• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两例新型冠状病毒肺炎病例中不同标本类型用于核酸检测的临床意义

Clinical implications of different specimen types for nucleic acid testing in two cases of COVID-19.

作者信息

Fan Hengwei, Yu Xiaqing, Fu Xiaohui, Zhu Hengmei, Lv Zhongwei, Yi Wanwan, Zhang Qian

机构信息

Department of Hepatic Surgery, the Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Navy Medical University (Second Military Medical University), Shanghai, China.

Department of Infection medicine, the Guanggu District of Hubei Province Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Wuhan, Hubei, China.

出版信息

J Int Med Res. 2020 Aug;48(8):300060520949067. doi: 10.1177/0300060520949067.

DOI:10.1177/0300060520949067
PMID:32840148
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7447863/
Abstract

The novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) nucleic acid test is currently the gold standard for diagnosing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). This disease requires high-quality viral nucleic acid tests, and selecting the type of specimen from patients, who are at different disease stages, to use in the nucleic acid test is challenging. This article reports in detail the diagnosis and treatment process for two patients with confirmed COVID-19 and analyzes the results of the SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid tests that were used for different types of specimens (sputum from deep cough, nasopharyngeal swab, and feces). The nucleic acid testing results of sputum from deep cough showed the best performance for positive detection. Our findings provide a reference for selecting the most suitable specimen for the clinical diagnosis of COVID-19 and improving the positive detection rate.

摘要

新型严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)核酸检测目前是诊断2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的金标准。这种疾病需要高质量的病毒核酸检测,而从处于不同疾病阶段的患者中选择用于核酸检测的标本类型具有挑战性。本文详细报告了两名COVID-19确诊患者的诊断和治疗过程,并分析了针对不同类型标本(深咳痰液、鼻咽拭子和粪便)进行的SARS-CoV-2核酸检测结果。深咳痰液的核酸检测结果显示出最佳的阳性检测性能。我们的研究结果为选择最适合COVID-19临床诊断的标本以及提高阳性检测率提供了参考。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0594/7450462/b984c97638d0/10.1177_0300060520949067-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0594/7450462/544e7cd95a9d/10.1177_0300060520949067-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0594/7450462/444e37bb99a8/10.1177_0300060520949067-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0594/7450462/778bf12b3333/10.1177_0300060520949067-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0594/7450462/b984c97638d0/10.1177_0300060520949067-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0594/7450462/544e7cd95a9d/10.1177_0300060520949067-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0594/7450462/444e37bb99a8/10.1177_0300060520949067-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0594/7450462/778bf12b3333/10.1177_0300060520949067-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0594/7450462/b984c97638d0/10.1177_0300060520949067-fig4.jpg

相似文献

1
Clinical implications of different specimen types for nucleic acid testing in two cases of COVID-19.两例新型冠状病毒肺炎病例中不同标本类型用于核酸检测的临床意义
J Int Med Res. 2020 Aug;48(8):300060520949067. doi: 10.1177/0300060520949067.
2
Detection and analysis of nucleic acid in various biological samples of COVID-19 patients.检测和分析 COVID-19 患者各种生物样本中的核酸。
Travel Med Infect Dis. 2020 Sep-Oct;37:101673. doi: 10.1016/j.tmaid.2020.101673. Epub 2020 Apr 18.
3
Value of Viral Nucleic Acid in Sputum and Feces and Specific IgM/IgG in Serum for the Diagnosis of Coronavirus Disease 2019.痰和粪便中的病毒核酸与血清特异性 IgM/IgG 对 2019 年冠状病毒病的诊断价值。
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2020 Aug 6;10:445. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2020.00445. eCollection 2020.
4
Commercial Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Molecular Assays: Superior Analytical Sensitivity of cobas SARS-CoV-2 Relative to NxTAG CoV Extended Panel and ID NOW COVID-19 Test.商业用严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2(SARS-CoV-2)分子检测:与 NxTAG CoV 扩展面板和 ID NOW COVID-19 测试相比, cobas SARS-CoV-2 的分析灵敏度更高。
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2020 Nov 1;144(11):1303-1310. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2020-0283-SA.
5
Potential False-Negative Nucleic Acid Testing Results for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 from Thermal Inactivation of Samples with Low Viral Loads.低病毒载量样本热失活可导致严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2 的核酸检测结果出现潜在假阴性。
Clin Chem. 2020 Jun 1;66(6):794-801. doi: 10.1093/clinchem/hvaa091.
6
Comparison of throat swabs and sputum specimens for viral nucleic acid detection in 52 cases of novel coronavirus (SARS-Cov-2)-infected pneumonia (COVID-19).比较 52 例新型冠状病毒(SARS-CoV-2)感染性肺炎(COVID-19)患者的咽拭子和痰标本用于病毒核酸检测。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2020 Jun 25;58(7):1089-1094. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2020-0187.
7
Analysis of adjunctive serological detection to nucleic acid test for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection diagnosis.分析辅助血清学检测在严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2(SARS-CoV-2)感染诊断中的应用。
Int Immunopharmacol. 2020 Sep;86:106746. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2020.106746. Epub 2020 Jun 26.
8
Performance of Abbott ID Now COVID-19 Rapid Nucleic Acid Amplification Test Using Nasopharyngeal Swabs Transported in Viral Transport Media and Dry Nasal Swabs in a New York City Academic Institution.雅培 ID Now COVID-19 快速核酸扩增检测试剂使用鼻咽拭子和干鼻拭子在纽约市学术机构中运输的病毒运输介质的性能。
J Clin Microbiol. 2020 Jul 23;58(8). doi: 10.1128/JCM.01136-20.
9
Differences of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Shedding Duration in Sputum and Nasopharyngeal Swab Specimens Among Adult Inpatients With Coronavirus Disease 2019.新型冠状病毒肺炎成年住院患者痰液与鼻咽拭子标本中 2019 年冠状病毒脱落持续时间的差异。
Chest. 2020 Nov;158(5):1876-1884. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2020.06.015. Epub 2020 Jun 20.
10
Value of swab types and collection time on SARS-COV-2 detection using RT-PCR assay.拭子类型和采集时间对 RT-PCR 检测 SARS-COV-2 的影响。
J Virol Methods. 2020 Dec;286:113974. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2020.113974. Epub 2020 Sep 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Prospective Study of the Performance of Parent-Collected Nasal and Saliva Swab Samples, Compared with Nurse-Collected Swab Samples, for the Molecular Detection of Respiratory Microorganisms.前瞻性研究家长采集的鼻拭子和唾液拭子样本与护士采集的拭子样本在呼吸道微生物分子检测中的性能比较。
Microbiol Spectr. 2021 Dec 22;9(3):e0016421. doi: 10.1128/Spectrum.00164-21. Epub 2021 Nov 10.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of throat swabs and sputum specimens for viral nucleic acid detection in 52 cases of novel coronavirus (SARS-Cov-2)-infected pneumonia (COVID-19).比较 52 例新型冠状病毒(SARS-CoV-2)感染性肺炎(COVID-19)患者的咽拭子和痰标本用于病毒核酸检测。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2020 Jun 25;58(7):1089-1094. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2020-0187.
2
Laboratory Diagnosis of COVID-19: Current Issues and Challenges.新型冠状病毒肺炎的实验室诊断:当前的问题和挑战。
J Clin Microbiol. 2020 May 26;58(6). doi: 10.1128/JCM.00512-20.
3
Virological assessment of hospitalized patients with COVID-2019.
住院 COVID-19 患者的病毒学评估。
Nature. 2020 May;581(7809):465-469. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2196-x. Epub 2020 Apr 1.
4
Clinical Features and Chest CT Manifestations of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in a Single-Center Study in Shanghai, China.中国上海单中心研究的 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的临床特征和胸部 CT 表现。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2020 Jul;215(1):121-126. doi: 10.2214/AJR.20.22959. Epub 2020 Mar 14.
5
New coronavirus outbreak: Framing questions for pandemic prevention.新型冠状病毒爆发:为预防大流行提出问题。
Sci Transl Med. 2020 Mar 11;12(534). doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.abb1469.
6
Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Different Types of Clinical Specimens.SARS-CoV-2 在不同类型临床标本中的检测。
JAMA. 2020 May 12;323(18):1843-1844. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.3786.
7
SARS-CoV-2 is an appropriate name for the new coronavirus.严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2型是这种新型冠状病毒的恰当名称。
Lancet. 2020 Mar 21;395(10228):949-950. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30557-2. Epub 2020 Mar 6.
8
Clinical Characteristics of Imported Cases of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Jiangsu Province: A Multicenter Descriptive Study.江苏省输入性新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)病例的临床特征:一项多中心描述性研究。
Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Jul 28;71(15):706-712. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa199.
9
A new coronavirus associated with human respiratory disease in China.一种在中国与人类呼吸道疾病相关的新型冠状病毒。
Nature. 2020 Mar;579(7798):265-269. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2008-3. Epub 2020 Feb 3.