Suppr超能文献

药物性肝损伤在早期肿瘤临床试验中的临床意义。

Clinical implications of drug-induced liver injury in early-phase oncology clinical trials.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.

Department of Pharmacy Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.

出版信息

Cancer. 2020 Nov 15;126(22):4967-4974. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33153. Epub 2020 Aug 18.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Data on drug-induced liver injury (DILI) and acute liver failure (ALF) in modern phase 1 oncology trials are limited, specifically with respect to the incidence and resolution of DILI and the safety of drug rechallenge.

METHODS

This study reviewed all patients who were recruited to phase 1 oncology trials between 2013 and 2017 at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. Clinicopathologic data were extracted to characterize DILI, and attribution was assessed on the basis of data prospectively generated during the studies. Logistic regression models were used to explore factors related to DILI and DILI recurrence after drug rechallenge.

RESULTS

Among 1670 cases recruited to 85 phase 1 trials, 81 (4.9%) developed DILI. The rate of DILI occurrence was similar for patients in immune-based trials and patients in targeted therapy trials (5.0% vs 4.9%), as was the median time to DILI (5.5 vs 6.5 weeks; P = .48). Two patients (0.12%) met the criteria of Hy's law, although none developed ALF. The DILI resolved in 96% of the patients. Pretreatment factors were not predictive for DILI development. Thirty-six of the 81 patients underwent a drug rechallenge, and 28% of these patients developed DILI recurrence. Peak alanine aminotransferase during the initial DILI was associated with DILI recurrence (odds ratio, 1.04; 95% confidence interval, 1.0-1.09; P = .035).

CONCLUSIONS

In modern phase 1 oncology trials, DILI is uncommon, may occur at any time, and often resolves with supportive measures. Rechallenging after DILI is feasible; however, the high rate of DILI recurrence suggests that clinicians should consider the severity of the DILI episode and treatment alternatives.

摘要

背景

关于现代 I 期肿瘤试验中的药物性肝损伤(DILI)和急性肝衰竭(ALF)的数据有限,特别是关于 DILI 的发生率和缓解情况以及药物再挑战的安全性。

方法

本研究回顾了 2013 年至 2017 年间在纪念斯隆凯特琳癌症中心招募的所有 I 期肿瘤试验患者。提取临床病理数据以描述 DILI,并根据研究期间前瞻性生成的数据评估归因。使用逻辑回归模型探讨与 DILI 和药物再挑战后 DILI 复发相关的因素。

结果

在 85 项 I 期试验中招募的 1670 例患者中,有 81 例(4.9%)发生了 DILI。免疫治疗试验和靶向治疗试验的患者 DILI 发生率相似(5.0% vs. 4.9%),DILI 发生的中位时间也相似(5.5 周 vs. 6.5 周;P=0.48)。尽管没有发生 ALF,但有 2 名患者(0.12%)符合 Hy's 法则标准。96%的患者 DILI 得到缓解。预处理因素与 DILI 发生无关。81 例患者中有 36 例接受了药物再挑战,其中 28%的患者发生了 DILI 复发。初次 DILI 时的丙氨酸氨基转移酶峰值与 DILI 复发相关(比值比,1.04;95%置信区间,1.0-1.09;P=0.035)。

结论

在现代 I 期肿瘤试验中,DILI 并不常见,可随时发生,且常通过支持性治疗得到缓解。DILI 后再挑战是可行的;然而,高复发率表明临床医生应考虑 DILI 发作的严重程度和治疗替代方案。

相似文献

8
Incidence and Etiology of Drug-Induced Liver Injury in Mainland China.中国内地药物性肝损伤的发生率及病因学。
Gastroenterology. 2019 Jun;156(8):2230-2241.e11. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.02.002. Epub 2019 Feb 8.

引用本文的文献

4
Management of drug-induced liver injury associated with anti-cancer therapy.与抗癌治疗相关的药物性肝损伤的管理。
Front Physiol. 2025 Mar 27;16:1541020. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2025.1541020. eCollection 2025.
8
Beyond the Checkpoint: Severe Axitinib-induced Liver Injury.超越检查点:阿昔替尼所致严重肝损伤
ACG Case Rep J. 2023 Nov 4;10(11):e01177. doi: 10.14309/crj.0000000000001177. eCollection 2023 Nov.

本文引用的文献

1
Drug-Induced Liver Injury - Types and Phenotypes.药物性肝损伤——类型与表型
N Engl J Med. 2019 Jul 18;381(3):264-273. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1816149.
3
Drug-induced liver injury in Oncology.肿瘤学中的药物性肝损伤
Ann Oncol. 2017 Aug 1;28(8):2013-2020. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx158.
4
Drug rechallenge following drug-induced liver injury.药物诱导肝损伤后的药物再挑战。
Hepatology. 2017 Aug;66(2):646-654. doi: 10.1002/hep.29152. Epub 2017 Jun 26.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验