Suppr超能文献

评估军事研究环境中用于评估膳食摄入量的现有方法:范围综述。

Evaluation of the current methods used for assessing dietary intake in military research settings: a scoping review.

机构信息

HQ Army Recruiting and Initial Training Command, UK Ministry of Defence, Upavon, UK

Cambridge Centre for Sport and Exercise Sciences, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Mil Health. 2021 Apr;167(2):126-130. doi: 10.1136/bmjmilitary-2020-001436. Epub 2020 Aug 27.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

It is important to collate the literature that has assessed dietary intake within military settings to establish which methods are commonly used and which are valid so that accurate nutrition recommendations can be made. This scoping review aims to identify which methods are typically used to assess dietary intake in military settings and which of these have been validated. This review also aims to provide a recommendation as to which method(s) should be used in military settings.

METHODS

This scoping review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews. Searches were conducted in PubMed, Web of Science and SPORTDiscus with the most recent search executed on 12th June 2020. Eligible studies had to report original data, assess and quantify dietary intake and have been published in peer-reviewed academic journals. The reporting bias was calculated for each study where possible.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight studies used a single method to assess dietary intake and seven studies used a combination of methods. The most commonly used methods were the gold standard food intake/waste method, Food Frequency Questionnaire (FFQ) or a food diary (FD). The only method to date that has been validated in military settings is weighed food records (WFR).

CONCLUSIONS

The food intake/waste method or WFR should be used where feasible. Where this is not practical the FFQ or FD should be considered with control measures applied. There is currently not sufficient evidence to state that using multiple methods together improves validity.

摘要

简介

整理评估军事环境下饮食摄入的文献很重要,以确定哪些方法是常用的,哪些是有效的,从而可以做出准确的营养建议。本范围综述旨在确定通常用于评估军事环境下饮食摄入的方法,以及这些方法中有哪些已经过验证。本综述还旨在就军事环境中应使用哪种方法提供建议。

方法

本范围综述是根据系统评价和荟萃分析扩展的首选报告项目进行的,对 PubMed、Web of Science 和 SPORTDiscus 进行了检索,最近一次检索于 2020 年 6 月 12 日进行。合格的研究必须报告原始数据,评估和量化饮食摄入,并已在同行评审的学术期刊上发表。尽可能对每个研究进行报告偏倚计算。

结果

28 项研究使用单一方法评估饮食摄入,7 项研究使用多种方法组合。最常用的方法是黄金标准食物摄入量/废物法、食物频率问卷(FFQ)或食物日记(FD)。迄今为止,唯一在军事环境中得到验证的方法是称重食物记录(WFR)。

结论

在可行的情况下,应使用食物摄入量/废物法或 WFR。在不实际的情况下,应考虑使用 FFQ 或 FD,并采取控制措施。目前没有足够的证据表明使用多种方法结合可以提高有效性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验