Suppr超能文献

坦贝莱坎叶(L.)和科帕桑达叶(L.)提取物对……的抗菌活性。

The antibacterial activity of Tembelekan leaf ( L.) and Kopasanda leaf ( L.) extracts against .

作者信息

Rasyid Sri Anggarini, Surya Ridwan Adi, Natalia Wa Ode Rejeki

机构信息

D-IV Medical Laboratory Technology Study Program, Mandala Waluya Health Science College.

Department of Environmental Science, Halu Oleo University, Kemaraya Kendari Southeast Sulawesi, Indonesia.

出版信息

Infect Dis Rep. 2020 Jul 7;12(Suppl 1):8734. doi: 10.4081/idr.2020.8734.

Abstract

() is a round-shaped Gram-positive bacteria that caused infection in the human body. infection can be inhibited by the use of antibiotics. However, these bacteria displayed resistance to some antibiotics. The purpose of this study is to determine the effects of Tembelekan (.) and Kopasanda () leaf extracts against . The method used in this study is the disc method to determine the inhibition zone. The test results showed there was no significant difference in the sensitivity of Tembelekan leaf extract () and Kopasanda leaf extract () against (P0.8>α0.05). However, based on the average value of the inhibition zone, Kopasanda leaf extract was showed higher inhibition zone compared to Tembelekan leaf extract. In conclusion, Tembelekan leaf and Kopasanda leaf at a concentration of 100% were produced inhibition zones of 0.6 cm and 0.8 cm respectively against

摘要

()是一种圆形革兰氏阳性细菌,可导致人体感染。使用抗生素可抑制感染。然而,这些细菌对某些抗生素表现出耐药性。本研究的目的是确定滕贝莱坎(.)和科帕桑达(.)叶提取物对()的影响。本研究采用纸片法测定抑菌圈。试验结果表明,滕贝莱坎叶提取物()和科帕桑达叶提取物()对()的敏感性无显著差异(P0.8>α0.05)。然而,根据抑菌圈的平均值,科帕桑达叶提取物的抑菌圈比滕贝莱坎叶提取物更高。总之,浓度为100%的滕贝莱坎叶和科帕桑达叶对()分别产生了0.6厘米和0.8厘米的抑菌圈

相似文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验