Afroz Zakia, Burak Gunay H, O'Brien William
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Carleton University, Canada.
Energy Build. 2020 Nov 1;226:110367. doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.110367. Epub 2020 Aug 7.
While the research community widely recognizes the importance of post-occupancy measurement of buildings to verify performance, requirements of green building certification schemes are highly varied. To assess the effectiveness of building certification schemes during the operation and maintenance stage of certified buildings, this paper critically reviews recent case studies that report on post-certification performance. The review of relevant case studies from the literature reveals some important findings in relation to the performance gap of certified buildings. Subsequently, major operation and maintenance-related building certification schemes are surveyed to reveal the underlying reasons behind this performance gap. Post-certification actions that require post-occupancy data collection and analysis are identified through this survey and compared to highlight their strengths and shortcomings and pinpoint the major discrepancies in data infrastructure and archiving practices that hinder certified buildings in performing according to their design intent. Lastly, suggestions are extracted which may shed light on the re-certification pathways.
虽然研究界广泛认识到建筑使用后评估对验证性能的重要性，但绿色建筑认证计划的要求却千差万别。为了评估建筑认证计划在已认证建筑运营和维护阶段的有效性，本文批判性地回顾了近期有关认证后性能的案例研究。对文献中相关案例研究的回顾揭示了与已认证建筑性能差距相关的一些重要发现。随后，对与运营和维护相关的主要建筑认证计划进行了调查，以揭示这种性能差距背后的潜在原因。通过此次调查确定了需要使用后数据收集和分析的认证后行动，并进行比较以突出其优缺点，找出数据基础设施和存档做法中的主要差异，这些差异阻碍了已认证建筑按照其设计意图运行。最后，提取了一些可能为重新认证途径提供思路的建议。
