School of Engineering and the Built Environment, Bishop Hall Lane, Anglia Ruskin University, Essex, CM1 1SQ, UK.
São Carlos School of Engineering, University of São Paulo, São Carlos, São Paulo, CEP 13560-590, Brazil.
J Environ Manage. 2020 Dec 1;275:111173. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111173. Epub 2020 Aug 28.
The necessity of incorporating a resilience-informed approach into urban planning and its decision-making is felt now more than any time previously, particularly in low and middle income countries. In order to achieve a successful transition to sustainable, resilient and cost-effective cities, there is a growing attention given to more effective integration of nature-based solutions, such as Sustainable Drainage Systems (SuDS), with other urban components. The experience of SuDS integration with urban planning, in developed cities, has proven to be an effective strategy with a wide range of advantages and lower costs. The effective design and implementation of SuDS requires a multi-objective approach by which all four pillars of SuDS design (i.e., water quality, water quantity, amenity and biodiversity) are considered in connection to other urban, social, and economic aspects and constraints. This study develops a resilience-driven multi-objective optimisation model aiming to provide a Pareto-front of optimised solutions for effective incorporation of SuDS into (peri)urban planning, applied to a case study in Brazil. This model adopts the SuDS's two pillars of water quality and water quantity as the optimisation objectives with its level of spatial distribution as decision variables. Also, an improved quality of life index (iQoL) is developed to re-evaluate the optimal engineering solutions to encompass the amenity and biodiversity pillars of SuDS. Rain barrels, green roofs, bio-retention tanks, vegetation grass swales and permeable pavements are the suitable SuDS options identified in this study. The findings show that the most resilient solutions are costly but this does not guarantee higher iQoL values. Bio-retention tanks and grass swales play effective roles in promotion of water quality resilience but this comes with considerable increase in costs. Permeable pavements and green roofs are effective strategies when flood resilience is a priority. Rain barrel is a preferred solution due to the dominance of residential areas in the study area and the lower cost of this option.
将具有弹性思维的方法纳入城市规划及其决策的必要性,现在比以往任何时候都更加明显,尤其是在中低收入国家。为了实现向可持续、有弹性和具有成本效益的城市的成功转型,人们越来越关注更有效地将基于自然的解决方案(如可持续排水系统 (SuDS))与其他城市组成部分结合起来。在发达城市,SuDS 与城市规划的整合经验已被证明是一种有效的策略,具有广泛的优势和更低的成本。SuDS 的有效设计和实施需要采用多目标方法,即将 SuDS 设计的四个支柱(即水质、水量、美观和生物多样性)与其他城市、社会和经济方面和约束条件联系起来考虑。本研究开发了一种具有弹性思维的多目标优化模型,旨在为将 SuDS 有效纳入(城郊)规划提供一个优化解决方案的帕累托前沿,应用于巴西的一个案例研究。该模型采用 SuDS 的水质和水量两个支柱作为优化目标,其空间分布水平作为决策变量。此外,还开发了一个改进的生活质量指数 (iQoL),以重新评估最优工程解决方案,涵盖 SuDS 的美观和生物多样性支柱。雨水桶、绿色屋顶、生物滞留池、植被草沟和透水铺面是本研究中确定的合适的 SuDS 选项。研究结果表明,最具弹性的解决方案成本较高,但这并不能保证更高的 iQoL 值。生物滞留池和草沟在促进水质弹性方面发挥了有效作用,但这会带来相当大的成本增加。透水铺面和绿色屋顶是洪水弹性优先考虑的有效策略。雨水桶是首选解决方案,因为研究区域以住宅区为主,且该方案成本较低。