• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Reasons People Living with HIV Might Prefer Oral Daily Antiretroviral Therapy, Long-Acting Formulations, or Future HIV Remission Options.人们选择口服每日抗逆转录病毒疗法、长效制剂或未来的艾滋病缓解选择的原因。
AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2020 Dec;36(12):1054-1058. doi: 10.1089/AID.2020.0107. Epub 2020 Sep 14.
2
The Dose Response: Perceptions of People Living with HIV in the United States on Alternatives to Oral Daily Antiretroviral Therapy.剂量反应:美国艾滋病毒感染者对口服每日抗逆转录病毒疗法替代品的看法。
AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2020 Apr;36(4):324-348. doi: 10.1089/AID.2019.0175. Epub 2019 Dec 4.
3
Multi-level considerations for optimal implementation of long-acting injectable antiretroviral therapy to treat people living with HIV: perspectives of health care providers participating in phase 3 trials.长效注射用抗逆转录病毒疗法治疗艾滋病毒感染者的最佳实施的多层次考量:参与3期试验的医疗服务提供者的观点
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Mar 20;21(1):255. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06214-9.
4
"Cure" Versus "Clinical Remission": The Impact of a Medication Description on the Willingness of People Living with HIV to Take a Medication.“治愈”与“临床缓解”:药物描述对艾滋病毒感染者服药意愿的影响。
AIDS Behav. 2020 Jul;24(7):2054-2061. doi: 10.1007/s10461-019-02769-1.
5
U.S. patient preferences for long-acting HIV treatment: a discrete choice experiment.美国患者对长效 HIV 治疗的偏好:一项离散选择实验。
J Int AIDS Soc. 2023 Jul;26 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):e26099. doi: 10.1002/jia2.26099.
6
Assessment of satisfaction with antiretroviral drugs and the need for long-acting injectable medicines among people living with HIV in Japan and its associated factors: a prospective multicenter cross-sectional observational study.评估日本 HIV 感染者对抗逆转录病毒药物的满意度和对长效注射用药物的需求及其相关因素:一项前瞻性多中心横断面观察研究。
AIDS Res Ther. 2023 Aug 28;20(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s12981-023-00557-5.
7
Preferences of people living with HIV for injectable and oral antiretroviral treatment in the Netherlands: a discrete choice experiment.HIV 感染者对荷兰注射和口服抗逆转录病毒治疗的偏好:一项离散选择实验。
AIDS Care. 2024 Apr;36(4):536-545. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2023.2240067. Epub 2023 Aug 1.
8
If We Build It, Will They Come? Perceptions of HIV Cure-Related Research by People Living with HIV in Four U.S. Cities: A Qualitative Focus Group Study.如果我们构建了它,他们会来吗?美国四个城市的艾滋病毒感染者对艾滋病毒治愈相关研究的看法:一项定性焦点小组研究。
AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2018 Jan;34(1):56-66. doi: 10.1089/AID.2017.0178.
9
Dose-related and contextual aspects of suboptimal adherence to antiretroviral therapy among persons living with HIV in Western Europe.西欧 HIV 感染者中抗逆转录病毒治疗不依从与相关因素分析。
Eur J Public Health. 2021 Jul 13;31(3):567-575. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckaa229.
10
Poor adherence to antiretroviral therapy among adult people living with HIV initiated during the COVID-19 epidemic waves - observations at the University Teaching Hospital in Lusaka, Zambia.在 COVID-19 疫情期间启动的成人艾滋病毒感染者中,抗逆转录病毒治疗的依从性差 - 赞比亚卢萨卡大学教学医院的观察结果。
Front Public Health. 2023 Mar 13;11:1094214. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1094214. eCollection 2023.

引用本文的文献

1
Integrating socio-behavioral, ethics, community, and translational science considerations in HIV cure research.在HIV治愈研究中整合社会行为学、伦理学、社区及转化科学考量因素。
Curr Opin HIV AIDS. 2025 Jul 14. doi: 10.1097/COH.0000000000000955.
2
Mode of administration matters: Willingness of people with HIV to switch to future long-acting treatments, and health care professionals' intention to discuss these options.给药方式很重要:HIV感染者改用未来长效治疗方法的意愿,以及医护人员讨论这些选择的意向。
HIV Med. 2025 Sep;26(9):1395-1404. doi: 10.1111/hiv.70066. Epub 2025 Jul 2.
3
Patient-reported outcomes in clinical trials assessing the effectiveness of cabotegravir + rilpivirine long-acting injections as antiretroviral therapy: A systematic review.评估卡博特韦+利匹韦林长效注射剂作为抗逆转录病毒疗法有效性的临床试验中患者报告的结局:一项系统评价。
HIV Med. 2025 Sep;26(9):1343-1355. doi: 10.1111/hiv.70058. Epub 2025 Jul 2.
4
Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Orally Administered VH4011499, a New HIV-1 Capsid Inhibitor, in Adults Without HIV.新型HIV-1衣壳抑制剂VH4011499口服给药在未感染HIV的成人中的临床药代动力学和安全性
Infect Dis Ther. 2025 May;14(5):1011-1025. doi: 10.1007/s40121-025-01129-y. Epub 2025 Apr 2.
5
A Universal Approach to Educating Patients with HIV about Long-Acting Injectable Treatment for HIV.一种向感染艾滋病毒患者普及长效注射用艾滋病毒治疗知识的通用方法。
AIDS Behav. 2025 May;29(5):1704-1712. doi: 10.1007/s10461-024-04610-w. Epub 2025 Mar 3.
6
HIV Clinical Providers' Awareness, Attitudes, and Willingness to Support Patient Outreach Efforts for HIV Cure-Directed Research in Philadelphia, United States.美国费城艾滋病临床医护人员对支持患者参与艾滋病治愈导向研究的外展工作的认知、态度和意愿
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2024 Nov 19;11(12):ofae687. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofae687. eCollection 2024 Dec.
7
Patient and clinic staff perspectives on the implementation of a long-acting injectable antiretroviral therapy program in an urban safety-net health system.患者与诊所工作人员对在城市安全网卫生系统中实施长效注射抗逆转录病毒治疗项目的看法。
Implement Sci Commun. 2024 Aug 29;5(1):93. doi: 10.1186/s43058-024-00631-7.
8
Acceptability of Long-Acting Injectable Antiretroviral Therapy Among People with HIV Receiving Care at Three Ryan White Funded Clinics in the United States.在美国三个接受 Ryan White 基金资助的诊所接受治疗的 HIV 感染者对长效注射型抗逆转录病毒治疗的可接受性。
AIDS Behav. 2024 Jul;28(7):2226-2238. doi: 10.1007/s10461-024-04315-0. Epub 2024 Apr 10.
9
"This Is Actually a Really Unique Moment in Time": Navigating Long-Acting HIV Treatment and HIV Cure Research with Analytical Treatment Interruptions-A Qualitative Interview Study in the United States.“这实际上是一个非常独特的时刻”:在美国进行的一项定性访谈研究,探讨了分析性治疗中断情况下的长效 HIV 治疗和 HIV 治愈研究
AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2024 Aug;40(8):455-463. doi: 10.1089/AID.2023.0105. Epub 2024 Mar 27.
10
"What Is the Benefit?": Perceptions and Preferences for Long-Acting Injectable Antiretroviral Therapy Among People Living With HIV.“有何益处?”:HIV 感染者对长效注射型抗逆转录病毒疗法的认知和偏好。
AIDS Educ Prev. 2023 Dec;35(6):467-483. doi: 10.1521/aeap.2023.35.6.467.

本文引用的文献

1
Efficacy and Freedom: Patient Experiences with the Transition from Daily Oral to Long-Acting Injectable Antiretroviral Therapy to Treat HIV in the Context of Phase 3 Trials.疗效与自由:在 3 期临床试验背景下,每日口服药物向长效注射抗逆转录病毒疗法转换治疗 HIV 过程中患者的体验。
AIDS Behav. 2020 Dec;24(12):3473-3481. doi: 10.1007/s10461-020-02918-x.
2
Acceptability and preferences for long-acting antiretroviral formulations among people with HIV infection.接受度和偏好长效抗逆转录病毒制剂在艾滋病毒感染者中的应用。
AIDS Care. 2021 Jun;33(6):801-809. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2020.1764906. Epub 2020 May 14.
3
Perceptions of HIV Virologic Control Strategies Among Younger and Older Age Groups of People Living with HIV in the United States: A Cross-Sectional Survey.美国不同年龄段HIV感染者对HIV病毒学控制策略的认知:一项横断面调查
AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2020 Jul;36(7):606-615. doi: 10.1089/AID.2020.0023. Epub 2020 May 27.
4
Participant Perspectives in an HIV Cure-Related Trial Conducted Exclusively in Women in the United States: Results from AIDS Clinical Trials Group 5366.仅在美国女性中开展的 HIV 治愈相关试验中的参与者观点:美国艾滋病临床试验组 5366 的结果。
AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2020 Apr;36(4):268-282. doi: 10.1089/AID.2019.0284.
5
The significance and expectations of HIV cure research among people living with HIV in Australia.澳大利亚 HIV 感染者对 HIV 治愈研究的意义和期望。
PLoS One. 2020 Mar 4;15(3):e0229733. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229733. eCollection 2020.
6
Using Implementation Science to Better Integrate Novel Long-Acting Injectable Therapy Into Routine HIV Care.利用实施科学更好地将新型长效注射疗法融入常规 HIV 护理中。
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2019 Dec;82 Suppl 3:S286-S288. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000002218.
7
Long-acting injectable therapy: an emerging paradigm for the treatment of HIV infection.长效注射疗法:一种治疗HIV感染的新兴模式。
Curr Opin HIV AIDS. 2020 Jan;15(1):13-18. doi: 10.1097/COH.0000000000000606.
8
Applying the Behavioural and Social Sciences Research (BSSR) Functional Framework to HIV Cure Research.将行为和社会科学研究(BSSR)功能框架应用于 HIV 治愈研究。
J Int AIDS Soc. 2019 Oct;22(10):e25404. doi: 10.1002/jia2.25404.
9
A Conjoint Analysis of the Acceptability of Targeted Long-Acting Injectable Antiretroviral Therapy Among Persons Living with HIV in the U.S.美国 HIV 感染者对靶向长效注射型抗逆转录病毒疗法可接受性的联合分析
AIDS Behav. 2020 Apr;24(4):1226-1236. doi: 10.1007/s10461-019-02701-7.
10
The Dose Response: Perceptions of People Living with HIV in the United States on Alternatives to Oral Daily Antiretroviral Therapy.剂量反应:美国艾滋病毒感染者对口服每日抗逆转录病毒疗法替代品的看法。
AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2020 Apr;36(4):324-348. doi: 10.1089/AID.2019.0175. Epub 2019 Dec 4.

人们选择口服每日抗逆转录病毒疗法、长效制剂或未来的艾滋病缓解选择的原因。

Reasons People Living with HIV Might Prefer Oral Daily Antiretroviral Therapy, Long-Acting Formulations, or Future HIV Remission Options.

机构信息

UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.

Charles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science, Los Angeles, California, USA.

出版信息

AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2020 Dec;36(12):1054-1058. doi: 10.1089/AID.2020.0107. Epub 2020 Sep 14.

DOI:10.1089/AID.2020.0107
PMID:32829645
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7703233/
Abstract

A growing body of research is beginning to elucidate reasons people living with HIV (PLWHIV) might prefer oral daily antiretroviral treatment (ART) compared with emerging long-acting ART (LA-ART) or HIV remission strategies under investigation. Our objective is to provide qualitative insights into the reasons why PLWHIV might prefer one of these HIV control therapies over others. From May to August 2018, we implemented a semistructured cross-sectional survey of PLWHIV in the United States to better understand patient preferences around various HIV treatment and remission options. Using free text, respondents were asked to explain why they preferred one HIV control option over the other two. We analyzed responses to the open-ended survey questions on reasons for preferring oral daily ART versus LA-ART versus HIV remission strategies using conventional content analysis. The results showed that PLWHIV preferred oral daily ART because of its familiarity and known safety and efficacy profile, whereas those who preferred LA-ART would value the convenience it offers. Finally, HIV remission strategies would be preferred to avoid taking ART altogether. The qualitative results provide insights into reasons why PLWHIV in the United States might prefer oral daily ART versus novel therapies. More importantly, they provide information to better align HIV virological control strategies with end-user perspectives. To make informed choices around evolving HIV therapeutics, PLWHIV and HIV care providers would benefit from decision tools to better assess options and trade-offs. More research is needed on how best to effectively support PLWHIV and HIV care providers in shared decision-making.

摘要

越来越多的研究开始阐明为什么艾滋病毒感染者(PLWHIV)可能更喜欢口服每日抗逆转录病毒治疗(ART),而不是新兴的长效抗逆转录病毒治疗(LA-ART)或正在研究的 HIV 缓解策略。我们的目的是提供定性的见解,了解为什么 PLWHIV 可能更喜欢这些 HIV 控制疗法中的一种,而不是其他两种。

2018 年 5 月至 8 月,我们在美国对 PLWHIV 实施了半结构式横断面调查,以更好地了解患者对各种 HIV 治疗和缓解方案的偏好。使用自由文本,要求受访者解释他们为什么更喜欢一种 HIV 控制选择而不是其他两种。

我们使用常规内容分析方法,对口头每日 ART 与 LA-ART 相比和 HIV 缓解策略的偏好的开放性调查问题的回答进行了分析。结果表明,PLWHIV 更喜欢口服每日 ART,因为它熟悉且具有已知的安全性和疗效,而那些喜欢 LA-ART 的人则看重它提供的便利性。最后,HIV 缓解策略将被优先选择,以避免完全服用 ART。

定性结果提供了有关为什么美国 PLWHIV 可能更喜欢口服每日 ART 而不是新型疗法的见解。更重要的是,它们提供了信息,以便更好地将 HIV 病毒学控制策略与最终用户的观点保持一致。为了在不断发展的 HIV 治疗方法方面做出明智的选择,PLWHIV 和 HIV 护理提供者将受益于决策工具,以更好地评估选择和权衡。

需要进一步研究如何最好地有效支持 PLWHIV 和 HIV 护理提供者共同决策。