Department of Physics, Chemistry and Biology, IFM Biology, Linköping University, Linköping 581 83, Sweden
Department of Physics, Chemistry and Biology, IFM Biology, Linköping University, Linköping 581 83, Sweden.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2018 Sep 26;373(1756). doi: 10.1098/rstb.2017.0285.
Natural selection can act on between-individual variation in cognitive abilities, yet evolutionary responses depend on the presence of underlying genetic variation. It is, therefore, crucial to determine the relative extent of genetic versus environmental control of these among-individual differences in cognitive traits to understand their causes and evolutionary potential. We investigated heritability of associative learning performance and of a cognitive judgement bias (optimism), as well as their covariation, in a captive pedigree-bred population of red junglefowl (, > 300 chicks over 5 years). We analysed performance in discriminative and reversal learning (two facets of associative learning), and cognitive judgement bias, by conducting animal models to disentangle genetic from environmental contributions. We demonstrate moderate heritability for reversal learning, and weak to no heritability for optimism and discriminative learning, respectively. The two facets of associative learning were weakly negatively correlated, consistent with hypothesized trade-offs underpinning individual cognitive styles. Reversal, but not discriminative learning performance, was associated with judgement bias; less optimistic individuals reversed a previously learnt association faster. Together these results indicate that genetic and environmental contributions differ among traits. While modular models of cognitive abilities predict a lack of common genetic control for different cognitive traits, further investigation is required to fully ascertain the degree of covariation between a broader range of cognitive traits and the extent of any shared genetic control.This article is part of the theme issue 'Causes and consequences of individual differences in cognitive abilities'.
自然选择可以作用于认知能力的个体间差异,但进化反应取决于潜在遗传变异的存在。因此,确定这些认知特征个体间差异的遗传和环境控制的相对程度对于理解其原因和进化潜力至关重要。我们调查了关联学习表现和认知判断偏差(乐观)的遗传力,以及它们的协方差,在一个圈养的 pedigree-bred 红原鸡(,> 300 只小鸡,超过 5 年)种群中。我们通过进行动物模型来区分遗传和环境贡献,分析了辨别和反转学习(关联学习的两个方面)以及认知判断偏差的表现。我们证明了反转学习具有中等遗传力,而乐观和辨别学习分别具有较弱到没有遗传力。关联学习的两个方面呈弱负相关,与个体认知风格的假设权衡一致。只有反转学习表现与判断偏差有关;较不乐观的个体更快地反转以前学到的关联。这些结果表明,遗传和环境贡献在不同特征之间存在差异。虽然认知能力的模块化模型预测不同认知特征缺乏共同的遗传控制,但需要进一步调查,以充分确定更广泛的认知特征之间的协方差程度以及任何共同遗传控制的程度。本文是主题问题“认知能力个体差异的原因和后果”的一部分。