Joo So Young, Lee Seung Yeol, Cho Yoon Soo, Lee Kuem Ju, Seo Cheong Hoon
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Hangang Sacred Heart Hospital, College of Medicine, Hallym University, Seoul 07247, Korea.
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, College of Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Hospital, Bucheon 14584, Korea.
J Clin Med. 2020 Aug 31;9(9):2813. doi: 10.3390/jcm9092813.
This study investigated the effects of robot-assisted gait training (RAGT) on gait function in burn patients. Briefly, 40 burn patients were randomly divided into an RAGT group or a conventional training (CON) group. SUBAR (Cretem, Korea) is a wearable robot with a footplate that simulates normal gait cycles. The RAGT group underwent 30 min of robot-assisted training using SUBAR with 30 min of conventional physiotherapy once a day, 5 days a week for 12 weeks. Patients in the CON group received 30 min of overground gait training and range-of-motion (ROM) exercises twice a day for 5 days a week for 12 weeks. The RAGT group and the CON group underwent 60 min of training per day. The intervention frequency and duration did not differ between the RAGT group and the CON group. The main outcomes were functional ambulatory category (FAC); 6-min walking test (6MWT); visual analogue scale (VAS) during gait movement; ROM; and isometric forces of bilateral hip, knee, and ankle muscles before and after 12 weeks of training. The results of the VAS, FAC, and 6MWT (8.06 ± 0.66, 1.76 ± 0.56, and 204.41 ± 85.60) before training in the RAGT group improved significantly (4.41 ± 1.18, 4.18 ± 0.39, and 298.53 ± 47.75) after training (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, and p < 0.001). The results of the VAS, FAC, and 6MWT (8.00 ± 1.21, 1.75 ± 0.58, and 220.94 ± 116.88) before training in the CON group improved significantly (5.00 ± 1.03, 3.81 ± 1.05, and 272.19 ± 110.14) after training (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, and p = 0.05). There were differences in the improvement of results of the VAS, FAC, and 6MWT between groups after training, but they were not statistically significant (p = 0.23, p = 0.14, and p = 0.05). The isometric strengths of the right hip extensor (p = 0.02), bilateral knee flexor (p = 0.04 in the right, and p = 0.001 in the left), bilateral knee extensor (p = 0.003 in the right, and p = 0.002 in the left), bilateral ankle dorsiflexor (p = 0.04 in the right, and p = 0.02 in the left), and bilateral ankle plantarflexor (p = 0.001 in the right, and p = 0.008 in the left) after training were significantly improved compared with those before training in the RAGT group. The ROMs of the right knee extension (p = 0.03) and bilateral ankle plantarflexion (p = 0.008 in the right, and p = 0.03 in the left) were significantly improved compared with measurements before training in the RAGT. There were no significant differences of the isometric strengths and ROMs of the bilateral hip, knee, and ankle muscles after training in the CON group. There were significant improvements in the isometric strengths of the left knee flexor ( = 0.01), left ankle dorsiflexor ( = 0.01), and left ankle plantarflexor ( = 0.003) between the two groups. The results suggested that RAGT is effective to facilitate early recovery of muscles strength after a burn injury. This is the first study to evaluate the effectiveness of RAGT in patients with burns compared with those receiving conventional training. The absence of complications in burn patients provides an opportunity to enlarge the application area of RAGT.
本研究调查了机器人辅助步态训练(RAGT)对烧伤患者步态功能的影响。简而言之,40名烧伤患者被随机分为RAGT组或传统训练(CON)组。SUBAR(韩国Cretem公司)是一种带有踏板的可穿戴机器人,可模拟正常步态周期。RAGT组每天使用SUBAR进行30分钟的机器人辅助训练,并结合30分钟的传统物理治疗,每周5天,共12周。CON组患者每周5天,每天进行两次30分钟的地面步态训练和关节活动度(ROM)练习,共12周。RAGT组和CON组每天训练60分钟。RAGT组和CON组的干预频率和持续时间没有差异。主要结局指标包括功能性步行分类(FAC)、6分钟步行试验(6MWT)、步态运动期间的视觉模拟评分(VAS)、ROM以及训练12周前后双侧髋部、膝部和踝部肌肉的等长肌力。RAGT组训练前VAS、FAC和6MWT的结果(8.06±0.66、1.76±0.56和204.41±85.60)在训练后显著改善(4.41±1.18、4.18±0.39和298.53±47.75)(p<0.001、p<0.001和p<0.001)。CON组训练前VAS、FAC和6MWT的结果(8.00±1.21、1.75±0.58和220.94±116.88)在训练后显著改善(5.00±1.03、3.81±1.05和272.19±110.14)(p<0.001、p<0.001和p = 0.05)。训练后两组间VAS、FAC和6MWT结果的改善存在差异,但无统计学意义(p = 0.23、p = 0.14和p = 0.05)。与训练前相比,RAGT组训练后右髋伸肌等长肌力(p = 0.02)、双侧膝屈肌(右侧p = 0.04,左侧p = 0.001)、双侧膝伸肌(右侧p = 0.003,左侧p = 0.002)、双侧踝背屈肌(右侧p = 0.04,左侧p = 0.02)和双侧踝跖屈肌(右侧p = 0.001,左侧p = 0.008)均显著改善。与训练前测量值相比,RAGT组右膝伸展ROM(p = 0.03)和双侧踝跖屈ROM(右侧p = 0.008,左侧p = 0.03)显著改善。CON组训练后双侧髋部、膝部和踝部肌肉的等长肌力和ROM无显著差异。两组间左膝屈肌(p = 0.01)、左踝背屈肌(p = 0.01)和左踝跖屈肌(p = 0.003)的等长肌力有显著改善。结果表明,RAGT有助于促进烧伤后肌肉力量的早期恢复。这是第一项评估RAGT与接受传统训练的患者相比对烧伤患者有效性的研究。烧伤患者未出现并发症为扩大RAGT的应用领域提供了机会。