• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

实时血管造影配准光学相干断层成像对经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的影响:OPTICO-integration II 试验。

Impact of real-time angiographic co-registered optical coherence tomography on percutaneous coronary intervention: the OPTICO-integration II trial.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, University Heart Center Berlin and Charité University Medicine Berlin, Campus Benjamin-Franklin (CBF), 12203, Berlin, Germany.

DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research) Partner Site Berlin, 12203, Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

Clin Res Cardiol. 2021 Feb;110(2):249-257. doi: 10.1007/s00392-020-01739-1. Epub 2020 Sep 5.

DOI:10.1007/s00392-020-01739-1
PMID:32889633
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7862500/
Abstract

AIMS

Longitudinal geographic mismatch (LGM) as well as edge dissections are associated with an increased risk of adverse events after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Recently, a novel system of real-time optical coherence tomography (OCT) with angiographic co-registration (ACR) became available and allows matched integration of cross-sectional OCT images to angiography. The OPTICO-integration II trial sought to assess the impact of ACR for PCI planning on the risk of LGM and edge dissections.

METHODS

A total of 84 patients were prospectively randomized to ACR-guided PCI, OCT-guided PCI (without co-registration), and angiography-guided PCI. Primary endpoint was a composite of major edge dissection and/or LGM as assessed by post-PCI OCT.

RESULTS

The primary endpoint was significantly reduced in ACR-guided PCI (4.2%) as compared to OCT-guided PCI (19.1%; p = 0.03) and angiography-guided PCI (25.5%; p < 0.01). Rates of LGM were 4.2%, 17.0%, and 22.9% in the ACR-guided PCI, in the OCT-guided PCI, and the angiography-guided PCI groups, respectively (ACR vs. OCT p = 0.04; ACR vs. angiography p = 0.04). The number of major edge dissections was low and without significant differences among the study groups (0% vs. 2.1% vs. 4.3%).

CONCLUSION

This study for the first time demonstrates superiority of ACR-guided PCI over OCT- and angiography-guided PCI in reducing the composite endpoint of major edge dissection and LGM, which was meanly driven by a reduction of LGM.

摘要

目的

纵向地理不匹配(LGM)以及边缘夹层与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后不良事件的风险增加相关。最近,一种新的实时光学相干断层扫描(OCT)与血管造影配准(ACR)系统已经问世,允许将横截面 OCT 图像与血管造影进行匹配整合。OPTICO-integration II 试验旨在评估 PCI 规划中 ACR 的使用对 LGM 和边缘夹层风险的影响。

方法

共 84 例患者前瞻性随机分为 ACR 指导 PCI、OCT 指导 PCI(无配准)和血管造影指导 PCI。主要终点是通过术后 OCT 评估的主要边缘夹层和/或 LGM 的复合结果。

结果

与 OCT 指导 PCI(19.1%;p=0.03)和血管造影指导 PCI(25.5%;p<0.01)相比,ACR 指导 PCI 显著降低了主要终点。ACR 指导 PCI、OCT 指导 PCI 和血管造影指导 PCI 组的 LGM 发生率分别为 4.2%、17.0%和 22.9%(ACR 与 OCT 相比,p=0.04;ACR 与血管造影相比,p=0.04)。主要边缘夹层的发生率较低,且各组间无显著差异(0%、2.1%、4.3%)。

结论

本研究首次证明 ACR 指导 PCI 优于 OCT 和血管造影指导 PCI,可降低主要边缘夹层和 LGM 的复合终点,这主要是由于 LGM 的减少。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/722a/7862500/48dc7b9870b6/392_2020_1739_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/722a/7862500/80281bfaafce/392_2020_1739_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/722a/7862500/48dc7b9870b6/392_2020_1739_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/722a/7862500/80281bfaafce/392_2020_1739_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/722a/7862500/48dc7b9870b6/392_2020_1739_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Impact of real-time angiographic co-registered optical coherence tomography on percutaneous coronary intervention: the OPTICO-integration II trial.实时血管造影配准光学相干断层成像对经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的影响:OPTICO-integration II 试验。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2021 Feb;110(2):249-257. doi: 10.1007/s00392-020-01739-1. Epub 2020 Sep 5.
2
Real-time optical coherence tomography coregistration with angiography in percutaneous coronary intervention-impact on physician decision-making: The OPTICO-integration study.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中实时光学相干断层扫描与血管造影的配准——对医生决策的影响:OPTICO整合研究
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Jul;92(1):30-37. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27313. Epub 2017 Sep 20.
3
Optical coherence tomography-guided versus angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention for patients with complex lesions (OCCUPI): an investigator-initiated, multicentre, randomised, open-label, superiority trial in South Korea.光学相干断层扫描引导与血管造影引导经皮冠状动脉介入治疗复杂病变患者(OCCUPI):韩国一项由研究者发起的、多中心、随机、开放标签、优效性试验。
Lancet. 2024 Sep 14;404(10457):1029-1039. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)01454-5. Epub 2024 Sep 2.
4
Optical coherence tomography compared with intravascular ultrasound and with angiography to guide coronary stent implantation (ILUMIEN III: OPTIMIZE PCI): a randomised controlled trial.光学相干断层成像术与血管内超声和血管造影指导冠状动脉支架置入术的比较(ILUMIEN III:OPTIMIZE PCI):一项随机对照试验。
Lancet. 2016 Nov 26;388(10060):2618-2628. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31922-5. Epub 2016 Oct 30.
5
Usefulness of optical coherence tomography with angiographic coregistration in the guidance of coronary stent implantation.光学相干断层扫描与血管造影配准在冠状动脉支架植入术指导中的应用价值。
Heart Vessels. 2022 Feb;37(2):200-207. doi: 10.1007/s00380-021-01911-1. Epub 2021 Jul 21.
6
A prospective, single-center, randomized study to assess whether automated coregistration of optical coherence tomography with angiography can reduce geographic miss.一项前瞻性、单中心、随机研究,旨在评估光学相干断层扫描与血管造影的自动配准是否可以减少地理遗漏。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Feb 15;93(3):411-418. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27854. Epub 2018 Oct 22.
7
Comparison of Stent Expansion Guided by Optical Coherence Tomography Versus Intravascular Ultrasound: The ILUMIEN II Study (Observational Study of Optical Coherence Tomography [OCT] in Patients Undergoing Fractional Flow Reserve [FFR] and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention).光学相干断层成像指导支架扩张与血管内超声的比较:ILUMIEN II 研究(血流储备分数 [FFR] 和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者的光学相干断层成像 [OCT] 观察性研究)。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Nov;8(13):1704-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.07.024.
8
Co-registration of optical coherence tomography and X-ray angiography in percutaneous coronary intervention. the Does Optical Coherence Tomography Optimize Revascularization (DOCTOR) fusion study.光学相干断层扫描与X射线血管造影在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的联合配准。光学相干断层扫描优化血运重建(DOCTOR)融合研究。
Int J Cardiol. 2015 Mar 1;182:272-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.12.088. Epub 2014 Dec 27.
9
OCT-Guided vs Angiography-Guided Coronary Stent Implantation in Complex Lesions: An ILUMIEN IV Substudy.OCT 指导与血管造影指导下复杂病变冠状动脉支架植入术:ILUMIEN IV 亚研究。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2024 Jul 23;84(4):368-378. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2024.04.037. Epub 2024 May 15.
10
Comparison of optical coherence tomography-guided versus intravascular ultrasound-guided percutaneous coronary intervention: Rationale and design of a randomized, controlled OCTIVUS trial.光学相干断层扫描引导与血管内超声引导经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的比较:随机、对照 OCTIVUS 试验的原理和设计。
Am Heart J. 2020 Oct;228:72-80. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2020.08.003. Epub 2020 Aug 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Emerging Image-Guided Navigation Techniques for Cardiovascular Interventions: A Scoping Review.心血管介入新兴的图像引导导航技术:一项范围综述。
Bioengineering (Basel). 2025 May 2;12(5):488. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering12050488.
2
Intravascular imaging-guided versus angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.血管内成像指导与血管造影指导的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:随机对照试验的系统评价和贝叶斯网状荟萃分析。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2024 Sep 11;24(1):483. doi: 10.1186/s12872-024-04105-5.
3
Optical coherence tomography-guided versus angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical use of intracoronary imaging. Part 2: acute coronary syndromes, ambiguous coronary angiography findings, and guiding interventional decision-making: an expert consensus document of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions.冠状动脉影像学的临床应用。第 2 部分:急性冠状动脉综合征、冠状动脉造影结果不明确和指导介入决策:欧洲经皮心血管介入学会的专家共识文件。
Eur Heart J. 2019 Aug 14;40(31):2566-2584. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz332.
2
A prospective, single-center, randomized study to assess whether automated coregistration of optical coherence tomography with angiography can reduce geographic miss.一项前瞻性、单中心、随机研究,旨在评估光学相干断层扫描与血管造影的自动配准是否可以减少地理遗漏。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Feb 15;93(3):411-418. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27854. Epub 2018 Oct 22.
3
光学相干断层扫描引导与血管造影引导的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2024 Apr 5;52:101405. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2024.101405. eCollection 2024 Jun.
4
Impact of real-time optical coherence tomography and angiographic coregistration on the percutaneous coronary intervention strategy.实时光学相干断层扫描与血管造影配准对经皮冠状动脉介入治疗策略的影响。
AsiaIntervention. 2023 Sep 21;9(2):124-132. doi: 10.4244/AIJ-D-22-00064. eCollection 2023 Sep.
5
Challenges and Burdens in the Coronary Artery Disease Care Pathway for Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Contemporary Narrative Review.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者的冠状动脉疾病护理路径中的挑战和负担:当代叙事性综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Apr 25;20(9):5633. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20095633.
6
Optical Coherence Tomography: An Eye Into the Coronary Artery.光学相干断层扫描:洞察冠状动脉的眼睛。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 May 11;9:854554. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.854554. eCollection 2022.
7
Intracoronary optical coherence tomography: state of the art and future directions.冠状动脉光学相干断层成像术:现状与未来方向。
EuroIntervention. 2021 Jun 11;17(2):e105-e123. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00089.
2018 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization.2018年欧洲心脏病学会/欧洲心胸外科学会心肌血运重建指南。
Eur Heart J. 2019 Jan 7;40(2):87-165. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy394.
4
Clinical Outcomes Following Intravascular Imaging-Guided Versus Coronary Angiography-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Stent Implantation: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis of 31 Studies and 17,882 Patients.血管内影像引导与冠状动脉造影引导经皮冠状动脉介入治疗伴支架植入的临床结局:31 项研究和 17882 例患者的系统评价和贝叶斯网络荟萃分析。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Dec 26;10(24):2488-2498. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.08.051. Epub 2017 Nov 15.
5
Real-time optical coherence tomography coregistration with angiography in percutaneous coronary intervention-impact on physician decision-making: The OPTICO-integration study.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中实时光学相干断层扫描与血管造影的配准——对医生决策的影响:OPTICO整合研究
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Jul;92(1):30-37. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27313. Epub 2017 Sep 20.
6
Intravascular ultrasound guidance improves clinical outcomes during implantation of both first- and second-generation drug-eluting stents: a meta-analysis.血管内超声引导可改善第一代和第二代药物洗脱支架植入过程中的临床结局:一项荟萃分析。
EuroIntervention. 2017 Jan 20;12(13):1632-1642. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-16-00769.
7
Optical coherence tomography compared with intravascular ultrasound and with angiography to guide coronary stent implantation (ILUMIEN III: OPTIMIZE PCI): a randomised controlled trial.光学相干断层成像术与血管内超声和血管造影指导冠状动脉支架置入术的比较(ILUMIEN III:OPTIMIZE PCI):一项随机对照试验。
Lancet. 2016 Nov 26;388(10060):2618-2628. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31922-5. Epub 2016 Oct 30.
8
Optical Coherence Tomography Predictors for Edge Restenosis After Everolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation.依维莫司洗脱支架植入术后边缘再狭窄的光学相干断层扫描预测指标
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Oct;9(10). doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.116.004231.
9
The OPTIS Integrated System: real-time, co-registration of angiography and optical coherence tomography.OPTIS集成系统:血管造影与光学相干断层扫描的实时、共配准
EuroIntervention. 2016 Sep 18;12(7):855-60. doi: 10.4244/EIJV12I7A140.
10
Optical Coherence Tomography to Optimize Results of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with Non-ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome: Results of the Multicenter, Randomized DOCTORS Study (Does Optical Coherence Tomography Optimize Results of Stenting).光学相干断层成像术优化非 ST 段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的结果:多中心、随机 DOCTORS 研究的结果(光学相干断层成像术是否优化支架置入术的结果)。
Circulation. 2016 Sep 27;134(13):906-17. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.024393. Epub 2016 Aug 29.