American Physiological Society, Rockville, Maryland.
Evaluation for Excellence, Olney, Maryland.
Adv Physiol Educ. 2020 Dec 1;44(4):525-539. doi: 10.1152/advan.00014.2020.
Undergraduate research experiences (UREs) have proven to be one of the most valuable approaches to increasing the number of underrepresented students earning degrees in STEM fields. However, there are many questions about how these impacts occur. Improving grades, experiencing laboratory work, and working with research staff are important components, but developing a "science identity" is integral to this process. In this qualitative study, interviews with 25 past summer research fellows who are members of groups underrepresented in STEM (underrepresented minorities, persons with disabilities, first-generation college, and persons with financial or social disadvantages) provide insights into this process. The conversations validate that their summer research experiences helped them attain each of the program objectives, but their experiences differed, in part, based on their prior research experiences. Their narratives emphasized the strong impact that the program had on skills (e.g., research design, data analysis and presentation, time management/organization, writing, speaking, network development, math/statistics), confidence, motivation, and research career aspirations. As fellows learned more about research, they saw its relationship to medicine, and many integrated basic or clinical research into their career plans. Three central themes resulted from the discussions: the need to customize program goals for diverse participants, the pivotal role of the research mentor-student relationship, and the powerful impact of participating in a national scientific meeting. Recommendations for URE programs are proposed.
本科研究经历 (URE) 已被证明是增加少数族裔和弱势群体学生在 STEM 领域获得学位人数的最有效方法之一。然而,对于这些影响是如何发生的,人们仍存在许多疑问。提高成绩、体验实验室工作和与研究人员合作是重要组成部分,但培养“科学身份”是这个过程的关键。在这项定性研究中,对 25 名过去参加过夏季研究的研究员进行了采访,他们是 STEM 领域代表性不足的群体的成员(代表性不足的少数族裔、残疾人士、第一代大学生以及经济或社会困难人士),这些采访为我们提供了有关这个过程的深入见解。这些对话证实,他们的夏季研究经历有助于他们实现每个项目目标,但他们的经历因之前的研究经历而有所不同。他们的叙述强调了该项目对技能(例如研究设计、数据分析和呈现、时间管理/组织、写作、演讲、网络发展、数学/统计学)、信心、动机和研究职业抱负的巨大影响。随着研究员们对研究有了更多的了解,他们看到了研究与医学之间的关系,许多人将基础或临床研究纳入了他们的职业规划。讨论产生了三个核心主题:为不同的参与者定制项目目标的必要性、研究导师与学生关系的关键作用以及参与全国性科学会议的强大影响力。提出了 URE 项目的建议。