Ponticorvo Adrien, Rowland Rebecca, Baldado Melissa, Kennedy Gordon T, Hosking Anna-Marie, Burmeister David M, Christy Robert J, Bernal Nicole P, Durkin Anthony J
Beckman Laser Institute and Medical Clinic, University of California, Irvine, 1002 Health Sciences Road East, Irvine, CA 92617, United States.
UC Irvine Medical Center, Department of Surgery, 333 City Boulevard West, Suite 705, Orange, CA 92868, United States.
Burns Open. 2020 Apr;4(2):67-71. doi: 10.1016/j.burnso.2020.02.004. Epub 2020 Feb 19.
While visual assessment by a clinician is the standard of care for burn severity evaluations, new technologies at various stages of development are attempting to add objectivity to this practice by quantifying burn severity. Assessment accuracy generally improves after the burn injury has progressed, but early assessments that correctly identify superficial partial and deep partial burns have the potential to lead to more prompt treatments and shorter recovery times. To date, Spatial Frequency Domain Imaging (SFDI) has only been used in animal models of burns, but has shown the potential to categorize burns accurately at earlier time points. Here we examine the potential for SFDI to assess burn severity in clinical patients. We also utilize Laser Speckle Imaging (LSI), an FDA cleared non-invasive imaging technology that typically measures blood perfusion in order to evaluate burns in clinical patients. We present a case series of two patients, both with partial thickness burns of varying severity. Partial thickness burns are often difficult for clinicians to categorize based on visual appearance alone. SFDI and LSI were both performed on each patient at approximately 24 and 72 h after their respective burn incidents. Each technique was able to render spatially resolved information that enabled improved assessment accuracy for each burn. This represents the first publication of SFDI applied to clinical burn patients after being successfully utilized in animal models, and highlights the potential for SFDI as a feasible tool for the timely categorization of burn severity.
虽然临床医生的视觉评估是烧伤严重程度评估的护理标准,但处于不同发展阶段的新技术正试图通过量化烧伤严重程度,使这一做法更具客观性。烧伤损伤进展后,评估准确性通常会提高,但能正确识别浅Ⅱ度和深Ⅱ度烧伤的早期评估有可能带来更及时的治疗和更短的恢复时间。迄今为止,空间频域成像(SFDI)仅用于烧伤动物模型,但已显示出在更早时间点准确分类烧伤的潜力。在此,我们研究SFDI在临床患者中评估烧伤严重程度的潜力。我们还利用激光散斑成像(LSI),这是一种经美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)批准的非侵入性成像技术,通常用于测量血流灌注,以评估临床患者的烧伤情况。我们展示了一个包含两名患者的病例系列,两名患者均有不同严重程度的浅Ⅱ度烧伤。仅根据外观,临床医生往往很难对浅Ⅱ度烧伤进行分类。在每名患者烧伤事件发生后约24小时和72小时,分别对其进行了SFDI和LSI检查。每种技术都能够提供空间分辨信息,从而提高了对每次烧伤的评估准确性。这是SFDI在动物模型中成功应用后首次应用于临床烧伤患者的报告,并突出了SFDI作为及时分类烧伤严重程度的可行工具的潜力。