• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

估算非药物干预措施对韩国 COVID-19 控制的效果。

Estimating the Effectiveness of Non-Pharmaceutical Interventions on COVID-19 Control in Korea.

机构信息

Institute of Health and Environment, Graduate School of Public Health, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.

Department of Public Health Science, Graduate School of Public Health, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

J Korean Med Sci. 2020 Sep 7;35(35):e321. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2020.35.e321.

DOI:10.3346/jkms.2020.35.e321
PMID:32893522
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7476801/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has posed significant global public health challenges and created a substantial economic burden. Korea has experienced an extensive outbreak, which was linked to a religion-related super-spreading event. However, the implementation of various non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs), including social distancing, spring semester postponing, and extensive testing and contact tracing controlled the epidemic. Herein, we estimated the effectiveness of each NPI using a simulation model.

METHODS

A compartment model with a susceptible-exposed-infectious-quarantined-hospitalized structure was employed. Using the Monte-Carlo-Markov-Chain algorithm with Gibbs' sampling method, we estimated the time-varying effective contact rate to calibrate the model with the reported daily new confirmed cases from February 12th to March 31st (7 weeks). Moreover, we conducted scenario analyses by adjusting the parameters to estimate the effectiveness of NPI.

RESULTS

Relaxed social distancing among adults would have increased the number of cases 27.4-fold until the end of March. Spring semester non-postponement would have increased the number of cases 1.7-fold among individuals aged 0-19, while lower quarantine and detection rates would have increased the number of cases 1.4-fold.

CONCLUSION

Among the three NPI measures, social distancing in adults showed the highest effectiveness. The substantial effect of social distancing should be considered when preparing for the 2nd wave of COVID-19.

摘要

背景

2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行对全球公共卫生构成了重大挑战,并造成了巨大的经济负担。韩国经历了一次广泛的疫情爆发,这与一次与宗教有关的超级传播事件有关。然而,实施各种非药物干预措施(NPIs),包括社交距离、春季学期推迟、广泛的检测和接触者追踪,控制了疫情。在此,我们使用模拟模型估计了每种 NPI 的效果。

方法

采用易感-暴露-感染-隔离-住院的 compartment 模型。使用带有 Gibbs 抽样法的蒙特卡罗马尔可夫链算法,我们估计了时变有效接触率,以校准模型与 2 月 12 日至 3 月 31 日(7 周)报告的每日新确诊病例。此外,我们通过调整参数进行了情景分析,以估计 NPI 的效果。

结果

放松成年人的社交距离将使 3 月底的病例数增加 27.4 倍。春季学期不推迟将使 0-19 岁人群的病例数增加 1.7 倍,而较低的隔离和检测率将使病例数增加 1.4 倍。

结论

在这三种 NPI 措施中,成年人的社交距离措施效果最高。在为第二波 COVID-19 做准备时,应考虑社交距离的巨大影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5fff/7476801/3da581b0730b/jkms-35-e321-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5fff/7476801/b80e38695990/jkms-35-e321-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5fff/7476801/d081db35d51f/jkms-35-e321-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5fff/7476801/bd3a7c2c3f71/jkms-35-e321-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5fff/7476801/50c4a6ec53d0/jkms-35-e321-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5fff/7476801/3da581b0730b/jkms-35-e321-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5fff/7476801/b80e38695990/jkms-35-e321-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5fff/7476801/d081db35d51f/jkms-35-e321-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5fff/7476801/bd3a7c2c3f71/jkms-35-e321-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5fff/7476801/50c4a6ec53d0/jkms-35-e321-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5fff/7476801/3da581b0730b/jkms-35-e321-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Estimating the Effectiveness of Non-Pharmaceutical Interventions on COVID-19 Control in Korea.估算非药物干预措施对韩国 COVID-19 控制的效果。
J Korean Med Sci. 2020 Sep 7;35(35):e321. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2020.35.e321.
2
Effectiveness of isolation, testing, contact tracing, and physical distancing on reducing transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in different settings: a mathematical modelling study.隔离、检测、接触者追踪和保持社交距离在不同环境下减少 SARS-CoV-2 传播的效果:一项数学建模研究。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 Oct;20(10):1151-1160. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30457-6. Epub 2020 Jun 16.
3
Determining the optimal strategy for reopening schools, the impact of test and trace interventions, and the risk of occurrence of a second COVID-19 epidemic wave in the UK: a modelling study.确定英国学校重新开放的最佳策略、检测和追踪干预措施的影响,以及发生第二波 COVID-19 疫情的风险:一项建模研究。
Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2020 Nov;4(11):817-827. doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(20)30250-9. Epub 2020 Aug 3.
4
The impact of social distancing and public behavior changes on COVID-19 transmission dynamics in the Republic of Korea.社交距离和公众行为改变对韩国 COVID-19 传播动力学的影响。
PLoS One. 2020 Sep 24;15(9):e0238684. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238684. eCollection 2020.
5
COVID-19 in South Korea.韩国的 COVID-19 疫情。
Postgrad Med J. 2020 Jul;96(1137):399-402. doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2020-137738. Epub 2020 May 4.
6
Response to COVID-19 in South Korea and implications for lifting stringent interventions.韩国对 COVID-19 的应对措施及放宽严格干预措施的影响。
BMC Med. 2020 Oct 9;18(1):321. doi: 10.1186/s12916-020-01791-8.
7
Mathematical assessment of the impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions on curtailing the 2019 novel Coronavirus.数学评估非药物干预措施对遏制 2019 年新型冠状病毒的影响。
Math Biosci. 2020 Jul;325:108364. doi: 10.1016/j.mbs.2020.108364. Epub 2020 May 1.
8
Impact of self-imposed prevention measures and short-term government-imposed social distancing on mitigating and delaying a COVID-19 epidemic: A modelling study.自行采取预防措施和短期政府实施社会隔离对减轻和延缓 COVID-19 疫情的影响:建模研究。
PLoS Med. 2020 Jul 21;17(7):e1003166. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003166. eCollection 2020 Jul.
9
Effectiveness of preventive measures against COVID-19: A systematic review of modeling studies in indian context.预防 COVID-19 措施的有效性:印度情境下建模研究的系统综述。
Indian J Public Health. 2020 Jun;64(Supplement):S156-S167. doi: 10.4103/ijph.IJPH_464_20.
10
Interventions to mitigate early spread of SARS-CoV-2 in Singapore: a modelling study.干预措施以减轻 SARS-CoV-2 在新加坡的早期传播:一项建模研究。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 Jun;20(6):678-688. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30162-6. Epub 2020 Mar 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of individual preventive practices on COVID-19 infection: an analysis of big data collected at PCR testing centers in Hiroshima, Japan.个体预防措施对新冠病毒感染的影响:对日本广岛PCR检测中心收集的大数据的分析
BMC Public Health. 2025 Feb 19;25(1):681. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-21709-4.
2
Modelling the impact of behavioural interventions during pandemics: A systematic review.模拟大流行期间行为干预措施的影响:一项系统综述。
PLoS One. 2025 Feb 10;20(2):e0310611. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0310611. eCollection 2025.
3
Persuasive Effects of Crisis Communication during Public Health Emergency Outbreaks in China.

本文引用的文献

1
The impact of COVID-19 and strategies for mitigation and suppression in low- and middle-income countries.新冠疫情的影响以及中低收入国家的缓解和抑制策略。
Science. 2020 Jul 24;369(6502):413-422. doi: 10.1126/science.abc0035. Epub 2020 Jun 12.
2
Evaluation of Chemical Protocols for Inactivating SARS-CoV-2 Infectious Samples.评估用于灭活 SARS-CoV-2 传染性样本的化学方案。
Viruses. 2020 Jun 8;12(6):624. doi: 10.3390/v12060624.
3
Effect of non-pharmaceutical interventions to contain COVID-19 in China.中国采取的非药物性干预措施对遏制 2019 冠状病毒病的效果。
中国突发公共卫生事件期间危机沟通的说服效果
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Oct 1;14(10):885. doi: 10.3390/bs14100885.
4
Trends in Nationally Notifiable Infectious Diseases in Humans and Animals during COVID-19 Pandemic, South Korea.新冠疫情期间韩国人间和动物间法定传染病的流行趋势
Emerg Infect Dis. 2024 Jun;30(6):1154-1163. doi: 10.3201/eid3006.231422.
5
Trends in emergency department visits for emergency care-sensitive conditions before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: a nationwide study in Korea, 2019-2021.2019-2021年韩国全国性研究:新冠疫情之前及期间急诊护理敏感疾病的急诊科就诊趋势
Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2024 Mar;11(1):88-93. doi: 10.15441/ceem.23.087. Epub 2024 Mar 21.
6
Nationwide Trends in Non-COVID-19 Infectious Disease Laboratory Tests in the Era of the COVID-19 Pandemic in Korea.韩国 COVID-19 大流行时期非 COVID-19 传染病实验室检测的全国趋势。
J Korean Med Sci. 2023 Dec 4;38(47):e408. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2023.38.e408.
7
Changes in Urban Walking Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic in a Metropolitan City of South Korea.韩国某大城市新冠疫情之前及期间城市步行情况的变化
J Healthy Eat Act Living. 2021 Dec 10;1(4):216-225. eCollection 2021.
8
Mathematical Modeling of COVID-19 Transmission and Intervention in South Korea: A Review of Literature.《韩国 COVID-19 传播及干预的数学建模:文献综述》。
Yonsei Med J. 2023 Jan;64(1):1-10. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2022.0471.
9
COVID-19 Outbreak in Daegu City, Korea and Response to COVID-19: How Have We Dealt and What Are the Lessons?韩国大邱市的 COVID-19 疫情爆发及对 COVID-19 的应对:我们是如何应对的,有哪些经验教训?
J Korean Med Sci. 2022 Dec 26;37(50):e356. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2022.37.e356.
10
Efficiency of Malaysian states in managing the COVID-19 outbreak in 2020 and 2021.2020 年和 2021 年马来西亚各州管理 COVID-19 疫情的效率。
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 26;17(10):e0275754. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275754. eCollection 2022.
Nature. 2020 Sep;585(7825):410-413. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2293-x. Epub 2020 May 4.
4
School Opening Delay Effect on Transmission Dynamics of Coronavirus Disease 2019 in Korea: Based on Mathematical Modeling and Simulation Study.学校延迟开学对韩国 2019 年冠状病毒病传播动力学的影响:基于数学建模和模拟研究。
J Korean Med Sci. 2020 Apr 6;35(13):e143. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2020.35.e143.
5
The effect of human mobility and control measures on the COVID-19 epidemic in China.人口流动和防控措施对中国 COVID-19 疫情的影响。
Science. 2020 May 1;368(6490):493-497. doi: 10.1126/science.abb4218. Epub 2020 Mar 25.
6
Covid-19: identifying and isolating asymptomatic people helped eliminate virus in Italian village.新冠疫情:识别并隔离无症状感染者助力意大利村庄消灭病毒。
BMJ. 2020 Mar 23;368:m1165. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m1165.
7
Viral dynamics in mild and severe cases of COVID-19.新冠肺炎轻症和重症病例中的病毒动力学
Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 Jun;20(6):656-657. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30232-2. Epub 2020 Mar 19.
8
Estimating the asymptomatic proportion of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) cases on board the Diamond Princess cruise ship, Yokohama, Japan, 2020.估算 2020 年日本横滨钻石公主号游轮上的 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)病例的无症状比例。
Euro Surveill. 2020 Mar;25(10). doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.10.2000180.
9
Report on the Epidemiological Features of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Outbreak in the Republic of Korea from January 19 to March 2, 2020.2020 年 1 月 19 日至 3 月 2 日韩国 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)疫情的流行病学特征报告。
J Korean Med Sci. 2020 Mar 16;35(10):e112. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2020.35.e112.
10
The Incubation Period of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) From Publicly Reported Confirmed Cases: Estimation and Application.新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)的潜伏期来自公开报告的确诊病例:估计和应用。
Ann Intern Med. 2020 May 5;172(9):577-582. doi: 10.7326/M20-0504. Epub 2020 Mar 10.