• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

严重急性呼吸综合征、中东呼吸综合征和2019冠状病毒病的治疗选择:临床证据综述

Treatment Options for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome, Middle East Respiratory Syndrome, and Coronavirus Disease 2019: a Review of Clinical Evidence.

作者信息

Hoang Tung, Anh Tho Tran Thi

机构信息

Department of Cancer Biomedical Science, National Cancer Center Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, Goyang, Korea.

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Nghe An Oncology Hospital, Nghe An, Vietnam.

出版信息

Infect Chemother. 2020 Sep;52(3):317-334. doi: 10.3947/ic.2020.52.3.317. Epub 2020 Sep 16.

DOI:10.3947/ic.2020.52.3.317
PMID:32869558
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7533202/
Abstract

Coronaviruses have caused serious Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS), Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS), and Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreaks, and only remdesivir has been recently indicated for the treatment of COVID-19. In the line of therapeutic options for SARS and MERS, this study aims to summarize the current clinical evidence of treatment options for COVID-19. In general, the combination of antibiotics, ribavirin, and corticosteroids was considered as a standard treatment for patients with SARS. The addition of this conventional treatment with lopinavir/ritonavir, interferon, and convalescent plasma showed potential clinical improvement. For patients with MERS, ribavirin, lopinavir/ritonavir, interferon, and convalescent plasma were continuously recommended. However, a high-dose of corticosteroid was suggested for severe cases only. The use of lopinavir/ritonavir and convalescent plasma was commonly reported. There was limited evidence for the effect of corticosteroids, other antiviral drugs like ribavirin, and favipiravir. Monoclonal antibody of tocilizumab and antimalarial agents of chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine were also introduced. Among antibiotics for infection therapy, azithromycin was suggested. In conclusion, this study showed the up-to-date evidence of treatment options for COVID-19 that is helpful for the therapy selection and the development of further guidelines and recommendations. Updates of on-going clinical trials and observational studies may confirm the current findings.

摘要

冠状病毒已引发严重的严重急性呼吸综合征(SARS)、中东呼吸综合征(MERS)和2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)疫情,且近期仅有瑞德西韦被批准用于治疗COVID-19。作为SARS和MERS的治疗选择,本研究旨在总结COVID-19治疗选择的当前临床证据。一般来说,抗生素、利巴韦林和皮质类固醇的联合应用被视为SARS患者的标准治疗方法。在这种传统治疗基础上加用洛匹那韦/利托那韦、干扰素和康复期血浆显示出潜在的临床改善效果。对于MERS患者,持续推荐使用利巴韦林、洛匹那韦/利托那韦、干扰素和康复期血浆。然而,仅建议对重症病例使用高剂量皮质类固醇。普遍报道了洛匹那韦/利托那韦和康复期血浆的使用情况。关于皮质类固醇、利巴韦林等其他抗病毒药物以及法匹拉韦的疗效证据有限。还引入了托珠单抗单克隆抗体以及氯喹和羟氯喹等抗疟药。在用于感染治疗的抗生素中,建议使用阿奇霉素。总之,本研究展示了COVID-19治疗选择的最新证据,这有助于治疗方案的选择以及进一步指南和建议的制定。正在进行的临床试验和观察性研究的更新可能会证实当前的研究结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0fc9/7533202/d902d1cd0525/ic-52-317-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0fc9/7533202/2438a9cca8d9/ic-52-317-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0fc9/7533202/d902d1cd0525/ic-52-317-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0fc9/7533202/2438a9cca8d9/ic-52-317-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0fc9/7533202/d902d1cd0525/ic-52-317-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Treatment Options for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome, Middle East Respiratory Syndrome, and Coronavirus Disease 2019: a Review of Clinical Evidence.严重急性呼吸综合征、中东呼吸综合征和2019冠状病毒病的治疗选择:临床证据综述
Infect Chemother. 2020 Sep;52(3):317-334. doi: 10.3947/ic.2020.52.3.317. Epub 2020 Sep 16.
2
Insights into antiviral mechanisms of remdesivir, lopinavir/ritonavir and chloroquine/hydroxychloroquine affecting the new SARS-CoV-2.瑞德西韦、洛匹那韦/利托那韦和氯喹/羟氯喹影响新型 SARS-CoV-2 的抗病毒机制研究进展。
Biomed Pharmacother. 2020 Nov;131:110668. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2020.110668. Epub 2020 Aug 24.
3
Current therapeutic options for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-lessons learned from severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) and Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) therapy: a systematic review protocol.2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的当前治疗选择——从严重急性呼吸综合征(SARS)和中东呼吸综合征(MERS)治疗中吸取的经验教训:一项系统评价方案
Ann Transl Med. 2020 Nov;8(22):1527. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-2340.
4
Safety and efficacy of antiviral combination therapy in symptomatic patients of Covid-19 infection - a randomised controlled trial (SEV-COVID Trial): A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.抗病毒联合治疗在新冠病毒感染有症状患者中的安全性和有效性 - 一项随机对照试验(SEV-COVID 试验):一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2020 Oct 20;21(1):866. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04774-5.
5
Efficacy and safety of current therapeutic options for COVID-19 - lessons to be learnt from SARS and MERS epidemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis.当前治疗 COVID-19 的方法的疗效和安全性 - 从 SARS 和 MERS 疫情中吸取的教训:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Pharmacol Res. 2020 Jul;157:104872. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2020.104872. Epub 2020 Apr 30.
6
Efficacy and safety of antiviral treatment for COVID-19 from evidence in studies of SARS-CoV-2 and other acute viral infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis.抗 SARS-CoV-2 和其他急性病毒感染的抗病毒治疗 COVID-19 的疗效和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
CMAJ. 2020 Jul 6;192(27):E734-E744. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.200647. Epub 2020 Jun 3.
7
Compounds with Therapeutic Potential against Novel Respiratory 2019 Coronavirus.具有治疗新型呼吸道 2019 冠状病毒潜力的化合物。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2020 Apr 21;64(5). doi: 10.1128/AAC.00399-20.
8
Potential specific therapies in COVID-19.新冠肺炎的潜在特效疗法。
Ther Adv Respir Dis. 2020 Jan-Dec;14:1753466620926853. doi: 10.1177/1753466620926853.
9
Potential Antiviral Drugs for SARS-Cov-2 Treatment: Preclinical Findings and Ongoing Clinical Research.用于 SARS-CoV-2 治疗的潜在抗病毒药物:临床前发现和正在进行的临床研究。
In Vivo. 2020 Jun;34(3 Suppl):1597-1602. doi: 10.21873/invivo.11949.
10
Lopinavir/ritonavir for the treatment of SARS, MERS and COVID-19: a systematic review.洛匹那韦/利托那韦治疗严重急性呼吸综合征、中东呼吸综合征和 COVID-19:系统评价。
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2020 Aug;24(16):8592-8605. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202008_22659.

引用本文的文献

1
COVID-19 in comorbid chronic diseased patients, pregnant and lactating women: pathophysiology, available drug treatment, and the most suitable protocol regimen in each group.合并慢性疾病患者、孕妇和哺乳期妇女中的新型冠状病毒肺炎:病理生理学、可用药物治疗以及每组最合适的方案疗程
Inflammopharmacology. 2025 Aug 12. doi: 10.1007/s10787-025-01829-4.
2
How We Have Treated Severe to Critically Ill Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019 in Korea.韩国如何治疗严重至危重症 2019 冠状病毒病患者。
J Korean Med Sci. 2022 Dec 19;37(49):e353. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2022.37.e353.
3
Repurposing of Chemotherapeutics to Combat COVID-19.

本文引用的文献

1
On the origin and continuing evolution of SARS-CoV-2.关于严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)的起源及持续进化
Natl Sci Rev. 2020 Jun;7(6):1012-1023. doi: 10.1093/nsr/nwaa036. Epub 2020 Mar 3.
2
Assessment of QT Intervals in a Case Series of Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Infection Treated With Hydroxychloroquine Alone or in Combination With Azithromycin in an Intensive Care Unit.评估单独使用羟氯喹或联合使用阿奇霉素在重症监护病房治疗的 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)感染患者的 QT 间期。
JAMA Cardiol. 2020 Sep 1;5(9):1067-1069. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.1787.
3
Outcomes of Hydroxychloroquine Usage in United States Veterans Hospitalized with COVID-19.
化疗药物用于抗击新型冠状病毒肺炎的新用途
Curr Top Med Chem. 2022;22(32):2660-2694. doi: 10.2174/1568026623666221130142517.
4
A Transient Effect of Convalescent Plasma Therapy in a Patient with Severe Covonavirus Disease 2019: A Case Report.康复期血浆疗法对一名重症2019冠状病毒病患者的短暂疗效:一例报告
Infect Chemother. 2022 Sep;54(3):553-558. doi: 10.3947/ic.2020.0089. Epub 2022 Jun 22.
5
Screening Potential Drugs for COVID-19 Based on Bound Nuclear Norm Regularization.基于核范数约束的新型冠状病毒肺炎潜在药物筛选
Front Genet. 2021 Oct 7;12:749256. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2021.749256. eCollection 2021.
6
Comparison of Comorbidities in Relation to Critical Conditions among Coronavirus Disease 2019 Patients: A Network Meta-Analysis.2019年冠状病毒病患者中合并症与危重症的关系比较:一项网状Meta分析
Infect Chemother. 2021 Mar;53(1):13-28. doi: 10.3947/ic.2020.0136.
7
Clinical and Virologic Effectiveness of Remdesivir Treatment for Severe Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Korea: a Nationwide Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study.韩国瑞德西韦治疗严重 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的临床和病毒学疗效:一项全国多中心回顾性队列研究。
J Korean Med Sci. 2021 Mar 22;36(11):e83. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2021.36.e83.
8
Genetic Susceptibility of ACE2 and TMPRSS2 in Six Common Cancers and Possible Impacts on COVID-19.ACE2 和 TMPRSS2 在六种常见癌症中的遗传易感性及其对 COVID-19 的可能影响。
Cancer Res Treat. 2021 Jul;53(3):650-656. doi: 10.4143/crt.2020.950. Epub 2020 Dec 29.
羟氯喹在美国 COVID-19 住院患者中的使用效果。
Med. 2020 Dec 18;1(1):114-127.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.medj.2020.06.001. Epub 2020 Jun 5.
4
Cytokine storm induced by SARS-CoV-2.由 SARS-CoV-2 引起的细胞因子风暴。
Clin Chim Acta. 2020 Oct;509:280-287. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2020.06.017. Epub 2020 Jun 10.
5
Chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine for COVID-19: why might they be hazardous?氯喹或羟氯喹用于治疗新型冠状病毒肺炎:为何它们可能具有危险性?
Lancet. 2020 May 22. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31174-0.
6
Factors associated with prolonged viral shedding and impact of lopinavir/ritonavir treatment in hospitalised non-critically ill patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection.与 SARS-CoV-2 感染住院非重症患者病毒持续排出相关因素及洛匹那韦/利托那韦治疗的影响。
Eur Respir J. 2020 Jul 16;56(1). doi: 10.1183/13993003.00799-2020. Print 2020 Jul.
7
The role of interleukin-6 in monitoring severe case of coronavirus disease 2019.白细胞介素-6 在监测 2019 年冠状病毒病重症病例中的作用。
EMBO Mol Med. 2020 Jul 7;12(7):e12421. doi: 10.15252/emmm.202012421. Epub 2020 Jun 5.
8
Remdesivir in adults with severe COVID-19: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre trial.瑞德西韦治疗成人重症 COVID-19 的随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、多中心临床试验。
Lancet. 2020 May 16;395(10236):1569-1578. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31022-9. Epub 2020 Apr 29.
9
Low dose of hydroxychloroquine reduces fatality of critically ill patients with COVID-19.羟氯喹低剂量可降低 COVID-19 重症患者的死亡率。
Sci China Life Sci. 2020 Oct;63(10):1515-1521. doi: 10.1007/s11427-020-1732-2. Epub 2020 May 15.
10
Clinical efficacy of hydroxychloroquine in patients with covid-19 pneumonia who require oxygen: observational comparative study using routine care data.羟氯喹治疗需要吸氧的 COVID-19 肺炎患者的临床疗效:利用常规护理数据进行的观察性对比研究。
BMJ. 2020 May 14;369:m1844. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m1844.