Department of Cardiology, University Heart Center Berlin and Charité University Medicine Berlin, Campus Benjamin-Franklin (CBF), 12203, Berlin, Germany.
DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research) Partner Site Berlin, 12203, Berlin, Germany.
Clin Res Cardiol. 2021 Feb;110(2):249-257. doi: 10.1007/s00392-020-01739-1. Epub 2020 Sep 5.
Longitudinal geographic mismatch (LGM) as well as edge dissections are associated with an increased risk of adverse events after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Recently, a novel system of real-time optical coherence tomography (OCT) with angiographic co-registration (ACR) became available and allows matched integration of cross-sectional OCT images to angiography. The OPTICO-integration II trial sought to assess the impact of ACR for PCI planning on the risk of LGM and edge dissections.
A total of 84 patients were prospectively randomized to ACR-guided PCI, OCT-guided PCI (without co-registration), and angiography-guided PCI. Primary endpoint was a composite of major edge dissection and/or LGM as assessed by post-PCI OCT.
The primary endpoint was significantly reduced in ACR-guided PCI (4.2%) as compared to OCT-guided PCI (19.1%; p = 0.03) and angiography-guided PCI (25.5%; p < 0.01). Rates of LGM were 4.2%, 17.0%, and 22.9% in the ACR-guided PCI, in the OCT-guided PCI, and the angiography-guided PCI groups, respectively (ACR vs. OCT p = 0.04; ACR vs. angiography p = 0.04). The number of major edge dissections was low and without significant differences among the study groups (0% vs. 2.1% vs. 4.3%).
This study for the first time demonstrates superiority of ACR-guided PCI over OCT- and angiography-guided PCI in reducing the composite endpoint of major edge dissection and LGM, which was meanly driven by a reduction of LGM.
纵向地理不匹配(LGM)以及边缘夹层与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后不良事件的风险增加相关。最近,一种新的实时光学相干断层扫描(OCT)与血管造影配准(ACR)系统已经问世,允许将横截面 OCT 图像与血管造影进行匹配整合。OPTICO-integration II 试验旨在评估 PCI 规划中 ACR 的使用对 LGM 和边缘夹层风险的影响。
共 84 例患者前瞻性随机分为 ACR 指导 PCI、OCT 指导 PCI(无配准)和血管造影指导 PCI。主要终点是通过术后 OCT 评估的主要边缘夹层和/或 LGM 的复合结果。
与 OCT 指导 PCI(19.1%;p=0.03)和血管造影指导 PCI(25.5%;p<0.01)相比,ACR 指导 PCI 显著降低了主要终点。ACR 指导 PCI、OCT 指导 PCI 和血管造影指导 PCI 组的 LGM 发生率分别为 4.2%、17.0%和 22.9%(ACR 与 OCT 相比,p=0.04;ACR 与血管造影相比,p=0.04)。主要边缘夹层的发生率较低,且各组间无显著差异(0%、2.1%、4.3%)。
本研究首次证明 ACR 指导 PCI 优于 OCT 和血管造影指导 PCI,可降低主要边缘夹层和 LGM 的复合终点,这主要是由于 LGM 的减少。