探究心理灵活性、换位思考和共情关注在普遍偏见中的作用。
Examining the role of psychological inflexibility, perspective taking, and empathic concern in generalized prejudice.
作者信息
Levin Michael E, Luoma Jason B, Vilardaga Roger, Lillis Jason, Nobles Richard, Hayes Steven C
机构信息
Department of Psychology, Utah State University.
Portland Psychotherapy Clinic, Research, and Training Center.
出版信息
J Appl Soc Psychol. 2016 Mar;46(3):180-191. doi: 10.1111/jasp.12355. Epub 2015 Oct 13.
Abstract
Research to-date on generalized prejudice has focused primarily on personality factors. Further work is needed identifying manipulable variables that directly inform antiprejudice interventions. This study examined three such variables: empathic concern, perspective taking, and psychological inflexibility/flexibility with prejudiced thoughts, as a test of the flexible connectedness model. A sample of 604 undergraduate students completed online surveys. A model indicated prejudice measures loaded onto a latent variable of generalized prejudice. In a second model, psychological inflexibility, flexibility, empathic concern, and perspective taking were all significant, independent predictors of generalized prejudice. Psychological inflexibility also predicted prejudice above and beyond personality and general inflexibility variables. Results suggest the three components of the flexible connectedness model may be important targets for prejudice interventions.
摘要
迄今为止，关于普遍偏见的研究主要集中在人格因素上。需要进一步开展工作，以确定能够直接为反偏见干预措施提供信息的可操控变量。本研究考察了三个这样的变量：共情关注、观点采择以及对偏见性想法的心理僵化/灵活性，以此来检验灵活联结模型。604名本科生样本完成了在线调查。一个模型表明，偏见测量指标加载到了一个普遍偏见的潜在变量上。在第二个模型中，心理僵化、灵活性、共情关注和观点采择都是普遍偏见的显著独立预测因素。心理僵化还在人格和一般僵化变量之外预测了偏见。结果表明，灵活联结模型的这三个组成部分可能是偏见干预的重要目标。
相似文献
1
Examining the role of psychological inflexibility, perspective taking, and empathic concern in generalized prejudice.探究心理灵活性、换位思考和共情关注在普遍偏见中的作用。
J Appl Soc Psychol. 2016 Mar;46(3):180-191. doi: 10.1111/jasp.12355. Epub 2015 Oct 13.
2
Empathy trumps prejudice: The longitudinal relation between empathy and anti-immigrant attitudes in adolescence.同理心胜过偏见：青少年同理心与反移民态度的纵向关系。
Dev Psychol. 2018 Apr;54(4):703-717. doi: 10.1037/dev0000474. Epub 2017 Dec 14.
3
Psychological Flexibility With Prejudices Increases Empathy and Decreases Distress Among Adolescents: A Spanish Validation of the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-Stigma.青少年中带有偏见的心理灵活性可增强同理心并减轻痛苦：《接纳与行动问卷-污名》的西班牙文验证版
Front Psychol. 2021 Jan 22;11:565638. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.565638. eCollection 2020.
4
"I Feel You!": The Role of Empathic Competences in Reducing Ethnic Prejudice Among Adolescents.“我理解你！”：同理心能力在减少青少年中的种族偏见中的作用。
J Youth Adolesc. 2022 Oct;51(10):1970-1982. doi: 10.1007/s10964-022-01650-0. Epub 2022 Jul 1.
5
The Acceptance and Action Questionnaire - Stigma (AAQ-S): Developing a measure of psychological flexibility with stigmatizing thoughts.接纳与行动问卷-污名化（AAQ-S）：开发一种用于测量伴有污名化想法的心理灵活性的量表。
J Contextual Behav Sci. 2014 Jan;3(1):21-26. doi: 10.1016/j.jcbs.2013.11.003.
6
Seeing their side versus feeling their pain: Differential consequences of perspective-taking and empathy at work.从自身视角看待问题与感受他人痛苦：工作中换位思考和同理心的不同后果。
J Appl Psychol. 2018 Aug;103(8):894-915. doi: 10.1037/apl0000307. Epub 2018 Apr 16.
7
Teasing apart low mindfulness: differentiating deficits in mindfulness and in psychological flexibility in predicting symptoms of generalized anxiety disorder and depression.剖析低正念：区分正念缺陷与心理灵活性缺陷在预测广泛性焦虑症和抑郁症症状方面的差异
J Affect Disord. 2014 Sep;166:41-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2014.04.062. Epub 2014 May 9.
8
Psychological inflexibility predicts PTSD symptom severity in war veterans after accounting for established PTSD risk factors and personality.心理不灵活性可预测 PTSD 风险因素和人格既定后退伍军人 PTSD 症状严重程度。
Psychol Trauma. 2019 May;11(4):383-390. doi: 10.1037/tra0000358. Epub 2018 Aug 27.
9
Who Is Prejudiced, and Toward Whom? The Big Five Traits and Generalized Prejudice.谁有偏见，以及针对谁？五大特质与泛化偏见。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2019 Oct;45(10):1455-1467. doi: 10.1177/0146167219832335. Epub 2019 Mar 21.
10
An Examination of the Role of Psychological Inflexibility in Hoarding Using Multiple Mediator Models.使用多重中介模型考察心理僵化在囤积行为中的作用
J Cogn Psychother. 2018 Jun;32(2):97-111. doi: 10.1891/0889-8391.32.2.97.
引用本文的文献
1
Impact of group training on compassion, empathy, and stigmatizing thoughts: a diversity, equity, and inclusion pilot RCT.团体培训对同情心、同理心和污名化思维的影响：一项多元化、公平性和包容性的随机对照试验试点研究
Front Psychol. 2025 Jun 20;16:1547645. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1547645. eCollection 2025.
2
A relational frame approach to perspective taking in persons with Borderline Personality Disorder.一种针对边缘型人格障碍患者视角采择的关系框架方法。
J Contextual Behav Sci. 2024 Apr;32. doi: 10.1016/j.jcbs.2024.100777. Epub 2024 May 18.
3
Diversity, dissent, and fragmentation in the #MeToo movement: the role of collective and individual dimensions.#MeToo运动中的多样性、异议与分裂：集体与个体层面的作用
Front Psychol. 2024 Jun 26;15:1290065. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1290065. eCollection 2024.
4
Measurement of psychological inflexibility: an examination of the psychometric properties of the AAQ-3 compared to AAQ-II.心理灵活性的测量：与 AAQ-II 相比，AAQ-3 的心理测量学特性的检验。
BMC Psychol. 2023 Sep 30;11(1):300. doi: 10.1186/s40359-023-01318-9.
5
A network analysis of psychological flexibility, coping, and stigma in dermatology patients.皮肤病患者心理灵活性、应对方式和耻辱感的网络分析
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 May 16;10:1075672. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1075672. eCollection 2023.
6
Psychological mechanism of acceptance and commitment therapy and rational emotive behavior therapy for treating hoarding: Evidence from randomized controlled trials.接纳与承诺疗法和理性情绪行为疗法治疗囤积症的心理机制：来自随机对照试验的证据。
Front Public Health. 2023 Feb 10;11:1084467. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1084467. eCollection 2023.
7
Does social intolerance vary according to cognitive styles, genetic cognitive capacity, or education?社会包容性是否因认知风格、遗传认知能力或教育而异？
Brain Behav. 2022 Sep;12(9):e2704. doi: 10.1002/brb3.2704. Epub 2022 Sep 1.
8
Corona Concerts: The Effect of Virtual Concert Characteristics on Social Connection and .新冠音乐会：虚拟音乐会特征对社交联系的影响及…… （原文似乎不完整）
Front Psychol. 2021 Jun 22;12:648448. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.648448. eCollection 2021.
9
Sustaining Personal Activism: Behavior Analysts as Antiracist Accomplices.维持个人行动主义：行为分析师作为反种族主义的同谋者。
Behav Anal Pract. 2021 Jun 2;15(4):1066-1073. doi: 10.1007/s40617-021-00580-w. eCollection 2022 Dec.
10
Investigating the Relationship between University Students' Psychological Flexibility and College Self-Efficacy.探究大学生心理灵活性与大学自我效能感之间的关系。
J Coll Stud Ret. 2020 Aug 1;22(2):351-372. doi: 10.1177/1521025117751071. Epub 2018 Jan 9.
本文引用的文献
1
Examining psychological inflexibility as a transdiagnostic process across psychological disorders.将心理灵活性作为一种跨心理障碍的跨诊断过程进行研究。
J Contextual Behav Sci. 2014 Jul;3(3):155-163. doi: 10.1016/j.jcbs.2014.06.003.
2
The Acceptance and Action Questionnaire - Stigma (AAQ-S): Developing a measure of psychological flexibility with stigmatizing thoughts.接纳与行动问卷-污名化（AAQ-S）：开发一种用于测量伴有污名化想法的心理灵活性的量表。
J Contextual Behav Sci. 2014 Jan;3(1):21-26. doi: 10.1016/j.jcbs.2013.11.003.
3
Preliminary psychometric properties of the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II: a revised measure of psychological inflexibility and experiential avoidance.接纳与行动问卷-II 的初步心理测量特性：修订版的心理灵活性和体验回避度量。
Behav Ther. 2011 Dec;42(4):676-88. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2011.03.007. Epub 2011 May 25.
4
Perspective taking combats automatic expressions of racial bias.换位思考能消除种族偏见的自动表达。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2011 Jun;100(6):1027-42. doi: 10.1037/a0022308.
5
Open, aware, and active: contextual approaches as an emerging trend in the behavioral and cognitive therapies.开放、觉察和主动：行为和认知疗法中的新兴趋势——语境方法。
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2011;7:141-68. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032210-104449.
6
Generalized prejudice: common and specific components.广义偏见：共同成分与特定成分
Psychol Sci. 2011 Jan;22(1):57-9. doi: 10.1177/0956797610390384. Epub 2010 Nov 24.
7
The Sociology of Discrimination: Racial Discrimination in Employment, Housing, Credit, and Consumer Markets.《歧视社会学：就业、住房、信贷和消费市场中的种族歧视》
Annu Rev Sociol. 2008 Jan 1;34:181-209. doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.33.040406.131740.
8
Perceived discrimination and health: a meta-analytic review.感知到的歧视与健康：一项荟萃分析综述
Psychol Bull. 2009 Jul;135(4):531-54. doi: 10.1037/a0016059.
9
The stigma of obesity: a review and update.肥胖的污名：综述与更新
Obesity (Silver Spring). 2009 May;17(5):941-64. doi: 10.1038/oby.2008.636. Epub 2009 Jan 22.
10
Prejudice reduction: what works? A review and assessment of research and practice.减少偏见：哪些方法有效？对研究与实践的综述及评估。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2009;60:339-67. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163607.
Zotero 插件