• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2002 年至 2017 年期间欧盟成年人久坐行为的变化。

Changes in sedentary behaviour in European Union adults between 2002 and 2017.

机构信息

Observatory of Healthy & Active Living of Spain Active Foundation, Centre for Sport Studies, King Juan Carlos University, Madrid, Spain.

GO fit LAB, Ingesport, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2020 Aug 26;20(1):1206. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09293-1.

DOI:10.1186/s12889-020-09293-1
PMID:32843022
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7448983/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Sedentary behaviour (SB) has been identified as an important mortality risk factor. Health organizations have recognised SB as a public health challenge with major health, social, and economic consequences. Researchers have alerted the need to develop specific strategies, to monitor, prevent, and reduce SB. However, there is no systematic analysis of the SB changes in European Union adults. We aimed to examine SB changes between 2002 and 2017 in the European Union (EU) adult population.

METHODS

SB prevalence (>4h30mins of sitting time/day) of 96,004 adults as a whole sample and country-by-country was analysed in 2002, 2005, 2013, and 2017 of the Sport and Physical Activity EU Special Eurobarometers' data. The SB question of a modified version of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire was considered. SB prevalence between countries and within years was analysed with a χ2 test, and SB between genders was analysed with the Z-Score test for two population proportions.

RESULTS

An association between the SB prevalence and the years was found (p <  0.001), with increases for the whole sample (2002: 49.3%, 48.5-50.0 95% confidence interval (CI); 2017: 54.5%, 53.9-55.0 95% CI) and men (2002: 51.2%, 50.0-52.4 95% CI; 2017: 55.8%, 55.0-56.7 95% CI) and women (2002: 47.6%, 46.6-48.7 95% CI; 2017: 53.4%, 52.6-54.1 95% CI) separately. The adjusted standardised residuals showed an increase in the observed prevalence versus the expected during 2013 and 2017 for the whole sample and women and during 2017 for men. For all years, differences were observed in the SB prevalence between countries for the whole sample, and men and women separately (p <  0.001). Besides, the SB prevalence was always higher in men versus women in the overall EU sample (p <  0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

SB prevalence increased between 2002 and 2017 for the EU as a whole and for both sexes separately. Additionally, differences in SB prevalence were observed for all years between EU countries in the whole sample and both sexes separately. Lastly, SB was consistently higher in men than women. These findings reveal a limited impact of current policies and interventions to tackle SB at the EU population level.

摘要

背景

久坐行为(SB)已被确定为一个重要的死亡风险因素。健康组织已经认识到 SB 是一个具有重大健康、社会和经济后果的公共卫生挑战。研究人员提醒需要制定具体策略来监测、预防和减少 SB。然而,目前还没有对欧盟成年人 SB 变化的系统分析。我们旨在研究 2002 年至 2017 年间欧盟成年人的 SB 变化。

方法

2002 年、2005 年、2013 年和 2017 年,对体育和身体活动欧盟特殊 Eurobarometer 数据中 96004 名成年人的整体样本和国家样本的 SB 患病率(>4 小时 30 分钟/天的坐姿时间)进行了分析。考虑了修改后的国际体力活动问卷的 SB 问题。使用 χ2 检验分析了各国之间和各年之间的 SB 患病率,使用两个人口比例的 Z 分数检验分析了男女之间的 SB 患病率。

结果

发现 SB 患病率与年份之间存在关联(p<0.001),整个样本(2002 年:49.3%,48.5-50.0%置信区间(CI);2017 年:54.5%,53.9-55.0%CI)和男性(2002 年:51.2%,50.0-52.4%CI;2017 年:55.8%,55.0-56.7%CI)和女性(2002 年:47.6%,46.6-48.7%CI;2017 年:53.4%,52.6-54.1%CI)的患病率均有所增加。调整后的标准化残差显示,2013 年和 2017 年期间,整个样本和女性的观察到的患病率相对于预期值有所增加,而 2017 年期间男性的患病率有所增加。对于所有年份,整个样本以及男性和女性之间的 SB 患病率在各国之间均存在差异(p<0.001)。此外,在整个欧盟样本中,男性的 SB 患病率始终高于女性(p<0.001)。

结论

2002 年至 2017 年间,整个欧盟以及男性和女性的 SB 患病率均有所上升。此外,在整个样本和男性和女性中,所有年份的欧盟国家之间的 SB 患病率均存在差异。最后,SB 在男性中始终高于女性。这些发现表明,目前在欧盟人口层面上解决 SB 的政策和干预措施的影响有限。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/03b1/7448983/56c5fbec1d4c/12889_2020_9293_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/03b1/7448983/56c5fbec1d4c/12889_2020_9293_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/03b1/7448983/56c5fbec1d4c/12889_2020_9293_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Changes in sedentary behaviour in European Union adults between 2002 and 2017.2002 年至 2017 年期间欧盟成年人久坐行为的变化。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Aug 26;20(1):1206. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09293-1.
2
No changes in adolescent's sedentary behaviour across Europe between 2002 and 2017.2002 年至 2017 年期间,欧洲青少年久坐行为没有变化。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Apr 23;21(1):784. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10860-3.
3
An inventory of national surveillance systems assessing physical activity, sedentary behaviour and sport participation of adults in the European Union.评估欧盟成年人身体活动、久坐行为和参与运动情况的国家监测系统目录。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Oct 7;21(1):1797. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11842-1.
4
The active living gender's gap challenge: 2013-2017 Eurobarometers physical inactivity data show constant higher prevalence in women with no progress towards global reduction goals.积极生活的性别差距挑战:2013-2017 年欧洲晴雨表身体活动不足数据显示,女性的患病率持续较高,而全球减少目标没有取得任何进展。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Dec 12;19(1):1677. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-8039-8.
5
A retrospective analysis of policy development on compliance with World Health Organization's physical activity recommendations between 2002 and 2005 in European Union adults: closing the gap between research and policy.2002 年至 2005 年欧盟成年人遵守世界卫生组织身体活动建议政策制定的回顾性分析:缩小研究与政策之间的差距。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Aug 31;18(1):1081. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5986-4.
6
Socio-demographic patterning of objectively measured physical activity and sedentary behaviours in eight Latin American countries: Findings from the ELANS study.八个拉丁美洲国家中客观测量的体力活动和久坐行为的社会人口统计学模式:来自 ELANS 研究的结果。
Eur J Sport Sci. 2020 Jun;20(5):670-681. doi: 10.1080/17461391.2019.1678671. Epub 2019 Oct 30.
7
Physical Inactivity Levels of European Adolescents in 2002, 2005, 2013, and 2017.2002 年、2005 年、2013 年和 2017 年欧洲青少年的身体活动水平。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 20;20(4):3758. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20043758.
8
Factors influencing sedentary behaviour: A system based analysis using Bayesian networks within DEDIPAC.影响久坐行为的因素:基于 DEDIPAC 的贝叶斯网络系统分析。
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 30;14(1):e0211546. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211546. eCollection 2019.
9
Status and contents of physical activity recommendations in European Union countries: a systematic comparative analysis.欧盟国家体力活动建议的现状和内容:系统比较分析。
BMJ Open. 2020 Feb 20;10(2):e034045. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034045.
10
National physical activity and sedentary behaviour policies in 76 countries: availability, comprehensiveness, implementation, and effectiveness.76 个国家的国家体力活动和久坐行为政策:可用性、全面性、实施情况和有效性。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2020 Sep 18;17(1):116. doi: 10.1186/s12966-020-01022-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Measuring the physical activity in the EU using a fuzzy hybrid synthetic index and an ordered probit model.运用模糊混合综合指数和有序概率模型衡量欧盟的体育活动情况。
Front Sports Act Living. 2025 Jul 31;7:1582658. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2025.1582658. eCollection 2025.
2
Correlates of sedentary behaviors among adults from eastern Poland.波兰东部成年人久坐行为的相关因素。
Front Public Health. 2025 Jul 22;13:1588908. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1588908. eCollection 2025.
3
Modulation Effect of Physical Activity on Sleep Quality and Mental Hyperactivity in Higher-Education Students.

本文引用的文献

1
A comparison of self-reported and device measured sedentary behaviour in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.比较成年人自我报告和设备测量的久坐行为:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2020 Mar 4;17(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s12966-020-00938-3.
2
Controversies in the Science of Sedentary Behaviour and Health: Insights, Perspectives and Future directions from the 2018 Queensland Sedentary Behaviour Think Tank.久坐行为与健康科学中的争议:2018 年昆士兰久坐行为智库的见解、观点和未来方向。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Nov 27;16(23):4762. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16234762.
3
Time trends between 2002 and 2017 in correlates of self-reported sitting time in European adults.
体育活动对大学生睡眠质量和精神多动的调节作用。
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 May 1;13(9):1040. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13091040.
4
Associations of Mentally Active Versus Passive Sedentary Behavior with Overweight/Obesity in Adults: Role of Patterns and Sex.成年人中积极与消极久坐行为与超重/肥胖的关联:模式和性别的作用。
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Feb 8;13(4):361. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13040361.
5
Editorial: Sedentary behaviour and cardiometabolic health.社论:久坐行为与心脏代谢健康
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Oct 16;11:1498410. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1498410. eCollection 2024.
6
Effects of a sedentary behaviour intervention in emergency dispatch centre phone operators: a study protocol for the SECODIS randomised controlled cross-over trial.久坐行为干预对紧急调度中心电话接线员的影响:SECODIS 随机对照交叉试验研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Oct 9;14(10):e080177. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080177.
7
How physical exercise with others and prioritizing positivity contribute to (work) wellbeing: a cross-sectional and diary multilevel study.与他人一起进行体育锻炼以及优先保持积极心态如何促进(工作)幸福感:一项横断面和日记式多层次研究。
Front Sports Act Living. 2024 Sep 6;6:1437974. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2024.1437974. eCollection 2024.
8
An Interdisciplinary Intervention Based on Prescription of Physical Activity, Diet, and Positive Mental Health to Promote Healthy Lifestyle in Patients with Obesity: A Randomized Control Trial.基于运动、饮食和积极心理健康处方的跨学科干预促进肥胖患者健康生活方式:一项随机对照试验。
Nutrients. 2024 Aug 20;16(16):2776. doi: 10.3390/nu16162776.
9
Prevalence and Factors Related to Physical Activity in Spanish Adults with Obesity and Overweight: Analysis of the European Health Surveys for the Years 2014 and 2020.西班牙肥胖和超重成年人的身体活动患病率及相关因素:2014年和2020年欧洲健康调查分析
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Jul 10;12(14):1382. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12141382.
10
Associations between domains of sedentary behavior, well-being, and quality of life - a cross-sectional study.静坐行为各维度与幸福感和生活质量的相关性研究——一项横断面研究。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jul 2;24(1):1756. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19252-9.
2002 年至 2017 年间欧洲成年人自报久坐时间相关因素的时间趋势。
PLoS One. 2019 Nov 12;14(11):e0225228. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225228. eCollection 2019.
4
Sitting Time, Physical Activity, and Risk of Mortality in Adults.久坐时间、身体活动与成年人的死亡率风险。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Apr 30;73(16):2062-2072. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.02.031.
5
A global systematic scoping review of studies analysing indicators, development, and content of national-level physical activity and sedentary behaviour policies.一项全球性系统范围综述研究,分析了国家级体力活动和久坐行为政策的指标、制定和内容。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2018 Nov 28;15(1):123. doi: 10.1186/s12966-018-0742-9.
6
Sedentariness and Health: Is Sedentary Behavior More Than Just Physical Inactivity?久坐与健康:久坐行为是否不仅仅是缺乏身体活动?
Front Public Health. 2018 Sep 10;6:258. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00258. eCollection 2018.
7
Do the associations of sedentary behaviour with cardiovascular disease mortality and cancer mortality differ by physical activity level? A systematic review and harmonised meta-analysis of data from 850 060 participants.久坐行为与心血管疾病死亡率和癌症死亡率的关联是否因身体活动水平而异?来自 850060 名参与者的数据的系统评价和协调荟萃分析。
Br J Sports Med. 2019 Jul;53(14):886-894. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2017-098963. Epub 2018 Jul 10.
8
The 2017 Dutch Physical Activity Guidelines.2017 年荷兰体力活动指南。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2018 Jun 25;15(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s12966-018-0661-9.
9
Is the time right for quantitative public health guidelines on sitting? A narrative review of sedentary behaviour research paradigms and findings.制定量化的公众健康坐姿指南是否恰逢其时?对久坐行为研究范式和研究结果的叙述性综述。
Br J Sports Med. 2019 Mar;53(6):377-382. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2018-099131. Epub 2018 Jun 10.
10
Reducing sitting time versus adding exercise: differential effects on biomarkers of endothelial dysfunction and metabolic risk.减少久坐时间与增加运动:对血管内皮功能障碍和代谢风险生物标志物的不同影响。
Sci Rep. 2018 Jun 5;8(1):8657. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-26616-w.