RWTH Aachen University, Institute for Biology I, Unit of Plant Molecular Cell Biology, Worringer Weg 1, 52056 Aachen, Germany.
The Sainsbury Laboratory, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, NR4 7UK, United Kingdom.
Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2020 Nov;33(11):1253-1264. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-06-20-0161-CR. Epub 2020 Oct 2.
This article is part of the Top 10 Unanswered Questions in MPMI invited review series.Nonhost resistance is typically considered the ability of a plant species to repel all attempts of a pathogen species to colonize it and reproduce on it. Based on this common definition, nonhost resistance is presumed to be very durable and, thus, of great interest for its potential use in agriculture. Despite considerable research efforts, the molecular basis of this type of plant immunity remains nebulous. We here stress the fact that "nonhost resistance" is a phenomenological rather than a mechanistic concept that comprises more facets than typically considered. We further argue that nonhost resistance essentially relies on the very same genes and pathways as other types of plant immunity, of which some may act as bottlenecks for particular pathogens on a given plant species or under certain conditions. Thus, in our view, the frequently used term "nonhost genes" is misleading and should be avoided. Depending on the plant-pathogen combination, nonhost resistance may involve the recognition of pathogen effectors by host immune sensor proteins, which might give rise to host shifts or host range expansions due to evolutionary-conditioned gains and losses in respective armories. Thus, the extent of nonhost resistance also defines pathogen host ranges. In some instances, immune-related genes can be transferred across plant species to boost defense, resulting in augmented disease resistance. We discuss future routes for deepening our understanding of nonhost resistance and argue that the confusing term "nonhost resistance" should be used more cautiously in the light of a holistic view of plant immunity.
这篇文章是 MPMI 十大未解问题特邀综述系列的一部分。非寄主抗性通常被认为是植物物种排斥病原体物种所有定植和繁殖企图的能力。基于这一常见定义,非寄主抗性被认为是非常持久的,因此,对于其在农业中的潜在应用具有很大的意义。尽管进行了大量的研究工作,但这种植物免疫的分子基础仍然不清楚。我们在这里强调的是,“非寄主抗性”是一个现象学的概念,而不是一个机械的概念,它包含的方面比通常考虑的要多。我们进一步认为,非寄主抗性本质上依赖于与其他类型植物免疫相同的基因和途径,其中一些途径可能在特定的植物物种或特定条件下成为特定病原体的瓶颈。因此,在我们看来,经常使用的术语“非寄主基因”是具有误导性的,应该避免使用。根据植物-病原体组合的不同,非寄主抗性可能涉及宿主免疫传感器蛋白对病原体效应子的识别,这可能由于各自武器库中进化条件下的得失而导致宿主转移或宿主范围扩大。因此,非寄主抗性的程度也定义了病原体的宿主范围。在某些情况下,与免疫相关的基因可以在植物物种之间转移,以增强防御,从而提高疾病抗性。我们讨论了加深对非寄主抗性理解的未来途径,并认为在对植物免疫进行整体观察的基础上,应更谨慎地使用混淆术语“非寄主抗性”。