Morley Louise, Roberts Paul, Ota Hiroshi
Centre for Higher Education and Equity Research (CHEER), University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton, East Sussex, UK.
Hitotsubashi University, Kunitachi-shi, Tokyo 186-8601 Japan.
High Educ (Dordr). 2021;82(4):765-781. doi: 10.1007/s10734-020-00593-4. Epub 2020 Aug 4.
Positive attributes stick to higher education internationalisation, and it is a policy paradigm with performative effects. Internationalisation draws on imagined virtuous flows of knowledge production and exchange, and is presented as an assemblage of detraditionalisation, expansiveness and epistemic and cultural opportunity for individuals, organisations and nation states. Policies target bodies, minds and affect, yet are presented as an unquestionable good in an imagined genderneutral, borderless, meritocratic and benign global knowledge economy. This paper explores the affective economy of internationalisation drawing upon interview data gathered in fifteen private, five national and eight public universities in Japan with thirty-four migrant academics and thirteen international doctoral researchers. We aim to contribute to internationalisation theory by exploring the sticky micropolitics of internationalisation in relation to affective assemblages, and how the gendered, racialised, linguistic and epistemic inequalities constituting academic mobility are frequently disqualified from discourse. Our discussion includes consideration of the Japanese policy context, the concept of affective assemblages, navigating gender regimes, precarity and linguistic imperialism. We conclude that the immaterial or affective labour that is required to unstick, install and maintain an internationalised academic identity and navigate the translations and antagonisms from everyday encounters with difference is substantially under-estimated.
积极属性与高等教育国际化紧密相连,它是一种具有实践效果的政策范式。国际化借助想象中知识生产与交流的良性流动,被呈现为一种去传统化、扩展性以及为个人、组织和民族国家提供认知与文化机遇的集合体。政策作用于身体、思想和情感,却在想象中的性别中立、无国界、精英主义且良性的全球知识经济中被视为无可置疑的善举。本文利用在日本15所私立大学、5所国立大学和8所公立大学收集的访谈数据,对34名移民学者和13名国际博士研究生进行研究,探讨国际化的情感经济。我们旨在通过探究国际化与情感集合体相关的粘性微观政治,以及构成学术流动的性别、种族、语言和认知不平等如何频繁地在话语中被排除,为国际化理论做出贡献。我们的讨论包括对日本政策背景、情感集合体概念、应对性别制度、不稳定状态和语言帝国主义的考量。我们得出结论,为摆脱、塑造并维持国际化的学术身份,以及应对日常与差异相遇时的转变和对抗所需的非物质或情感劳动,在很大程度上被低估了。