• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

验证农村青少年的电子健康素养量表。

Validating the eHealth Literacy Scale in Rural Adolescents.

机构信息

College of Social Work, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky.

Center of Excellence in Rural Health, Family and Community Medicine, University of Kentucky, Hazard, Kentucky.

出版信息

J Rural Health. 2021 Jun;37(3):504-516. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12509. Epub 2020 Sep 3.

DOI:10.1111/jrh.12509
PMID:32881112
Abstract

PURPOSE

Given that the recent eHealth literacy literature supports the properties of the 3-factor eHealth literacy scale (eHEALS) model in samples with millennials, adults, and older adults, the appropriate next step is to establish whether the model can be reproduced in a rural adolescent sample. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the recent 3-factor model by Paige and associates with a sample of seventh-grade students.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study included a subsample of students (n = 146) from 3 school districts in Appalachian Kentucky. We used confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) procedures and small sample model fit guidelines to evaluate our model, and the 1-sample bootstrap algorithm with bias-corrected and accelerated 95% confidence intervals to estimate associations among eHEALS and health and technology variables.

FINDINGS

A total of 137 students, or 61% of enrolled seventh-grade students, completed the study. CFA results showed eHEALS 3-factor loadings-information awareness, information seeking, and information engagement-were high (≥0.63) and statistically significant. We observed evidence of a good model fit (root mean square error of approximation [RMSEA] = 0.07, standardized root mean square residual [SRMR] = 0.03, comparative fit index [CFI] = 0.99) and results are comparable with Paige and associates' model fit (RMSEA = 0.06, SRMR = 0.08, CFI = 0.98). Correlations showed that students with more access to technology were associated with higher information seeking (r = 0.31) and higher information engagement (r = 0.23). eHealth literacy scores did not differ by level of rurality or gender.

CONCLUSIONS

The 3-factor eHEALS is a reliable and valid instrument in assessing eHealth literacy in a group of rural seventh graders from Appalachian Kentucky.

摘要

目的

鉴于最近的电子健康素养文献支持 3 因素电子健康素养量表(eHEALS)模型在千禧一代、成年人和老年人样本中的特性,下一步适当的步骤是确定该模型是否可以在农村青少年样本中复制。本研究的目的是用 Paige 等人的最近 3 因素模型评估阿巴拉契亚肯塔基州 3 个学区的 7 年级学生样本。

方法

本横断面研究包括阿巴拉契亚肯塔基州 3 个学区的学生(n = 146)的子样本。我们使用验证性因子分析(CFA)程序和小样本模型拟合指南来评估我们的模型,以及 1 个样本自举算法,具有偏差校正和加速 95%置信区间,以估计 eHEALS 与健康和技术变量之间的关联。

结果

共有 137 名学生(注册 7 年级学生的 61%)完成了研究。CFA 结果表明,eHEALS 的 3 个因素负荷(信息意识、信息搜索和信息参与)较高(≥0.63)且具有统计学意义。我们观察到模型拟合良好的证据(近似均方根误差[RMSEA] = 0.07,标准化均方根残差[SRMR] = 0.03,比较拟合指数[CFI] = 0.99),结果与 Paige 等人的模型拟合(RMSEA = 0.06,SRMR = 0.08,CFI = 0.98)相当。相关性表明,拥有更多技术访问权限的学生与更高的信息搜索(r = 0.31)和更高的信息参与(r = 0.23)相关。eHEALS 评分与农村程度或性别无关。

结论

3 因素 eHEALS 是一种可靠和有效的工具,可用于评估阿巴拉契亚肯塔基州农村 7 年级学生的电子健康素养。

相似文献

1
Validating the eHealth Literacy Scale in Rural Adolescents.验证农村青少年的电子健康素养量表。
J Rural Health. 2021 Jun;37(3):504-516. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12509. Epub 2020 Sep 3.
2
Electronic Health Literacy Across the Lifespan: Measurement Invariance Study.全生命周期的电子健康素养:测量不变性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Jul 9;20(7):e10434. doi: 10.2196/10434.
3
Measuring Electronic Health Literacy: Development, Validation, and Test of Measurement Invariance of a Revised German Version of the eHealth Literacy Scale.测量电子健康素养:电子健康素养量表修订版的德国版本的开发、验证和测量不变性测试。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Feb 2;24(2):e28252. doi: 10.2196/28252.
4
Associations Between Sociodemographic Characteristics, eHealth Literacy, and Health-Promoting Lifestyle Among University Students in Taipei: Cross-Sectional Validation Study of the Chinese Version of the eHealth Literacy Scale.台北大学生社会人口特征、电子健康素养与促进健康生活方式之间的关联:电子健康素养量表中文版的横断面验证研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Jul 18;26:e52314. doi: 10.2196/52314.
5
Reliability and Validity of the Telephone-Based eHealth Literacy Scale Among Older Adults: Cross-Sectional Survey.老年人基于电话的电子健康素养量表的信效度:横断面调查
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Oct 26;19(10):e362. doi: 10.2196/jmir.8481.
6
Structural Validation and Measurement Invariance Testing of the Chinese Version of the eHealth Literacy Scale Among Undergraduates: Cross-Sectional Study.大学生电子健康素养量表中文版的结构验证和测量不变性测试:横断面研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Dec 13;25:e48838. doi: 10.2196/48838.
7
Ill Literates or Illiterates? Investigating the eHealth Literacy of Users of Online Health Communities.文盲还是健康知识匮乏者?探究在线健康社区用户的电子健康素养
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Oct 4;19(10):e331. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7372.
8
[Validation of the eHealth Literacy Scale (eHEALS) in Spanish University Students].[西班牙大学生电子健康素养量表(eHEALS)的验证]
Rev Esp Salud Publica. 2015 May-Jun;89(3):329-38. doi: 10.4321/S1135-57272015000300010.
9
Three-Factor Structure of the eHealth Literacy Scale Among Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Computed Tomography Outpatients: A Confirmatory Factor Analysis.磁共振成像和计算机断层扫描门诊患者电子健康素养量表的三因素结构:验证性因素分析
JMIR Hum Factors. 2018 Feb 19;5(1):e6. doi: 10.2196/humanfactors.9039.
10
Exploring the Measurement Properties of the eHealth Literacy Scale (eHEALS) Among Baby Boomers: A Multinational Test of Measurement Invariance.探究婴儿潮一代电子健康素养量表(eHEALS)的测量属性:测量不变性的多国测试
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Feb 27;19(2):e53. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5998.

引用本文的文献

1
Online Health Information-Seeking in the Era of Large Language Models: Cross-Sectional Web-Based Survey Study.大语言模型时代的在线健康信息搜索:基于网络的横断面调查研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Mar 31;27:e68560. doi: 10.2196/68560.
2
Decomposition and Comparative Analysis of Urban-Rural Disparities in eHealth Literacy Among Chinese University Students: Cross-Sectional Study.中国大学生电子健康素养城乡差异的分解与比较分析:横断面研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Mar 26;27:e63671. doi: 10.2196/63671.
3
Cross-cultural adaptation of the eHealth Literacy Scale for Brazilian adolescents.
巴西青少年电子健康素养量表的跨文化适应性研究
Braz Oral Res. 2024 Sep 30;38:e094. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2024.vol38.0094. eCollection 2024.
4
Current status of electronic health literacy among pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus and their perceptions of online health information: a mixed-methods study.妊娠期糖尿病孕妇电子健康素养现状及其对在线健康信息的认知:一项混合方法研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 May 28;24(1):392. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06594-w.
5
The association and intervention effect between eHealth literacy and lifestyle behaviors among Chinese university students.电子健康素养与中国大学生生活方式行为的关联和干预效果。
Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2022 Dec 12;56:e20220147. doi: 10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2022-0147en. eCollection 2022.
6
Available tools to evaluate digital health literacy and engagement with eHealth resources: A scoping review.评估数字健康素养及对电子健康资源参与度的可用工具:一项范围综述
Heliyon. 2022 Aug 23;8(8):e10380. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10380. eCollection 2022 Aug.