Langley Ellis J G, Adams Gracie, Beardsworth Christine E, Dawson Deborah A, Laker Philippa R, van Horik Jayden O, Whiteside Mark A, Wilson Alastair J, Madden Joah R
Centre for Research in Animal Behaviour, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, Washington Singer Labs, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Department of Animal and Plant Sciences, Alfred Denny Building, University of Sheffield, Western Bank, Sheffield, UK.
Behav Ecol. 2020 May-Jun;31(3):798-806. doi: 10.1093/beheco/araa029. Epub 2020 Mar 29.
To understand the evolution of cognitive abilities, we need to understand both how selection acts upon them and their genetic (co)variance structure. Recent work suggests that there are fitness consequences for free-living individuals with particular cognitive abilities. However, our current understanding of the heritability of these abilities is restricted to domesticated species subjected to artificial selection. We investigated genetic variance for, and genetic correlations among four cognitive abilities: inhibitory control, visual and spatial discrimination, and spatial ability, measured on >450 pheasants, , over four generations. Pheasants were reared in captivity but bred from adults that lived in the wild and hence, were subject to selection on survival. Pheasant chicks are precocial and were reared without parents, enabling us to standardize environmental and parental care effects. We constructed a pedigree based on 15 microsatellite loci and implemented animal models to estimate heritability. We found moderate heritabilities for discrimination learning and inhibitory control (h = 0.17-0.23) but heritability for spatial ability was low (h = 0.09). Genetic correlations among-traits were largely positive but characterized by high uncertainty and were not statistically significant. Principle component analysis of the genetic correlation matrix estimate revealed a leading component that explained 69% of the variation, broadly in line with expectations under a general intelligence model of cognition. However, this pattern was not apparent in the phenotypic correlation structure which was more consistent with a modular view of animal cognition. Our findings highlight that the expression of cognitive traits is influenced by environmental factors which masks the underlying genetic structure.
为了理解认知能力的进化,我们需要了解选择如何作用于它们以及它们的遗传(协)方差结构。最近的研究表明,具有特定认知能力的自由生活个体存在适应性后果。然而,我们目前对这些能力遗传力的理解仅限于经过人工选择的驯化物种。我们调查了四代中450多只雉鸡的四种认知能力的遗传方差及其之间的遗传相关性:抑制控制、视觉和空间辨别以及空间能力。雉鸡在圈养环境中饲养,但由生活在野外的成年雉鸡繁殖而来,因此受到生存选择的影响。雉鸡雏鸟早熟,在没有父母的情况下饲养,这使我们能够标准化环境和父母照顾的影响。我们基于15个微卫星位点构建了一个谱系,并实施动物模型来估计遗传力。我们发现辨别学习和抑制控制的遗传力适中(h = 0.17 - 0.23),但空间能力的遗传力较低(h = 0.09)。性状之间的遗传相关性大多为正,但具有高度不确定性且无统计学意义。对遗传相关矩阵估计进行主成分分析发现,一个主要成分解释了69%的变异,这大致符合认知的一般智力模型下的预期。然而,这种模式在表型相关结构中并不明显,后者更符合动物认知的模块化观点。我们的研究结果强调,认知性状的表达受环境因素影响,这掩盖了潜在的遗传结构。