Laboratory of Molecular Microbiology, Global Health Institute, School of Life Sciences, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, CH-1015, Switzerland.
Environ Microbiol. 2020 Oct;22(10):4149-4166. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.15214. Epub 2020 Sep 9.
The human pathogen Vibrio cholerae serves as a model organism for many important processes ranging from pathogenesis to natural transformation, which has been extensively studied in this bacterium. Previous work has deciphered important regulatory circuits involved in natural competence induction as well as mechanistic details related to its DNA acquisition and uptake potential. However, since competence was first reported for V. cholerae in 2005, many researchers have struggled with reproducibility in certain strains. In this study, we therefore compare prominent seventh pandemic V. cholerae isolates, namely strains A1552, N16961, C6706, C6709, E7946, P27459, and the close relative MO10, for their natural transformability and decipher underlying defects that mask the high degree of competence conservation. Through a combination of experimental approaches and comparative genomics based on new whole-genome sequences and de novo assemblies, we identify several strain-specific defects, mostly in genes that encode key players in quorum sensing. Moreover, we provide evidence that most of these deficiencies might have recently occurred through laboratory domestication events or through the acquisition of mobile genetic elements. Lastly, we highlight that differing experimental approaches between research groups might explain more of the variations than strain-specific alterations.
人类病原体霍乱弧菌是许多重要过程的模式生物,从发病机制到自然转化,在这种细菌中得到了广泛研究。以前的工作已经破译了自然感受性诱导中涉及的重要调节回路以及与其 DNA 获取和摄取潜力相关的机制细节。然而,自从 2005 年霍乱弧菌首次报道有感受性以来,许多研究人员在某些菌株的重现性方面遇到了困难。在这项研究中,我们因此比较了第七次大流行霍乱弧菌的主要分离株,即菌株 A1552、N16961、C6706、C6709、E7946、P27459 和近亲 MO10,以比较它们的自然转化能力,并揭示掩盖高程度感受性保守性的潜在缺陷。通过实验方法的组合和基于新全基因组序列和从头组装的比较基因组学,我们确定了几个菌株特异性缺陷,主要在群体感应中关键因子的基因中。此外,我们提供的证据表明,这些缺陷中的大多数可能是最近通过实验室驯化事件或通过获得移动遗传元件而发生的。最后,我们强调,研究小组之间不同的实验方法可能比菌株特异性改变解释更多的变异。