustment for demographic, socioeconomic, and modifiable psychosocial factors.
Overall, 9.6% of men and 7.4% of women who interacted with angry clients reported poor subjective well-being. Poor well-being was significantly more likely to be reported by men who worked 40 hours or more per week (aOR, 3.97-5.37) and by men who were daily workers (aOR, 2.21). Poor subjective well-being had a significantly positive association with exposure to adverse social behaviors by clients (men: aOR, 1.54, women: aOR, 1.58), and significantly negative associations with unskilled manual work (women only: aOR, 0.30), job satisfaction (men: aOR, 0.70, women: aOR, 0.52), and good social climate (men: aOR, 0.70, women: aOR, 0.44).
Workers who interact with angry clients were widely distributed over non-manual labor and manual labor, but not limited to service and sales job. We identified modifiable factors that affect the subjective well-being of workers who interact with angry clients. We suggest that employers provide protection to prevent adverse social behaviors by clients, and also make an effort to establish a good social climate at the workplace.
在与愤怒客户打交道的员工中,有关最容易出现心理健康问题的员工特征的信息有限。因此,我们确定了多种人口统计学、社会经济和可改变的工作相关心理社会因素与与愤怒客户互动的员工主观幸福感之间的关联。
这是对 2017 年进行的第五次韩国工作条件调查数据的二次分析。该研究专注于在其工作时间的 25%或更多时间与愤怒客户互动的员工。在调整人口统计学、社会经济和可改变的心理社会因素后,使用多变量逻辑回归确定多个因素与自我报告的主观幸福感之间关联的比值比(OR)和 95%置信区间。
总体而言,9.6%的与愤怒客户互动的男性和 7.4%的女性报告主观幸福感较差。每周工作 40 小时或以上的男性(aOR,3.97-5.37)和日班工人(aOR,2.21)更有可能报告较差的幸福感。较差的主观幸福感与客户的不良社会行为(男性:aOR,1.54,女性:aOR,1.58)呈显著正相关,与非熟练体力劳动(仅女性:aOR,0.30)、工作满意度(男性:aOR,0.70,女性:aOR,0.52)和良好的社会氛围(男性:aOR,0.70,女性:aOR,0.44)呈显著负相关。
与愤怒客户互动的员工广泛分布于非体力劳动和体力劳动,但不仅限于服务和销售工作。我们确定了影响与愤怒客户互动的员工主观幸福感的可改变因素。我们建议雇主提供保护措施,以防止客户的不良社会行为,并努力在工作场所营造良好的社会氛围。