School of Nursing, Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
School of Nursing, The second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Brain Behav. 2020 Oct;10(10):e01794. doi: 10.1002/brb3.1794. Epub 2020 Aug 18.
This study aimed to identify the influencing factors associated with long onset-to-door time and establish predictive models that could help to assess the probability of prehospital delay in populations with a high risk for stroke.
Patients who were diagnosed with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and hospitalized between 1 November 2018 and 31 July 2019 were interviewed, and their medical records were extracted for data analysis. Two machine learning algorithms (support vector machine and Bayesian network) were applied in this study, and their predictive performance was compared with that of the classical logistic regression models after using several variable selection methods. Timely admission (onset-to-door time < 3 hr) and prehospital delay (onset-to-door time ≥ 3 hr) were the outcome variables. We computed the area under curve (AUC) and the difference in the mean AUC values between the models.
A total of 450 patients with AIS were enrolled; 57 (12.7%) with timely admission and 393 (87.3%) patients with prehospital delay. All models, both those constructed by logistic regression and those by machine learning, performed well in predicting prehospital delay (range mean AUC: 0.800-0.846). The difference in the mean AUC values between the best performing machine learning model and the best performing logistic regression model was negligible (0.014; 95% CI: 0.013-0.015).
Machine learning algorithms were not inferior to logistic regression models for prediction of prehospital delay after stroke. All models provided good discrimination, thereby creating valuable diagnostic programs for prehospital delay prediction.
本研究旨在确定与长发病至门时间相关的影响因素,并建立预测模型,以帮助评估具有高卒中风险人群的院前延误概率。
对 2018 年 11 月 1 日至 2019 年 7 月 31 日期间诊断为急性缺血性卒中(AIS)并住院的患者进行访谈,并提取其病历进行数据分析。本研究应用了两种机器学习算法(支持向量机和贝叶斯网络),并在使用多种变量选择方法后,比较了它们与经典逻辑回归模型的预测性能。及时入院(发病至门时间<3 小时)和院前延误(发病至门时间≥3 小时)是结局变量。我们计算了曲线下面积(AUC)和模型间平均 AUC 值的差异。
共纳入 450 例 AIS 患者,其中 57 例(12.7%)及时入院,393 例(87.3%)患者存在院前延误。所有模型,包括逻辑回归和机器学习构建的模型,在预测院前延误方面表现良好(范围平均 AUC:0.800-0.846)。表现最佳的机器学习模型与表现最佳的逻辑回归模型之间平均 AUC 值的差异可以忽略不计(0.014;95%CI:0.013-0.015)。
机器学习算法在预测卒中后院前延误方面并不逊于逻辑回归模型。所有模型均具有良好的区分度,从而为院前延误预测创建了有价值的诊断程序。